Skip to main content

Videogames and Fictionalism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Computer Games

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 7))

Abstract

Videogames depict objects, individuals and situations that, like those depicted in fictions such as novels and films seem imagined rather than real. There has been some resistance within game theory to the idea that videogames and the objects depicted in them are fictional, however. In particular, games scholar Espen Aarseth has argued that some objects seen in videogames are best seen as virtual rather than fictional. This is because virtual objects such as videogame dragons and swords allow player engagement in a way that the fictional objects of novels and films do not. In this paper I will provide an analysis of the concepts of fiction and virtuality that allows the reconciliation of our intuitions about each. The dragons and swords seen in videogames are fictional in being generated as a part of an imaginative game, but they are also virtual in being distinctively robust and interactive fictive props.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Aarseth, E. 2005. Doors and perception: Fiction vs. simulation in games. Paper presented at the Digital Arts and Culture conference, Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillois, R. 1961. Man, play, and games. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. 1990. The philosophy of horror or paradoxes of the heart. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, N. 1998. A philosophy of mass art. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogburn, J., and M. Silcox. 2009. Philosophy through video games. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, G. 1990. The nature of fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Feagin, S. 1996. Reading with feeling. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, M. 1993. The metaphysics of virtual reality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huizinga, J. 1950. Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juul, J. 2005. Half-real: Videogames between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarque, P. 1996. Fictional points of view. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamarque, P., and Stein Haugom Olsen. 1994. Truth, fiction, and literature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, P. 2001. Narrative. In The Routledge companion to aesthetics, ed. Berys Gaut and Dominic McIver. Lopes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, D.M. 2001. The ontology of interactive art. Journal of Aesthetic Education 35(4): 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, D.M. 2009. A philosophy of computer art. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. 1998. Hamlet on the holodeck. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, Steven. 2000. Trigger happy: The inner life of videogames. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, C. 1975. How can we be moved by the fate of Anna Karenina? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supp. Vol. 49: 67–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. 2007. Deeper than reason: Emotion and its role in music, literature and art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scruton, R. 1974. Art and the imagination. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, A. 2009. What is interactivity? Journal of Aesthetic Education 43(4): 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavinor, G. 2008. A definition of videogames. Contemporary Aesthetics 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavinor, G. 2009. The art of videogames. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tavinor, G. 2011. Virtual worlds and interactive fictions. In Truth in fiction, ed. Franck Lihoreau. Heusenstamm: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, K. 1978. Fearing fictions. Journal of Philosophy, 75: 5–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertheim, M. 1999. The pearly gates of cyberspace. London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant Tavinor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tavinor, G. (2012). Videogames and Fictionalism. In: Sageng, J., Fossheim, H., Mandt Larsen, T. (eds) The Philosophy of Computer Games. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4249-9_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics