Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethics and Practice in Virtual Worlds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Philosophy of Computer Games

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 7))

Abstract

This paper argues that acts that occur in MMOs (i.e., virtual world games), even those which have meaning only in relation to the internal values of the virtual space, can (and in some cases do) have moral content.

The paper focuses on arguments presented by T. M. Powers (2003) in Real Wrongs in Virtual Communities, which support acts in social worlds such as LambaMOO having content, but denies that MMOs meet the necessary criteria. It is argued that there is good reason to modify Powers’s criteria for establishing if act, online have moral content, and that some acts in MMOs meet these modified criteria. Powers’s and others’ belief that MMOs are Hobbesian worlds is shown to be a misreading of the highly regulated conflict and game play that they host.

Lastly, it is argued that acts occurring in the context of practices that have arisen in MMOs do have moral content only in the case that they meet the criteria set out in this paper and the specific context provides sufficient signaling of norms and the acceptance of those norms, that is that they occur within the context of an identifiable community of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://starwarsgalaxies.station.sony.com/players/guides.vm?id=80000

  2. 2.

    http://wiki.aie-guild.org/index.php?title=Policies_and_Responsibilities

  3. 3.

    http://guildinfinity.net/web/index.php?option=com_content%26task=view%26id=22%26Itemid=27

References

  • Aarseth, E. 1997. Cybertext perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, C. 1996. What’s wrong with the “Golden Rule”? Conundrums of conducting ethical research in cyberspace. The Information Society 12(2): 175–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allison, L. 1980. Batsman and bowler: The key relation of Victorian England. Journal of Sport History 7(2): 5–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J.L. 1962. How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, R.A. 1996. Hearts, clubs, diamonds, spades: Players who suit MUDs. Journal of MUD Research 1(1), June 1996. Retrieved on December 12, 2006, from http://www.mud.co.uk/richard/hcds.htm.

  • Bartle, R.A. 2003. Designing virtual worlds. Indianapolis: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartle, R.A. 2004. Managing to manage. Presentation at Community Work: Managing Multiplayer Culture, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, May 2004. Retrieved on December 12, 2006, from http://game.itu.dk/comwork/ppt/Bartle.zip.

  • Brailford, D. 1985. Morals and maulers: The ethics of early Pugilism. Journal of Sport History 12(2): 126–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brey, P. 1999. The ethics of representation and action in virtual reality. Ethics and Information Technology 1: 5–14. Kluwer Academic.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R., and A. Schneider. 2003. Fair play as respect for the game. In Sports ethics, ed. J. Boxill. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castronova, Edward, and Joshua Fairfield. 2007. Dragon kill points: A summary whitepaper, January, 2007. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=958945.

  • Consalvo, M. 2003. ‘It’s no videogame’: Global news media commentary and the second Gulf War. In Level Up Conference Proceedings, November, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consalvo, M. 2005. Rule sets, cheating, and magic circles: Studying games and ethics. International Review of Information Ethics 1(4): 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Laat, P.B. 2005. Trusting virtual trust. Ethics and Information Technology 7: 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Mul, J. 2005. The game of life. Narrative and ludic identity formation in computer games. In Handbook of computer games studies, ed. J. Goldstein and J. Raessens, 251–266. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L., and J.W. Sanders. 2001. Artificial evil and the foundation of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 3(1): 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foo, C.Y., and E.M.I. Koivisto. 2004. Defining grief play in MMORPGs: Player and developer perceptions. In Proceedings of the Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology ACE2004, Singapore, June 3–5, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayles, K. 1999. How we became posthuman: Virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature and informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horner, D.S. 2001. The moral status of virtual action. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on the social and ethical impacts of information and communication technologies: Ethicomp, ETHICOMP 2001, ed. T.W. Bynum et al., 226–235. Gadansk, Poland: Technical University of Gdansk.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, C., D. Johnson, and K. Miller. 2003. Virtual harms and real responsibilities. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, Summer 2003, IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsson, M., and T.L. Taylor. 2003. The Sopranos meets Everquest – social networking in massively multiuser networking games. FineArt Forum 17:8, August 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D.G. 1997. Ethics online. Communications of the ACM, Archive 40(1): 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joinson, A.N. 2003. Understanding the psychology of Internet behavior: Virtual worlds, real Lives. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klastrup, L. 2003. Towards a poetics of virtual worlds: Multi-user textuality and the emergence of story. Ph.D thesis. Retrieved on December 12, 2006, from http://www.klastrup.dk/thesis.htm.

  • Koster, R. 1998. A story about a tree. Retrieved on December 12, 2006, from http://www.raphkoster.com/gaming/essay1.shtml.

  • Krzywinska, T. 2005. Who’s world is it?: Creative play and player presence in world of warcraft. Paper Presented to DiGRA 2005, Vancouver, Canada, June 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loland, S. 2002. Fair play in sport. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludlow, P. 2006. From Sherlock and Buffy to Klingon and Norrathian platinum pieces: Pretence, contextalism, and the myth of fiction. Philosophical Issues 16(1): 162–183. Blackwell.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. 1984. After virtue, 2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaby, T.M. 2006. Beyond play: A new approach to games. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=922456.

  • McFee, G. 2004. Normativity, justification, and (MacIntyrean) practices: Some thoughts on methodology of the philosophy of sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport XXXI: 15–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, M. 1974. The game game. Philosophy 49: 231–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikeal, R.L., and J. Stromer-Galley. 2003. Simulated manners: Mechanisms of social control in an embodied on-line environment, The Sims Online. Presentation to AoIR Toronto 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, J., and B. Patrovsky. 2003. Developing online games. Indianapolis: New Riders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussenbaum, H. 2001. Securing trust online: Wisdom or oxymoron? Boston Law Review 81: 635–664.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paasonen, S. 2002. Gender, identity, and (the limits of) play on the Internet. In Women & everyday uses of the Internet: Agency & identity, ed. M. Consalvo and S. Paasonen. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pargman, D., and A. Erissson. 2005. Law, order and conflicts of interesting in massively multiplayer online games. In Proceedings of DiGRA 2005 Conference, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 1995. The cunning of trust. Philosophy and Public Affairs 24(3): 202–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. 2004. Trust, reliance and the Internet. Analyse und Kritik 26: 108–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, T.M. 2003. Real wrongs in virtual communities. Ethics and Information Technology 5: 191–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1955. Two concepts of rules. Philosophical Review 65: 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicart, M. 2006. Computer games players, ethics. Ph.D thesis. Retrieved December 20, 2006, from http://www1.itu.dk/graphics/ITU-library/Internet/Forskning/Phd/PhD_Defences/Dissertations/Dissertation_as_turned_in_MSV.pdf.

  • Smith, J.H. 2003. Avatars you can trust – A survey on the issue of trust and communication in MMORPGs, game research. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.game-research.com/art_avatars_trust.asp.

  • Smith, J.S. 2004. Playing dirty: Understanding conflicts in multiplayer games. Paper presented to AoIR 2004. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.itu.dk/people/smith/texts/playing_dirty.pdf – Understanding conflicts in multiplayer games, AoIR 2004.

  • Southern, M.2001. The cultural study of games: More than just games. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://www.igda.org/articles/msouthern_culture.php.

  • Spaight, T. 2003. Who killed Miss Norway. Retrieved December 12, 2006, from http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2003/04/14/who_killed_miss_norway/index_np.html.

  • Stromer-Galley, J., and R.L. Mikeal. 2003. Participant norms, Simulated manners: Mechanisms of social control in an embodied on-line environment, The Sims Online. AoIR, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Struna, N.L. 1989. The formalizing of sport and the formation of an elite: The Chesapeake Gentry, 1650–1720s. Journal of Sport History 13(3) (Winter, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trukle, S. 1995. Life on the screen. New York: Simon and Shuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfendale, J. 2006. My avatar, my self: Virtual harm and attachment. Ethics and Information Technology 9: 111–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yee, N. 2002. Mosiac: Stories of digital lives and identities. Accessed March 21, 2010 Mosaic.Available at: http://www.nickyee.com/mosaic/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. FRSA, Virtual Policy Network, Truro, UK

    Ren Reynolds

Authors
  1. Ren Reynolds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Philosophy, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, 0315, Norway

    John Richard Sageng

  2. , University of Philosophy, Classics, Hist, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0315, Norway

    Hallvard Fossheim

  3. , Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgt 41, Stavanger, 4036, Norway

    Tarjei Mandt Larsen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Netherlands

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reynolds, R. (2012). Ethics and Practice in Virtual Worlds. In: Sageng, J., Fossheim, H., Mandt Larsen, T. (eds) The Philosophy of Computer Games. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4249-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation