Abstract
Multiple ways of representing the emerging new genetic knowledge and its implications have resulted from recent research including the Human Genome Project. In this chapter, we discuss that the presentation of human genetics is now less deterministic, formulated in a more systemic approach, taking into account the interaction between the genes and their environment (epigenetics), discussing the notion of biological determinism, and including connections with ethical and social implications. How are these new genetic trends represented today in biology textbooks? Do multiple ways exist across cultures, languages, and countries? Two complementary sets of data are presented and discussed: (1) the representation of human genetic diseases in French biology textbooks, showing a frequent absence of a systemic approach with nevertheless some exceptions, and (2) a comparative analysis of biology textbooks in 16 countries, showing the common similarity in their use of an implicit message through the same clothes and hairstyle of identical twins, but strong differences—in their use of the metaphorgenetic program —which depended on the sociocultural context of each country. We argue that the renewal of the taught representations of human genetics is correlated not only with the renewal of scientific knowledge but also with implicit values underlying each country’s sociocultural context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Based on the online data from France’s Centre d’Epidémiologie sur les causes médicales de décès (CéPiDc) athttp://www.invs.sante.fr/surveillance/maladies_rares/mortalite_mucoviscidose.htm (data retrieved in August 2011).
- 2.
Depending the age of the mother, from 1/1,500 (20 years old) to 1/100 (40 years old) (Herman et al.2002)
References
Abrougui, M. (1997).La génétique humaine dans l'enseignement secondaire en France et en Tunisie. [Human genetics in secondary schools, in France and in Tunisia]. Thèse Doctorat Université Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Abrougui, M., & Clément, P. (1997). Enseigner la génétique humaine: Citoyenneté, ou fatalisme? [Teaching human genetics: Citizenship or fatalism?]. In A. Giordan, J.-L. Martinand, & D. Raichvarg (Eds.)Actes JIES 19e Journées internationales sur l'éducation scientifique [International days on science education] (pp. 255–260). Chamonix, France: Université Paris Sud.
Abrougui, M., & Clément, P. (2005). Two strategies to introduce genetics in Tunisian and French textbooks. In R. Pinto, & D. Couso (Eds.)Proceedings of the fifth international conference on contributions of research to enhancing students’ interests in learning science (pp. 1245–1249). Barcelona, Spain.
Atlan, H. (1979).Entre le cristal et la fumée: Essai sur l’organisme vivant [Between crystal and smoke: An essay on the living organism]. Paris: Seuil.
Atlan, H. (1999).La fin du “tout génétique” [The end of “everything is genetic”]. Paris: INRA.
Beckwith, J. (1993). A historical view of social responsibility in genetics.BioScience, 43(5), 327–333.
BIOHEAD-Citizen. (2004–2008).Biology, health and environmental education for better citizenship. In G. Carvalho, P. Clément, & F. Bogner (Eds.)European research project (Specific Targeted Research n° CIT2-CT2004-506015, FP6, Priority 7).http://projectos.iec.uminho.pt/projeuropa/
Carvalho, G. S., Dantas, C., Rauma, A.-L., Luzi, D., Bogner, F., Caussidier, C., & Clément, P. (2008). Comparing health education approaches in textbooks of sixteen countries.Science Education International, 19(2), 133–146.
Castéra, J., Bruguière, C., & Clément, P. (2008). Genetic diseases and genetic determinism models in French secondary school biology textbooks.Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 53–59.
Castéra, J., & Clément, P. (2007). Hereditarianism and reductionism in biology school textbooks, through images of twins. A comparative study between 15 countries. InProceedings of the ESERA (European Science Education Research Association) (4 p.). Malmö, Sweden (CD-ROM).
Castéra, J., Clément, P., Abrougui, M., Sarapuu, T., Turcinaviciene, J., Agoram, B., et al. (2008). Genetic Determinism in school textbooks: A comparative study conducted among 16 countries.Science Education International, 19(2), 163–184.
Castéra, J., Clément, P., & Kosonen, A-L. (2009, August).The genetic determinism of human performances: A comparison between teachers' conceptions in Finland and France. Paper Presented at the conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Istanbul, Turkey.
Chakavarti, A., & Little, P. (2003). Nature, nurture and human disease.Nature, 421, 412–414.
Changeux, J. P. (1983).L'homme neuronal [The neuronal man]. Paris: Fayard.
Chevassus-Au-Louis, N. (2001). Dix-huit facettes d'un même concept [Eighteen facets of the same concept].La Recherche, 348, 51–56.
Clément, P. (1996). L’imagerie biomédicale: Définition d’une typologie et proposition d’activités pédagogiques [Biomedical imagery: Definition of a typology and proposition of pedagogical activities].Aster, 22, 87–126.
Clément, P. (2004). Science et idéologie: Exemples en didactique et épistémologie de la biologie [Science and ideology: Examples in didactics and epistemology of biology].Actes du colloque “Sciences, médias et société” [Proceedings of the Conference “Sciences, media and society”], Lyon, ENS LSh (Laboratoire Communication, Culture et Société) (pp. 53–69). Available:http://sciences-medias.ens-lsh.fr/IMG/pdf/actes.pdf
Clément, P. (2006). Didactic transposition and the KVP model: Conceptions as interactions between scientific knowledge, values and social practices. In:Proceedings summer school ESERA (pp. 9–18). Minho, Portugal: IEC, University of Minho.
Clément, P. (2007). Introducing the cell concept by both animal and plant cells: A historical and didactic approach.Science Education, 16, 423–440.
Clément, P., Blaes, N., & Luciani, A. (1980). Le mythe tenace du “chromosome du crime”, encore appelé “chromosome de l'agressivité” [Persistent myth of the “chromosome of crime”, also called “chromosome of aggressiveness”].Raison Présente, 54, 109–127.
Clément, P., & Castéra, J. (2007). L’Actualité des images de vrais jumeaux dans les magazines de vulgarisation et dans les manuels scolaires [Pictures of identical twins in popular magazines and in school textbooks. In A. Giordan, J. L. Martinand, & D. Raichvarg (eds.)Actes JIES (Journées Internationales sur la Communication, l’Éducation et la Culture Scientifiques et Industrielle) [International days on science education] (6 p.), Chamonix, France (CD-ROM).
Clément, P., & Forissier, T. (2001). L’identité biologique n’est pas que génétique: un défi pour un enseignement citoyen [The biological identity is not only genetic: A challenge for a citizenship teaching]. InCommunication au symposium BioEd 2000:The challenge of the next century (pp. 15–18). Paris. Available:www.iubs.org/cbe/pdf/clement.pdf
Clément, P., Forissier, T., & Carvalho, G. S. (2003). The structuring influence of first images on the construction of science concepts. An historical and didactical approach. InActs of the 4th ESERA conference. Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands (CD-ROM).
Clément, P., Mouehli, L., & Abrougui, M. (2006). Héréditarisme, béhaviorisme, constructivisme: le système nerveux dans les manuels scolaires français et tunisiens [Hereditarianim, behaviorism, constructivism: Nervous system in French and Tunisian school textbooks].Aster, 42, 187–222.
Dambrun, M., Kamiejski, R., Haddadi, N., & Duarte, S. (2009). Why does social dominance orientation decrease with university exposure to the social sciences? The impact of institutional socialization and the mediating role of “geneticism”.European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 88–100.
Edelman, G. (1987).Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.
Forissier, T., & Clément, P. (2003). Teaching “biological identity” as genome/environmental interactions.Journal of Biological Education, 37(2), 85–91.
Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Paz, M. F., Ropero, S., Setien, F., Ballestar, M. L., et al. (2005). Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 10604–10609.
Gayon, J. (2009). Déterminisme génétique, déterminisme bernardien, déterminisme laplacien [Genetic determinism, Bernard’s determinism, Laplace’s determinism]. In J.-J. Kupiec O., Gandrillon M., Morange & M. Silberstein (eds.)Le hasard au cœur de la cellule, probabilité, déterminisme, génétique [Chance at the heart of the cell, probability, determinism, genetics] (pp. 79–91). Paris: Syllepse.
Gould, S. J. (1997).Darwin et les grandes énigmes de la vie [Darwin and the great mysteries of life] (éd. originale: 1977). Paris: Seuil.
Herman, A., Dreazen, E., Herman, A. M., Batukan, C. E., Holzgreve, W., & Tercanli, S. (2002). Bedside estimation of Down syndrome risk during first trimester ultrasound screening.Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 20(5), 468–475.
Jacquard, A. (1972).Eloge de la différence: La génétique et les hommes [In praise of difference: Genetics and human affairs]. Paris: Seuil.
Jacquard, A., & Kahn, A. (2001).L'avenir n'est pas écrit [The future is not written]. Paris: Bayard.
Keller, E. F. (2003).Le siècle du gène [The century of the gene]. Paris: Gallimard.
Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationships to mechanisms of motivated social cognition.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702.
Képès, F. (2005). L'épigénétique comme aspect de la post génomique [Epigenetics as an aspect of post-genomics].Medecine/Science, 21, 371–376.
Kochkar, M. (2007).Les déterminismes biologiques. Analyse des conceptions et des changements conceptuels consécutifs à un enseignement sur l’épigenèse cérébrale chez des enseignants et des apprenants tunisiens [Biological determinism: Analysis of Tunisian teachers’ and learners’ conceptions and conceptual changes resulting from education on cerebral epigenesis]. Thèse Doctorat Université Lyon 1 & ISEFC – Université de Tunis.
Kochkar, M. (2010)Enseigner des valeurs ou des connaissances ? L’épigenèse cérébrale ou le “tout génétique” [Teaching values or knowledge? Cerebral epigenesis or “all genetics”]. Saarbrücken, Germany: Editions Universitaires Européennes.
Kupiec, J.-J. (2008).L’origine des individus [The origin of individuals]. Paris: Fayard.
Kupiec, J.-J. (2009). Le hasard au cœur de la vie. Les gènes jouent-ils aux dés ? [Chance at the heart of life: Genes do they play at dice?].La Recherche, 434, 51–53.
Kupiec, J. J., Gandrillon O., Morange, M., & Silberstein, M. (2009).Le hasard au cœur de la Cellule. Probabilité, déterminisme, génétique [Chance at the heart of the cell. Probability, determinism, genetics ]. Paris: Editions Syllepse.
Kupiec, J.-J., & Sonigo P. (2000).Ni Dieu, ni gène [Neither God, nor gene]. Paris: Seuil.
Lewis, J. (2004). Traits, genes, particles and information: Re-visiting students’ understandings of genetics.International Journal of Science Education, 26, 195–206.
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). All in the genes? Young people's understanding of the nature of genes.Journal of Biological Education, 34, 74–79.
Lewontin, R. (2000).The triple helix: Gene, organism, environment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lewontin, R. C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984).Not in our genes: Biology, ideology and human nature. New York: Pantheon.
Morange, M. (2005a). L'épigénétique: un domaine aux multiples facettes [Epigenetics: A multifaceted field].Medecine/Science, 21, 339.
Morange, M. (2005b). Quelle place pour l'épigénétique ? [What place for epigenetics?].Medecine/Science, 21, 367–369.
Morel, M. C., & Miquel, P. A., (2001).Programme génétique: Concept biologique ou métaphore ? [Genetic program: biological concept or metaphor?]. Paris: éditions Kimé.
Morin, E. (1990).Introduction à la pensée complexe [Introduction to complex thought]. Paris: ESF.
Nelkins, D., & Lindee, M. S. (1995).The DNA mystique: The gene as a cultural icon. New York: Freeman.
Noble, D. (2007).La musique de la vie. La biologie au-delà du génome [The music of life: Biology beyond the genome]. Paris: Seuil.
O’Mahony, P., & Schäfer, M. S. (2005). Comparing German and Irish media discourse on human genome research.Journal of Social Studies of Science, 35(1), 99–130.
Pàldi, A., & Coisne, S. (2009). La fin du déterminisme en biologie [The end of determinism in biology].La Recherche, 434, 40–44.
Pouteau, S. (2007).Génétiquement indéterminé – Le vivant auto-organisé [Genetically undetermined: The auto-organization of life]. Versailles, France: Quae.
Quessada, M. P., & Clément, P. (2007). An epistemological approach to French syllabi on human origins during the 19th & 20th centuries.Science Education, 16(9–10), 991–1006.
Rose, H., Rose, S., Hanmer, J. Enzensberger, H. M., Franck, R., Lévy-Leblond, J. M., & Stéhelin L. (1977).L'idéologie de/dans la science [Ideology of/in science]. Paris: Le Seuil.
Séralini, G. E. (2003).Génétiquement incorrect [Genetically incorrect]. Paris: Flammarion.
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010). Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030.Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 87, 4–14.
Stengers, I. (1997).La Vie et l'Artifice: les visages de l'émergence [Life and Artifice: Faces of the emergence]. Cosmopolitiques. VI Paris: La Découverte.
Stewart, J. (1993). Au delà de l’inné et de l’acquis [Beyond the innate and the acquired].Intellectica, 16, 151–174.
Swynghedauw, B. (2000).Biologie et génétique moléculaire [Biology and molecular genetics]. Paris: Dunod
Van Speybroeck, L. (2002). From epigenesis to epigenetics: The case of C. H. Waddington.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 981, 61–81.
Wolf, N. (2002). Krankheitsursachen Gene. Neue Genetik und Public Health [Genes and causes of disease: New genetics and public health]. InPublications series of the research unit Public Health Policy Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Berlin, Germany.http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2002/p02-202.pdf
Wu, C. T., & Morris, J. (2001). Genes, genetics, and epigenetics: A correspondence.Science, 293, 1103–1105.
Zazzo, R. (1984).Le Paradoxe des jumeaux [The twins paradox]. Paris: Stock.
Acknowledgments
This research was financed by the BIOHEAD-Citizen project (2004–2008):Biology, Health and Environmental Education for Better Citizenship (E.C., STREP n° CIT2-CT2004-506015, FP6, Priority 7). We would like to thank our colleagues from the 16 countries who, in the context of this project, analyzed the textbooks of their country and provided us with the results for writing this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clément, P., Castéra, J. (2013). Multiple Representations of Human Genetics in Biology Textbooks. In: Treagust, D., Tsui, CY. (eds) Multiple Representations in Biological Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4191-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4192-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)