Skip to main content

Multiple Representations in Modeling Strategies for the Development of Systems Thinking in Biology Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multiple Representations in Biological Education

Part of the book series: Models and Modeling in Science Education ((MMSE,volume 7))

Abstract

For biological researchers, systems thinking is a basic conceptual framework, and many educationalists consider systems thinking as a metacognitive skill that enables students to understand and cope with the new scientific advancements that reach our society. With this in mind, we investigated the implementation of systems thinking in upper secondary biology education in several studies. In this chapter, we report a critical appraisal of our systems modeling approach that emerged from these studies. We first lay a theoretical foundation under our emergent modeling approach which prescribes the sequence in which multiple representations should be placed in a bottom-up educational strategy. Second, we articulate two studies that both designed and evaluated the development of a learning and teaching strategy that engaged students in developing multiple representations of living systems with increasing complexity. One study focused on the development of an initial systems model in cell biology, and the other addressed the use of computer modeling as a tool in the understanding of the dynamics in ecosystems. We conclude by critically looking back at these study results in the formulation of some general recommendations about the use of multiple representations in the development of systems thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Bertalanffy developed his General Systems Theory first via lectures, beginning in the 1930s and later via publications, starting in 1945.

  2. 2.

    The modeling tool which we refer to here is a software program called Powersim Constructor Lite and has been developed by Powersim Software AS (www.powersim.com). In educational settings, the program can be used, free of charge, on a noncommercial basis as in the study of Westra (2008).

References

  • Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1995). Reflections on a fifth-grade life science lesson: Making sense of children’s understanding of scientific models. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alberghina, L. (2007). Systems biology: Definitions and perspectives. In R. van Driel (Ed.), Systems biology; A grand challenge for Europe (pp. 8–9). Strasbourg, France: European Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, K. T., & Waarlo, A. J. (2009). On the theoretical input and output of ‘design research’ in biology education. In M. Hamann, A. J. Waarlo, & K. T. Boersma (Eds.), The nature of research in biological education: Old and new perspectives on theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 463–479). Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-Bèta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boersma, K., Waarlo, A. J., & Klaassen, K. (2010, July). The feasibility of systems thinking in biology education. Paper presented at the 8th ERIDOB conference, Braga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulte, A. M. W., Westbroek, H. B., De Jong, O., & Pilot, A. (2006). A research approach to designing chemistry education using authentic practices as contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 28(9), 1063–1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coll, R. K., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models and analogies in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 183–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. (1993). Models and modeling in science education. Hatfield, UK: Association of Science Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J., & Boulter, C. (Eds.). (2000). Developing models in science education. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations, part 1: horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 891–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Treagust, D. (2009). Towards a coherent model for macro, submicro and symbolic representations in chemical education. In J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple representations in chemical education (pp. 333–350). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. P. E. (1999). How emergent models may foster the constitution of formal mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1(2), 155–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knippels, M. C. P. J. (2002). Coping with the abstract and complex nature of genetics in biology education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-Bèta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G. E. (1985). An ecosystem approach to aquatic ecology: Mirror lake and its environment. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moore A. (2007). New biology for new curricula. Observations from the 6th international workshop on science education 17–19 May 2007. Heidelberg, Germany: European Molecular Biology Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff, R. P. (2003). Towards systems thinking in cell biology education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: CD-Bèta Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeff, R., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2008). Systems modelling and the development of coherent cell biological knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 543–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1945). Zu einer allgemeinen Systemlehre [Toward a general systems theory]. Blätter für deutsche Philosophie, 3/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). The theory of open systems in physics and biology. Science, 3, 23–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westra, R. H. V. (2008). Learning and teaching ecosystem behaviour in secondary education. Utrecht, The Netherlands: FIsme Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westra, R. H. V., Boersma, K. T., Savelsbergh, E. R., & Waarlo, A. J. (2008). Towards understanding ecosystem behaviour through systems thinking and modeling. In M. Hamann, M. Reiss, C. Boulter, & S. D. Tunnicliffe (Eds.), Biology in context: Learning and teaching for the twenty-first century (pp. 205–216). London: Institute of Education, University of London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roald Pieter Verhoeff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verhoeff, R.P., Boersma, K.T., Waarlo, A.J. (2013). Multiple Representations in Modeling Strategies for the Development of Systems Thinking in Biology Education. In: Treagust, D., Tsui, CY. (eds) Multiple Representations in Biological Education. Models and Modeling in Science Education, vol 7. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_18

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics