Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Textual Features and Language Demands of Primary Grade Science Textbooks: The Call for More Informational Texts in Primary Grades

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks

Abstract

There is no surprise that intermediate and upper grade students in American schools predominantly read informational texts (Moss, 2005), but it may astound some that half of all reading materials for primary grade students should now be nonfiction. According to the recently adopted Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects (CCSSO & NGA, 2011; corestandards.org), primary grade students are expected to use and learn from informational texts starting in first grade. In an earlier publication, Frey and Fisher similarly suggested that “…teaching students to read for information must begin with the primary grades” (2007, p. 3; see also, Duke, 2004; Duke & Bennett-Armistead, 2003). But in many schools, young children rarely use informational texts. In this current educational climate of increased technology and global competitiveness, the goal is to increase rigor in reading and writing instruction by increasing access to and production of expository texts, ensuring students are “college and career ready in literacy” when they graduate from high school. By the 12th grade, it is recommended that 70–80 % of the texts students read and write are informational. Thus, the learning standards call for curricular and pedagogical reform to include more informational texts at all grade levels, starting in the primary grades.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvermann, D. E., Moon, J. S., & Hagood, M. C. (1999). Popular culture in the classroom: Teaching and researching critical media literacy. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelillo, J. (2003). Writing about reading: From book talks to literary essays. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1988). On selecting “considerate” content area textbooks. Remedial and Special Education, 9(1), 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Feiman-Nemser, S. (1988). Using textbooks and teachers’ guides: A dilemma for beginning teachers and teacher educators. Curriculum Inquiry, 18(4), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, N. (2011). Meeting the challenges of science textbooks in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 64(7), 474–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryce, N. (2012). “Mano a Mano”: Arts-based nonfiction literacy and content area learning. Language Arts, 89(3), 179–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, J. (2000). Reading reminders: Tools, tips, and techniques. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, D. (2000). It takes two: Teaching with twin texts of fact and fiction. The Reading Teacher, 53(5), 400–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, M. J. (1994). Evaluating the quality of textbooks for diverse learners. Remedial and Special Education, 15(6), 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1989). Designing science textbooks to enhance student understanding. Educational Psychologist, 24(3), 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children’s minds. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conderman, G., & Elf, N. (2007). What’s in this book? Engaging students through a textbook exploration activity. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 23(1), 111–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1988). Teaching readers about the structure of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 448–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) and National Governors Association (NGA). (2011). Common core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Retrieved at http://www.corestandards.org.

  • Daniels, D. (1996). A study of science textbook readability. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 42(3), 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K. (2004). The case for information text. Educational Leadership, 61(6), 40–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke, N. K., & Bennett-Armistead, V. S. (2003). Reading and writing informational text in the primary grades: Research-based practices. New York: Scholastic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2007). Reading for information in elementary school: Content literacy strategies to build comprehension. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt. (2008). Science: New York City edition. Orlando, FL: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hidi, S., & Baird, W. (1988). Strategies for increasing text-based interest and students’ recall of expository texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(4), 465–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kantor, R. N., Anderson, T. H., & Armbruster, B. B. (1983). How inconsiderate are children’s textbooks? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(1), 61–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulm, G., Roseman, J. E., & Treistman, M. (1999). A benchmarks-based approach to textbook evaluation. Science Books and Films, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallinson, G. G., Sturm, H. E., & Patton, R. E. (1950). The reading difficulty of textbooks in elementary science. The Elementary School Journal, 50(8), 460–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, D. W., Moore, S. A., Cunningham, P. M., & Cunningham, J. W. (1986). Developing readers and writers in the content areas, K–12. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B. (1991). Children’s nonfiction trade books: A complement to content area texts. The Reading Teacher, 45(1), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B. (2005). Making a case and a place for effective content area literacy instruction in the elementary grades. The Reading Teacher, 59(1), 46–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, B., & Newton, E. (2002). An examination of the informational text genre in basal readers. Reading Psychology, 23(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newport, J. F. (1965). The readability of science textbooks for elementary school. The Elementary School Journal, 66(1), 40–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, R. G., & Stewart, R. A. (1997). Nonfiction trade books in content area instruction: Realities and potential. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(8), 630–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, C. C. (2006). The information book genre: Its role in integrated science literacy research and practice. Reading Research Quarterly, 41(2), 226–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, R. J. (1999). A deafening silence: History textbooks and the students who read them. Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 315–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pentimonti, J. M., Zucker, T. A., Justice, L. M., & Kaderavek, J. N. (2010). Informational text use in pre-school classroom read alouds. The Reading Teacher, 63(8), 656–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sewall, G. T. (1988). American history textbooks: Where do we go from here? Phi Delta Kappan, 69(8), 552–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewall, G. T. (2005). Textbook publishing. Phi Delta Kappan, 86(7), 498–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sosniak, L. A., & Stodolsky, S. S. (1993). Teachers and textbooks: Materials use in four fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 93(3), 249–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spache, G. (1953). The new readability formula for primary-grade reading materials. The Elementary School Journal, 53(7), 410–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, H., & Woodward, A. (1989). Why students aren’t learning very much from textbooks. Educational Leadership, 47(3), 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson-Bernstein, H. (1988a). America’s textbook fiasco: A conspiracy of good intentions. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson-Bernstein, H. (1988b). The academy’s contribution to the impoverishment of America’s textbooks. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(3), 192–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C. (2006). Intertextuality in read-alouds of integrated science-literacy units in urban primary class rooms: Opportunities for the development of thought and language. Cognition and Instruction, 24(2), 211–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasquez, V. M. (2004). Negotiating critical literacies with young children. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, J. (1994). Effects of curriculum discourse style on eighth graders’ recall and problem solving in Earth Science. The Elementary School Journal, 94(3), 299–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A., & Elliot, D. L. (1990). Textbook use and teacher professionalism. In D. L. Elliot & A. Woodward (Eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the U.S (89th yearbook of the national society for the study of education, Part 1, pp. 178–193). Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E. (1983). The importance of terminology in teaching K–12 science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20(6), 577–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yopp, H. K., & Yopp, R. H. (2006). Primary students and informational texts. Science and Children, 44(3), 22–25.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hunter College, City University of New York, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA

    Nadine Bryce

Authors
  1. Nadine Bryce
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nadine Bryce .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Curtin University, Murray Street 78, Perth, WA 6000, Australia

    Myint Swe Khine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryce, N. (2013). Textual Features and Language Demands of Primary Grade Science Textbooks: The Call for More Informational Texts in Primary Grades. In: Khine, M. (eds) Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation