Skip to main content

Interpolation of Concentration Measurements by Kriging Using Flow Coordinates

  • Chapter
Book cover Geostatistics Oslo 2012

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 17))

Abstract

Groundwater contaminant plumes frequently display a curvilinear anisotropy, which conventional kriging and geostatistical simulation approaches fail to reproduce properly. In many applications, physically relevant coordinate transformations are used to modify the relationships between data points and simplify the specification of nonlinear anisotropy. In this paper, we present a kriging approach that uses a coordinate transformation to improve the interpolation of contaminant concentrations. The proposed alternative flow coordinates (AFC) consist in the hydraulic head and one (2D) or two (3D) streamline-based coordinates. In 2D, the mapping obtained using AFC is similar to that yielded by the natural coordinates of flow (i.e. hydraulic head and stream function). AFC can be generalized to 3D flow and to the presence of wells, which is not the case with the natural coordinates. The performance of the approach is investigated using a simple 3D synthetic case. Kriged concentration maps obtained with the AFC reproduce the curvilinear features found in the reference plume. Performance statistics suggest AFC improves plume delineation compared to conventional kriging on a Cartesian grid. However, the performance of the AFC transformation is limited by the fact that, while it accounts for advection, it does not consider the effects of dispersion on the shape of the plume. This aspect and further testing on complex cases is the subject of ongoing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Almendral A, Abrahamsen P, Hauge R (2008) Multidimensional scaling and anisotropic covariance functions. In: Proceedings of the eight international geostatistics congress, Santiago, Chile

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bailly J, Monestiez P, Lagacherie P (2006) Modelling spatial variability along drainage networks with geostatistics. Math Geol 38(5):515–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barabas N, Goovaerts P, Adriaens P (2001) Geostatistical assessment and validation of uncertainty for three-dimensional dioxin data from sediments in an estuarine river. Environ Sci Technol 35(16):3294–3301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boisvert JB, Deutsch CV (2011) Programs for kriging and sequential Gaussian simulation with locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances. Comput Geosci 37:495–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Boisvert JB, Manchuk JG, Deutsch CV (2009) Kriging in the presence of locally varying anisotropy using non-Euclidean distances. Math Geosci 41:585–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Christakos G, Hristopulos DT, Bogaert P (2000) On the physical geometry concept at the basis of space/time geostatistical hydrology. Adv Water Resour 23:799–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cirpka OA, Frind EO, Helmig R (1999) Numerical methods for reactive transport on rectangular and streamline-oriented grids. Adv Water Resour 22(7):711–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cirpka OA, Frind EO, Helmig R (1999) Streamline-oriented grid generation for transport modelling in two-dimensional domains including wells. Adv Water Resour 22(7):697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Curriero FC (1996) The use of non-Euclidean distances in geostatistics. PhD thesis, Kansas State University

    Google Scholar 

  10. Curriero FC (2006) On the use of non-Euclidean distance measures in geostatistics. Math Geol 38(8):907–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dagbert M, David M, Crozel D, Desbarats A (1984) Computing variograms in folded strata-controlled deposits. In: Vergy G, David M, Journel A, Marchal A (eds) Geostatistics for natural resources characterization. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 71–89

    Google Scholar 

  12. Deutsch C, Wang L (1996) Hierarchical object-based stochastic modeling of fluvial reservoirs. Math Geol 28(7):857–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deutsch CV (2002) Geostatistical reservoir modeling. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  14. de Fouquet C, Bernard-Michel C (2006) Modèles géostatistiques de concentrations ou de débits le long des cours d’eau. C R Géosci 338:307–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frind EO (1982) The principal direction technique: a new approach to groundwater contaminant transport modeling. In: Finite elements in water resources. Proceedings of the 4th international conference, Hanover, Germany, June 1982

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kohavi R, Provost F (1998) Glossary of terms. Mach Learn 30:271–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kubat M, Holte RC, Matwin S (1998) Machine learning for the detection of oil spills in satellite radar images. Mach Learn 30:195–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Legleiter CJ, Kyriakidis PC (2006) Forward and inverse transformation between Cartesian and channel-fitted coordinate systems for meandering rivers. Math Geol 38(8):927–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loland A, Host G (2003) Spatial covariance modelling in a complex coastal domain by multidimensional scaling. Environmetrics 14:307–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Matanga GB (1993) Stream functions in three-dimensional groundwater flow. Water Resour Res 29(9):3125–3133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Monestiez P, Sampson P, Guttorp P (1993) Modeling of heterogeneous spatial correlation structure by spatial deformation. Cah Géostat 3:35–46

    Google Scholar 

  22. Narasimhan TN (2008) Laplace equation and Faraday’s lines of force. Water Resour Res 44:W09412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rathbun SL (1998) Spatial modelling in irregularly shaped regions: kriging estuaries. Environmetrics 9(2):109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rivest M, Marcotte D, Pasquier P (2012) Sparse data integration for the interpolation of concentration measurements using kriging in natural coordinates. J Hydrol 416–417:72–82. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.11.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Sampson PD, Guttorp P (1992) Nonparametric-estimation of nonstationary spatial covariance structure. J Am Stat Assoc 87(417):108–119

    Google Scholar 

  26. te Stroet CBM, Snepvangers JJJC (2005) Mapping curvilinear structures with local anisotropy kriging. Math Geol 36:635–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thompson JF, Warsi ZUA, Mastin CW (1985) Numerical grid generation: foundations and applications. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ver Hoef JM, Peterson E, Theobald D (2006) Spatial statistical models that use flow and stream distance. Environ Ecol Stat 13:449–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu W (1996) Conditional curvilinear stochastic simulation using pixel-based algorithms. Math Geol 28:937–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this research was provided by a scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martine Rivest .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivest, M., Marcotte, D., Pasquier, P. (2012). Interpolation of Concentration Measurements by Kriging Using Flow Coordinates. In: Abrahamsen, P., Hauge, R., Kolbjørnsen, O. (eds) Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4153-9_42

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics