Skip to main content

Assessing Uncertainty in Recovery Functions: A Practical Approach

  • Chapter
Geostatistics Oslo 2012

Part of the book series: Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics ((QGAG,volume 17))

  • 2982 Accesses

Abstract

Recovery functions provide one of the most important tools in the mining industry for summarizing mineral inventory information of a deposit as a function of cut-off grades. They are also used in several stages of the deposit evaluation, including mine planning, financial decision making and management. Recovery functions are commonly obtained from block grade estimates or by mean of change of support techniques. However, these practices do not allow for an assessment of the underlying uncertainty associated with them. This limitation can be overcome by generating multiple conditional simulations of the deposit from which the recovery functions are computed. However, this approach is time consuming and may not be feasible for deposits modeled with a large number of blocks. In this paper, a technique is proposed for simulating recovery functions and assessing the corresponding uncertainty without recourse to conditional simulation. Its application in a number of deposits has shown that if the sole purpose is to assess the uncertainty in the recovery functions then the technique can be used to eliminate the necessity of carrying out multiple conditional simulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deraisme J, Roth C (2001) The information effect and estimating recoverable reserves. In: Kleingeld WJ, Krige DG (eds) Proceedings geostatistics 2000, Cape Town, Geostatistical Association of Southern Africa

    Google Scholar 

  2. Emery X (2007) On some consistency conditions for geostatistical change of support models. Math Geol 39(2):205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goovaerts P (1997) Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, 483 pp

    Google Scholar 

  4. Journel A, Kyriakidis P (2004) Evaluation of mineral reserves. A simulation approach. Oxford University Press, London, 216 pp

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lantuéjoul Ch (1994) Cours de Selectivité. Ecole des Mines de Paris, Centre de Geostatistique, Fontainebleau

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lantuéjoul Ch (1998) On the importance of choosing a change of support model for global reserves estimation. Math Geol 20(8):1001–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matheron G (1976) Forecasting block grade distributions: the transfer functions. In: Guarascio M et al. (eds) Advanced geostatistics in the mining industry, pp 151–239

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rivoirard J (1994) Introduction to disjuntive Kriging and non-linear geostatistics. Clarendon, Oxford, 180 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank professor Ute Mueller for her valuable help during the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Rondon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rondon, O. (2012). Assessing Uncertainty in Recovery Functions: A Practical Approach. In: Abrahamsen, P., Hauge, R., Kolbjørnsen, O. (eds) Geostatistics Oslo 2012. Quantitative Geology and Geostatistics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4153-9_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics