Skip to main content

The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics

Part of the book series: Advances in Business Ethics Research ((ABER,volume 2))

Abstract

This study examines the impact of a social desirability response bias as a personality characteristic (self- deception and impression management) and as an item characteristic (perceived desirability of the behavior) on self-reported ethical conduct. Findings from a sample of college students revealed that self-reported ethical conduct is associated with both personality and item characteristics, with perceived desirability of behavior having the greatest influence on self-reported conduct. Implications for research in business ethics are drawn, and suggestions are offered for reducing the effects of a socially desirable response bias.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold, J.H., and D.G. Feldman. 1981. Social desirability response bias in self-report choice situations. Academy of Management Journal 24: 377–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K.E. 1984. An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy 6: 627–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernreuter, R.G. 1933. Validity of the personality inventory. Personality Journal 11: 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, G.F., A.J. Tuchfarber, and R.W. Oldendick. 1986. Opinions on fictitious issues: The pressure to answer survey questions. Public Opinion Quarterly 50: 240–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradburn, N.M., S. Sudman, and Associates. 1979. Improving interview method and questionnaire design: Response effects to threatening questions in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradley, J.V. 1981. Overconfidence in ignorant experts. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 17(2): 82–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.J., and K.B. King. 1982. Small business ethics: Influences and perceptions. Journal of Small Business Management 20: 11–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicourel, A.V. 1964. Method and measurement in sociology. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, E., and P. Tongas. 1959. The social desirability of trait descriptive terms. Journal of Consulting Psychology 3: 361–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, V. 1966. Personality characteristics and social achievement behaviors associated with children’s social desirability response tendencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 447–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D.P. 1979. The experimental study of personality. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D.P., and D. Marlowe. 1960. A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology 24: 349–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D.P., and D. Marlowe. 1964. The approval motive. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demaio, T.J. 1984. Social desirability and survey measurement: A review. In Surveying subjective phenomena, vol. 2, ed. C.F. Turner and E. Martin, 257–282. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dohrenwend, B.P. 1966. Social status and psychiatric disorder: An issue of substance and an issue of method. American Sociological Review 23: 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, A. 1953. The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. Journal of Applied Psychology 37: 90–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrell, O.C., and K.M. Weaver. 1978. Ethical beliefs of marketing managers. Journal of Marketing 42(3): 69–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. 1967. Normative and reliability data for the standard and the cross-validated Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Psychological Reports 20: 174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, N. 1967. The social nature of psychological research. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganster, D.C., H.W. Hennessy, and F. Luthans. 1983. Social desirability response effects: Three alternative models. Academy of Management Journal 26(2): 321–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, C.S., and M. Crawford. 1974. Young executives: A source of new ethics? The Personnel Journal 53: 180–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gove, W.R., and M.P. Geerken. 1977. Response bias in surveys of mental health: An empirical examination. The American Journal of Sociology 82: 1289–1317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, S. L. 1990. The influence of professional role conflict and moral maturity on professionals’ reporting accuracy. Paper presented at the 1990 Academy of Management meetings, San Francisco, CA, August 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, R.M. 1989. Survey errors and survey costs. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humm, D.G., and K.A. Humm. 1944. Validity of the Humm-Wadsworth temperament scale: With consideration of the effects of subjects’ response-bias. Journal of Psychology 18: 55–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izraeli, D. 1988. Ethical beliefs and behavior among managers: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 7: 263–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, L.I., S.E. Berger, and J. Millham. 1970. Individual differences in cheating during a temptation period when confronting failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 15: 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, J.M., R.E. Stevens, and A.L. Bethke. 1987. Differences in ethical perceptions between male and female managers: Myth or reality? Journal of Business Ethics 6: 489–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, D.M., and O.C. Ferrell. 1981. The organizational ethics of advertising. Journal of Advertising 10(1): 21–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lautenschlager, G.J., and V.L. Flaherty. 1990. Computer administration of questions: More desirable or more social desirability? Journal of Applied Psychology 75(3): 310–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C.L., and D.H. Nagao. 1989. Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses. Journal of Applied Psychology 74(1): 72–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazen, A.M. 1990. The moderating role of social desirability, age, and experience in human judgment: Just how indirect is policy capturing? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 45: 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millham, J. 1974. Two components of need of approval score and their relationship to cheating following success and failure. Journal of Research in Personality 8: 378–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nederhof, A.J. 1985. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. European Journal of Social Psychology 15: 263–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newstrom, J.W., and W.A. Ruch. 1975. The ethics of management and the management of ethics. MSU Business Topics 23(Winter): 29–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newstrom, J.W., and W.A. Ruch. 1976. Managerial values underlying intra-organizational ethics. Atlanta Economic Review 26 (May–June): 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J.C. 1978. Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L. 1984. Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L. 1986. Self-deception and impression management in test responses. In Personality assessment via questionnaire: Current issues in theory and measurement, ed. A. Angleitner and J.S. Wiggins. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L. 1988. Development of the balanced inventory of desirable responding. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D.L. 1989. Measurement and control of response bias. In Measures of social-psychological attitudes, ed. J.P. Robinson, P.R. Shaver, and L. Wrightsman. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D.L., and K.J. Clancy. 1972. Some effects of ‘social desirability’ in survey studies. The American Journal of Sociology 77(5): 921–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, D.M., and A.M. Gibson. 1990. Methodology in business ethics research: A review and critical assessment. Journal of Business Ethics 9(6): 457–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riecken, H.W. 1962. A program for research on experiments in social psychology. In Values and groups, ed. N.F. Washburn. New York: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, E. 1956. Self-appraisal, personal desirability, and perceived social desirability of personality traits. Journal of Social Psychology 52: 151–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. 1966. Experimental effects in behavioral research. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruch, W.A., and J.W. Newstrom. 1975. How unethical are we?, Supervisory Management, pp. 16–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackeim, H.A., and R. Gur. 1978. Self-deception, self- confrontation and consciousness. In Consciousness and self-regulation: Advances in research, vol. 2, ed. G.E. Schwartz and D. Shapiro, 139–197. New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stem Jr., D.E., and R.K. Steinhorst. 1984. Telephone interview and mail questionnaire applications of the randomized response model. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79(387): 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G.E. 1984. Business ethics and social responsibility: The responses of present and future managers. Akron Business and Economic Review 15(3): 6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka-Matsumi, J., and V.A. Kameoka. 1986. Reliabilities and concurrent validities of popular self-report measures of depression, anxiety, and social desirability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 54: 328–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K. 1986. Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11(3): 601–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B., and J.B. Cullen. 1988. The organizational bases of ethical work climates. Administrative Science Quarterly 33: 101–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, J., and C. Rumrill. 1959. Social desirability in the MMPI and Welsh’s factor scales A and R. Journal of Consulting Psychology 23: 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, F. 1972. Methodological bias in public opinion surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 105–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zerbe, W.J., and D.L. Paulhus. 1987. Socially desirable responding in organizational behavior: A reconception. Academy of Management Journal 12(2): 250–264.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donna M. Randall .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A: Overclaiming Scale

Appendix A: Overclaiming Scale

  • How familiar are you with each of the following newly released movies?

    1. 1.

      Turned to Gold

    2. 2.

      Katherine’s Mistake

  • How familiar are you with each of the following products?

    1. 1.

      Microsoft Statistical Assistant

    2. 2.

      New Life Spices

  • How familiar are you with each of the following albums?

    1. 1.

      Cosmic Being

    2. 2.

      Offender After Dark

  • How familiar are you with each of the following TV programs?

    1. 1.

      The Adventures of Johnnie

    2. 2.

      Chicago Heat

  • How familiar are you with each of the following designer labels?

    1. 1.

      Ocean City

    2. 2.

      Jones L. A.

All answers provided with a five point Likert scale (1  =  not at all familiar, 3  =  somewhat familiar, and 5  =  very familiar).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Randall, D.M., Fernandes, M.F. (2013). The Social Desirability Response Bias in Ethics Research. In: Michalos, A., Poff, D. (eds) Citation Classics from the Journal of Business Ethics. Advances in Business Ethics Research, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4126-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics