Skip to main content

No-Till Agriculture in the USA

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Organic Fertilisation, Soil Quality and Human Health

Part of the book series: Sustainable Agriculture Reviews ((SARV,volume 9))

Abstract

No-till farming is a form of conservation tillage in which crops are seeded directly into the soil through previous crop residues, most commonly managing weeds using broad-spectrum herbicides and increasingly, transgenic herbicide-resistant crop varieties. Today, nearly a quarter of US cropland is farmed using no-tillage methods, a phenomenon which has been repeatedly described as one of the greatest agricultural revolutions of modern times. No-till advocates promote this method for its ability to reduce soil erosion, sequester soil carbon, reduce agricultural runoff, and improve farmland wildlife habitat, all while maintaining or even improving crop yields. Problems of water quality and contamination, as well as newly emerging problems associated with herbicide-resistant weeds, however, exist for no-till. This article reviews current literature on specific problems related to no-till agriculture, including soil and water impacts, soil carbon sequestration and ­greenhouse gases, and herbicide-resistant weeds; as well as the potential future of no-till farming and alternative no-till strategies that may address these problems.

The major points are the following. (1) No-till farming practices frequently result in increased soil organic matter content, soil moisture content, and soil biodiversity compared to conventional plow-tillage systems. Bulk soil density is often higher under no-tillage systems, but there is also greater macropore structure under no-till because of the preservation of earthworm burrows compared to conventional tillage systems. No-till’s net benefits for preserving soil structure and biota are well-described and demonstrated. (2) Although many no-till advocates have suggested no-till could make a significant contribution to mitigating anthropogenic climate change via soil carbon sequestration, the most current research indicates that no-till’s potential contribution to reducing anthropogenic contributions to global climate change is limited.

(3) Rainfall intensity and timing of chemical applications significantly impact water contamination from surface and subsurface runoff under no-till management. Because of increased macropore structure, no-till systems can result in increased transport of agrochemicals, nutrients, and animal wastes in subsurface water compared to conventional tillage practices. Increased subsurface transport of chemicals may pose environmental and public health threats in no-till agriculture systems. (4) The emergence of herbicide-resistant weeds in no-till systems presents a major risk to the success of ­current no-till practices, which are entirely reliant on chemical weed suppression. Alongside the need for rapid development of novel herbicides and the diversification of herbicide application regimes, other no-till agricultural methods, such as organic no-till agriculture and perennial grain agriculture systems, should be further developed and prioritized for research to meet the challenges of both preserving environmental water quality as well as reducing soil erosion while protecting future food security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackerman F (2007) The economics of atrazine. Int J Occup Environ Health 13:437–445

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baker JM, Ochsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis TJ (2007) Tillage and soil carbon sequestration – what do we really know? Agric Ecosyst Environ 118(1–4):1–5. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balfour Lady EB (1950) The living soil: evidence of the importance to human health of soil vitality, with special reference to national planning. Devin-Adair Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavin TK, Griffis TJ, Baker JM, Venterea RT (2009) Impact of reduced tillage and cover cropping on the greenhouse gas budget of a maize/soybean rotation ecosystem. Agric Ecosyst Environ 134(3–4):234–242. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2009.07.005

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2008) No-tillage and soil-profile carbon sequestration: an on-farm assessment. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72(3):693–701. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blevins RL, Smith MS, Thomas GW, Frye (1983) Influence of conservation tillage on soil properties. J Soil Water Conserv 38:301–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromfield L (1947) Malabar Farm. Harper and Brothers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromfield L (1988) In: Little CE (ed) Louis Bromfield at Malabar: writings on farming and country life. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull L, Delvo H, Sandretto C, Lindamood B (1993) Analysis of pesticide use by tillage system in 1990, 1991 and 1992 corn and soybeans. In: Agricultural resources: inputs situation and outlook report. Economic research service report AR-32, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Burwell RE, Kramer LA (1983) Long-term annual runoff and soil loss from conventional and conservation tillage of corn. J Soil Water Conserv 38:312–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannell RQ, Hawes JD (1994) Trends in tillage practices in relation to sustainable crop production with special reference to temperate climates. Soil Tillage Res 30:245–282. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(94)90007-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher SF, Lal R, Mishra U (2009) Regional study of no-till effects on carbon sequestration in the Midwestern United States. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73(1):207–216. doi:10.2136/sssaj2007.0336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen IB (1976a) The eighteenth-century origins of the concept of scientific revolution. J Hist Ideas 37:257–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen IB (1976b) Science and the growth of the American Republic. Rev Polit 38:359–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conservation Technology Innovation Center [CTIC] (1998) Crop residue management executive summary. Available http://www.ctic.purdue.edu/. Accessed 20 Dec 2009

  • Conway GR, Pretty JN (2009) Unwelcome harvest: agriculture and pollution. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Coughenour CM, Chamala S (2000) Conservation tillage and cropping innovation: constructing a new culture in agriculture. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cox CM, Garrett KA, Bockus WW (2005) Meeting the challenge of disease management in perennial grain cropping systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 20:15–24. doi:10.1079/RAF200495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox T, Glover J, Tassel DV (2006) Prospects for developing perennial grain crops. Bioscience 56(8):649–659. doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2006) 56[649:PFDPGC]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox T, Tassel DV, Cox CM, DeHaan LR (2010) Progress in breeding perennial grains. Crop Pasture Sci 61(7):513–521. doi:10.1071/CP09201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day JC, Hallahan CB, Sandretto CL, Lindamood WA (1999) Pesticide use in U.S. corn production: does conservation tillage make a difference? J Soil Water Conserv 54:477–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolan M, Clapp C, Allmaras R (2006) Soil organic carbon and nitrogen in a Minnesota soil as related to tillage, residue and nitrogen management. Soil Tillage Res. doi:10.1016/j.still.2005.07.015

  • Duke S, Powles S (2009) Glyphosate-resistant crops and weeds: now and in the future. Agbioforum 12(3–4):346–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards W, Shipitalo M (1993) Factors affecting preferential flow of water and atrazine through earthworm burrows under continuous no-till corn. J Environ Qual 22(3):453–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faulkner EH (1943) Plowman’s folly. Grosset and Dunlap, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett RS (1987) Overview of pest management for conservation tillage. In: Logan TJ, Davidson JM, Baker JL, Overcash MR (eds) Effects of conservation tillage on groundwater quality: nitrates and pesticides. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, pp 19–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Fawcett RS, Christensen BR, Tierney DP (1994) The impact of conservation tillage on pesticide runoff into surface waters: a review and analysis. J Soil Water Conserv 49:126–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng PCC, Tran M, Chui T, Sammons RD, Heck GR, Cajacob CA (2004) Investigations into glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis): retention, uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Sci 52:498–505. doi:10.1614/WS-03-137R

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fuglie K (1999) Conservation tillage and pesticide use in the Cornbelt. J Agric Appl Econ 31(1):133–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuoka M (1978) The one straw revolution: an introduction to natural farming. Rodale Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner JG, Nelson GC (2008) Herbicides, glyphosate resistance and acute mammalian toxicity: simulating an environmental effect of glyphosate-resistant weeds in the USA. Pest Manag Sci 64:470–478. doi:10.1002/ps.1497

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giller KE, Beare MH, Lavelle P, Izac AN, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 6:3–16. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(96)00149-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glover JD (2005) The necessity and possibility of perennial grain production systems. Renew Agric Food Syst 20:1–4. doi:10.1079/RAF200499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldburg RJ (1992) Environmental concerns with the development of herbicide-tolerant plants. Weed Technol 6:647–652

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grandy AS, Loecke TD, Parr S, Robertson GP (2006) Long-term trends in nitrous oxide emissions, soil nitrogen, and crop yields of till and no-till cropping systems. J Environ Qual 35(4):1487–1495. doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0166

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DR, Mannering JV, Moldenhauer WC (1977) Conservation tillage in the eastern Corn Belt. J Soil Water Conserv 32:20–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen LJ (1996) Crop residue effects on aerodynamic processes and wind erosion. Theor Appl Climatol 54(1–2):39–46. doi:10.1007/BF00863557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrold LL, Edwards WM (1974) No-tillage system reduces erosion from continuous corn water sheds. Trans ASAE 17:414–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle M (1983) Problems with conservation tillage. J Soil Water Conserv 38:201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Horrigan L (2002) How sustainable agriculture can address the environmental and human health harms of industrial agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 110(5):445–456

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard Sir A (1940) An agricultural testament. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Isensee AR, Sadeghi AM (1993) Impact of tillage practice on runoff and pesticide transport. J Soil Water Conserv 48:523–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail I, Blevins RL, Frye WW (1994) Long-Term No-tillage Effects on Soil Properties and Continuous Corn Yields. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58(1):193. doi:10.2136/sssaj1994.0361599500­5800010028x

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson W, Owen M, Kruger G (2009) US farmer awareness of glyphosate-resistant weeds and resistance management strategies. Weed Technol 23:308–312. doi:10.1614/WT-08-181.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapusta G, Krausz RF, Matthews JL (1996) Corn Yield is Equal in Conventional, Reduced, and No Tillage after 20 Years. Agro J 88(5):812. doi:10.2134/agronj1996.00021962008800050021x

    Google Scholar 

  • King AD (1983) Progress in no-till. J Soil Water Conserv 38:160–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Kladivko EJ (2001) Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil Tillage Res 61:61–76. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00179-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kladivko EJ, Akhouri NM, Weesies G (1997) Earthworm populations and species distributions under no-till and conventional tillage in Indiana and Illinois. Soil Biol Biochem 29:613–615. doi:10.1016/S0038-0717(96)00187-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kravchenko AN, Robertson CP (2011) Whole-profile soil carbon stocks: the danger of assuming too much from analyses of too little. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75(1):235–240. doi:10.2136/sssaj2010.0076

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1989) Long-term tillage and wheel traffic effects on a poorly drained mollic ochraqualf in northwest Ohio. 1. Soil physical properties, root distribution and grain yield of corn and soybean. Soil Tillage Res 14(4):341–358. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(89)90054-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (1997) Residue management, conservation tillage and soil restoration for mitigating greenhouse effect by CO2-enrichment. Soil Tillage Res 43:81–107. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(97)00036-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304(5677):1623–1627. doi:10.1126/science.1097396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R (2009) The plow and agricultural sustainability. J Sustain Agric 33:66–84. doi:10.1080/10440040802548555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Logan TJ, Fausy NR (1989) Long-term tillage and wheel traffic effects on a poorly drained mollic ochraqualf in northwest Ohio. 2. Infiltrability, surface runoff, sub-surface flow and sediment transport. Soil Tillage Res 14:359–373. doi:10.1016/0167-1987(89)90055-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Mahboubi AA, Fausey NR (1994) Long-term tillage and rotation effects on properties of a central Ohio soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 58:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lal R, Griffin M, Apt J, Lave L, Morgan MG (2004) Managing soil carbon. Science 304:393. doi:10.1126/science.1093079

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Little CE (1987) Green fields forever: the conservation tillage revolution in America. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke MA, Bryson CT (1997) Herbicide-soil interactions in reduced tillage and plant residue management systems. Weed Sci 45:307–320

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lokemoen JT, Beiser JA (1997) Bird use and nesting in conventional, minimum-tillage, and organic cropland. J Wildl Manag 61:644–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Z, Wang E, Sun OJ (2010) Can no-tillage stimulate carbon sequestration in agricultural soils? A meta-analysis of paired experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 139(1–2):224–231. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.08.006

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mahboubi AA, Lal R, Faussey NR (1993) Twenty-eight years of tillage effects on two soils in Ohio. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:506–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone RW, Logsdon S, Shipitalo MJ, Weatherington-Rice J, Ahuja L, Ma L (2003) Tillage effect on macroporosity and herbicide transport in percolate. Geoderma 116:191–215. doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00101-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marx L (1964) The machine in the garden: technology and the pastoral idea in America. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mijangos I, Pérez R, Albizu I, Garbisu C (2006) Effects of fertilization and tillage on soil biological parameters. Enzyme Microb Technol 40:100–106. doi:10.1016/j.enzmictec.2005.10.043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR (2007) Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:13268–13272. doi:10.1073/pnas.0611508104

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR (2008) Agriculture’s no-till revolution? J Soil Water Conserv 63:64A–65A. doi:10.2489/jswc.63.3.64A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Wright G (1992) The rise and fall of American technological leadership: the postwar era in historical perspective. J Econ Lit 30:1931–1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouédraogo S, Bertelson MK (1997) The value of research on indigenous knowledge: preliminary evidence from the case of Zaï in Burkina Faso. J Sustain Agric 10:33–42. doi:10.1300/J064v10n01_05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips DL, Hardin PD, Benson VW, Baglio JV (1993) Nonpoint source pollution impacts of alternative agricultural management practices in Illinois: a simulation study. J Soil Water Conserv 48:449–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Powles S (2008a) Evolved glyphosate-resistant weeds around the world: lessons to be learnt. Pest Manag Sci 64:360–365. doi:10.1002/ps.1525

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Powles S (2008b) Evolution in action: glyphosate-resistant weeds threaten world crops. Outlook Pest Manag 19(6):256–259. doi:19:6. 10.1564/19dec07

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powlson DS, Whitmore AP, Goulding KWT (2011) Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. Eur J Soil Sci 62(1):42–55. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raczkowski CW, Reyes MR, Reddy GB, Busscher WJ, Bauer PJ (2009) Comparison of conventional and no-tillage corn and soybean production on runoff and erosion in the southeastern US Piedmont. J Soil Water Conserv 64:53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen WD (1983–1984) New deal agricultural policies after fifty years. Minn Law Rev 68:368–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie JC, Follet RF (1983) Conservation tillage: where to from here? J Soil Water Conserv 38:267–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodale JI (1945) Pay dirt: farming and gardening with composts. Devin-Adair Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers RD, Wooley JB (1983) Conservation tillage impacts on wildlife. J Soil Water Conserv 38:212–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodhe H, (1990) A comparison of the contribution of various gases to the greenhouse effect. Science. 248(4960):1217–1219. doi: 10.1126/science.248.4960.1217

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipitalo MJ, Gibbs F (2000) Potential of earthworm burrows to transmit injected animal wastes to tile drains. Soil Sci Soc Am J 64:2103–2109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shipitalo MJ, Dick WA, Edwards WM (2000) Conservation tillage and macropore factors that affect water movement and the fate of chemicals. Soil Tillage Res 53:167–183. doi:10.1016/S0167-1987(99)00104-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen J, Posner J, Rosemeyer M, Baldock J (2010) Endogeic and anecic earthworm abundance in six Midwestern cropping systems. Appl Soil Ecol 44:147–155. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2009.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smika DE, Sharman ED (1983) Atrazine carryover in conservation tillage systems. J Soil Water Conserv 38:239

    Google Scholar 

  • Soule JD, Piper JK (1992) Farming in nature’s image: an ecological approach to agriculture. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague MA (1986) Overview. In: Sprague MA, Triplett GB (eds) No-tillage and surface-tillage agriculture: the tillage revolution. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sprague MA, Triplett GB (eds) (1986) No-tillage and surface-tillage agriculture: the tillage revolution. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton P, Wallinga D, Perron J, Gottlieb M, Sayre L, Woodruff T (2011) Reproductive health and the industrialized food system: a point of intervention for health policy. Health Aff 30(5):888–897. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2010.1255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syswerda SP, Corbin AT, Mokma DL, Kravchenko AN, Robertson GP (2011) Agricultural management and soil carbon storage in surface vs. deep layers. Soil Sci Soc Am J 75(1):92–101. doi:10.2136/sssaj2009.0414

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Triplett GB, Dick WA (2008) No-tillage crop production: a revolution in agriculture! Agron J 100:S-153–S-165. doi:10.2134/agronj2007.0005c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS) (2011) Adoption of genetically engineered crops in the U.S. Available from http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/BiotechCrops/. Accessed 10 May 2011

  • Uri ND, Atwood JD, Sanabria J (1999) The environmental benefits and costs of conservation tillage. Environ Geol 38:111–125. doi:10.1007/s002540050407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Werf HMG (1996) Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 60:81–96. doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01096-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton DB, Klimstra WD (1984) Wildlife use of no-till and conventionally tilled corn fields. J Soil Water Conserv 39:327–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Weersink A, Walker M, Swanton C, Shaw JE (1992) Costs of conventional and conservation tillage systems. J Soil Water Conserv 47:328–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt RC, Burwell RE (1985) Runoff and soil losses for conventional, reduced, and no-till corn. J Soil Water Conserv 40:450–454

    Google Scholar 

  • West TO, Post WM (2002) Soil organic carbon sequestration rates by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66(6):1930–1946. doi:10.2136/sssaj2002.1930

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson D, Ulsh CZ (2007) Down and dirty details of our 2006 organic no-till success, [Online]. Available: http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/researchers_roll_out_the_details_of_2006. Accessed 5 Jan 2010

  • Yates AG, Bailey RC, Schwindt JA (2006) No-till cultivation improves stream ecosystem quality. J Soil Water Conserv 61:14–19

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank Professor John Boardman for his encouragement and suggestions in the process of drafting this review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared Margulies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Margulies, J. (2012). No-Till Agriculture in the USA. In: Lichtfouse, E. (eds) Organic Fertilisation, Soil Quality and Human Health. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 9. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4113-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics