Abstract
Numerical weather prediction (NWP) is the foundation for modern day weather forecasting. The focus of this chapter is on what NWP brings to the table when forecasting in areas of complex terrain – where it succeeds, where it fails, and how the forecaster can best use the guidance it provides. The role of the forecaster is highlighted throughout, together with reflections on alternative methods and forecasting approaches that can be used to optimize forecast quality.--> This chapter describes the advancement of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and the role of the mountain weather forecaster in the forecast process. The chapter begins with a historical perspective of the roles NWP and the forecaster have played. This ranges from the time when models could only resolve the largest terrain features, to the present where models have shed light on processes and helped forecasters better understand features over complex terrain and improve their conceptual models. The issue of atmospheric predictability is addressed along with the inherent challenges facing the mountain weather forecaster. In some cases complex terrain actually extends predictability while for others predictability limits are relatively short and skillful forecasts are limited to hours rather than days. For each case the forecasters need to be able to recognize the salient processes and understand the differences in predictability. They must also understand the strengths and weaknesses of NWP and communicate appropriately the uncertainty of the forecast. As forecast interests expand to specific locations over a larger domain – especially in complex terrain – post processing of mesoscale NWP has become even more important. This is discussed together with a number of methodologies for downscaling NWP. Commensurate with this trend in NWP is the need for detailed observations that match current forecast resolutions. This is followed by a discussion of forecast tools and the role of the forecaster with respect to NWP. It is argued that the optimal forecast approach today is a blend of subjective techniques and statistical post-processing of NWP solutions, combined with local forecasting tools and cognitive experience. Finally, the role of the mountain weather forecaster in field programs (e.g., the Winter Olympics) gives a glimpse into the future for what may become routine. These programs shed insight into predictability limits and provide an opportunity to evaluate new observing systems, tools and approaches. The chapter ends with a vision for the future for the research and operational communities. Further exploration into mesoscale ensemble prediction and objective analysis in complex terrain, among other areas, is needed so researchers can improve mountain weather forecasting. Meanwhile, forecasters need to be open to these new advances and recognize that while their role will continue to evolve, it will also continue to be of value to society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anthes, R. A., Y.-H. Kuo, D. Baumhefner, R. M. Errico and T. W. Bettge, 1985: Predictability of mesoscale atmospheric motions. Advances in Geophysics, 28B, 159--202.
Berri, G. J., and J. Paegle, 1990: Sensitivity of Local Predictions to Initial Conditions. J. Applied Meteor., 29, 256-267.
Boer, G.J., 2003: Predictability as a Function of Scale. Atmosphere-Ocean, 41 (3) 2003, 203–215.
Bowler, N. E., A. Arribas, S. E. Beare, K. R. Mylne, and G. J. Shutts, 2009. The local ETKF and SKEB: Upgrades to the MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system. QJRMS, 35: 767-776.
Candille, G., 2009: The Multiensemble Approach: The NAEFS Example. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 5, 1655-1665
Colman, B. R., and C.F. Dierking, 1992: The Taku Wind of Southeast Alaska: Its Identification and Prediction. Wea. Forecasting, 7, 49-64.
Dallavalle, J. P., and B. Glahn, 2005: Toward a Gridded MOS System. Preprints, 21 st Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Washington, D. C., Amer. Meteor. Soc.
Gilbert, K. K., B. Glahn, R. L. Cosgrove, K. L. Sheets, and G. A. Wagner, 2009: Gridded model output statistics: Improving and expanding. Preprints, 23rd Conf. Weather Analysis and Forecasting and 19th Conf. Numerical Prediction, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc.
Glahn, B., K. Gilbert, R. Cosgrove, D. Ruth, and K. Sheets (2009): The Gridding of MOS. Wea. Forecasting, 2, 520-519.
Hart, K. A., W. J. Steenburgh, and D. J. Onton, 2005: Model Forecast Improvements with Decreased Horizontal Grid Spacing over Finescale Intermountain Orography during the 2002 Olympic Winter Games, Wea. Forecasting, 20, 558-576.
Horel, J., T. Potter, L. Dunn, W. J. Steenburgh, M. Eubank, M. Splitt, and D. J. Onton, 2002: Weather Support for the 2002 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., Feb., 227-240.
Lorenz, E. N., 1969: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion.
Tellus, 21, 289-307.
Mailhot, J., S. Bélair, M. Charron, P. Joe, M. Abrahamowicz, N. B. Bernier, G. A. Isaac, R. McTaggart-Cowan, J. Milbrandt, C. Doyle, B. Denis, A. Erfani, R. Frenette, A. Giguère, N. McLennan, and L. Tong, 2010: Environment Canada's Experimental Numerical Weather Prediction Systems for the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, Issue 1, 31-36
Mass, C. F., D. Ovens, K. Westrick, B. Colle, 2002: Does Increasing Horizontal Resolution Produce More Skillful Forecasts? Bul. Amer. Meteor. Soc., Volume 83, Issue 3, 407-430.
Mass, C. F., M. Albright, D. Ovens, R. Steed, M. MacIver, E. Grimit, T. Eckel, B. Lamb, J. Vaughan, K. Westrick, P. Storck, B. Colman, C. Hill, N. Maykut, M. Gilroy, S. A. Ferguson, J. Yetter, J. M. Sierchio, C. Bowman, R. Stender, R. Wilson, and W. Brown, 2003: Regional Environmental Prediction Over the Pacific Northwest. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 1353-1366.
Mass, C. F., J. Baars, G. Wedam, E. Grimit, and R. Steed, 2008: Removal of Systematic Model Bias on a Model Grid. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 438-459.
Mass, C.F. and Y.-H. Kuo, 1998: Regional real-time numerical weather prediction: Current status and future potential. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 253–263.
Raftery, A. E., T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, M.Polakowski, 2005: Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 5, 1155-1174
Reinecke, P.A., and D. R. Durran, 2009: Initial condition sensitivities and the predictability of downslope winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3401-3418.
Stauffer, D. R., G. K. Hunter, A. Deng, J. R. Zielonka, K. Tinklepaugh, P. Hayes, and C. Kiley, 2007: On the role of atmospheric data assimilation and model resolution on model forecast accuracy for the Torino Winter Games. Preprints, 22 nd Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting and 18 th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, 25-29 June 2007, Park City, UT, Amer. Meteor. Soc.
Teakles, A, C. Dierking, and N. McLennan, 2009. Strong outflow events affecting the 2010 Olympic venues in the Callaghan Valley. Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 31 May – 4 June 2009.
Vukicevic, T., and R.M. Errico. 1990. The Influence of Artificial and Physical Factors upon Predictability Estimates Using a Complex Limited-Area Model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1460-1482.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Editors (Fotini Katopodes Chow, Stephan F.J. de Wekker, and Bradley J. Snyder) for their invitation to write this chapter, their tireless efforts to get it to press, and their leadership in helping to organize the Workshop and meetings. We would also like to thank reviewers Mike Angove, Clifford Mass and Ron Goodson for their many helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colman, B., Cook, K., Snyder, B.J. (2013). Numerical Weather Prediction and Weather Forecasting in Complex Terrain. In: Chow, F., De Wekker, S., Snyder, B. (eds) Mountain Weather Research and Forecasting. Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4098-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4098-3_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4097-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4098-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)