Skip to main content

Numerical Weather Prediction and Weather Forecasting in Complex Terrain

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mountain Weather Research and Forecasting

Part of the book series: Springer Atmospheric Sciences ((SPRINGERATMO))

Abstract

Numerical weather prediction (NWP) is the foundation for modern day weather forecasting. The focus of this chapter is on what NWP brings to the table when forecasting in areas of complex terrain – where it succeeds, where it fails, and how the forecaster can best use the guidance it provides. The role of the forecaster is highlighted throughout, together with reflections on alternative methods and forecasting approaches that can be used to optimize forecast quality.--> This chapter describes the advancement of numerical weather prediction (NWP) models and the role of the mountain weather forecaster in the forecast process. The chapter begins with a historical perspective of the roles NWP and the forecaster have played. This ranges from the time when models could only resolve the largest terrain features, to the present where models have shed light on processes and helped forecasters better understand features over complex terrain and improve their conceptual models. The issue of atmospheric predictability is addressed along with the inherent challenges facing the mountain weather forecaster. In some cases complex terrain actually extends predictability while for others predictability limits are relatively short and skillful forecasts are limited to hours rather than days. For each case the forecasters need to be able to recognize the salient processes and understand the differences in predictability. They must also understand the strengths and weaknesses of NWP and communicate appropriately the uncertainty of the forecast. As forecast interests expand to specific locations over a larger domain – especially in complex terrain – post processing of mesoscale NWP has become even more important. This is discussed together with a number of methodologies for downscaling NWP. Commensurate with this trend in NWP is the need for detailed observations that match current forecast resolutions. This is followed by a discussion of forecast tools and the role of the forecaster with respect to NWP. It is argued that the optimal forecast approach today is a blend of subjective techniques and statistical post-processing of NWP solutions, combined with local forecasting tools and cognitive experience. Finally, the role of the mountain weather forecaster in field programs (e.g., the Winter Olympics) gives a glimpse into the future for what may become routine. These programs shed insight into predictability limits and provide an opportunity to evaluate new observing systems, tools and approaches. The chapter ends with a vision for the future for the research and operational communities. Further exploration into mesoscale ensemble prediction and objective analysis in complex terrain, among other areas, is needed so researchers can improve mountain weather forecasting. Meanwhile, forecasters need to be open to these new advances and recognize that while their role will continue to evolve, it will also continue to be of value to society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anthes, R. A., Y.-H. Kuo, D. Baumhefner, R. M. Errico and T. W. Bettge, 1985: Predictability of mesoscale atmospheric motions. Advances in Geophysics, 28B, 159--202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berri, G. J., and J. Paegle, 1990: Sensitivity of Local Predictions to Initial Conditions. J. Applied Meteor., 29, 256-267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boer, G.J., 2003: Predictability as a Function of Scale. Atmosphere-Ocean, 41 (3) 2003, 203–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, N. E., A. Arribas, S. E. Beare, K. R. Mylne, and G. J. Shutts, 2009. The local ETKF and SKEB: Upgrades to the MOGREPS short-range ensemble prediction system. QJRMS, 35: 767-776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Candille, G., 2009: The Multiensemble Approach: The NAEFS Example. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 5, 1655-1665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman, B. R., and C.F. Dierking, 1992: The Taku Wind of Southeast Alaska: Its Identification and Prediction. Wea. Forecasting, 7, 49-64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallavalle, J. P., and B. Glahn, 2005: Toward a Gridded MOS System. Preprints, 21 st Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, Washington, D. C., Amer. Meteor. Soc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, K. K., B. Glahn, R. L. Cosgrove, K. L. Sheets, and G. A. Wagner, 2009: Gridded model output statistics: Improving and expanding. Preprints, 23rd Conf. Weather Analysis and Forecasting and 19th Conf. Numerical Prediction, Omaha, NE, Amer. Meteor. Soc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glahn, B., K. Gilbert, R. Cosgrove, D. Ruth, and K. Sheets (2009): The Gridding of MOS. Wea. Forecasting, 2, 520-519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K. A., W. J. Steenburgh, and D. J. Onton, 2005: Model Forecast Improvements with Decreased Horizontal Grid Spacing over Finescale Intermountain Orography during the 2002 Olympic Winter Games, Wea. Forecasting, 20, 558-576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horel, J., T. Potter, L. Dunn, W. J. Steenburgh, M. Eubank, M. Splitt, and D. J. Onton, 2002: Weather Support for the 2002 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., Feb., 227-240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, E. N., 1969: The predictability of a flow which possesses many scales of motion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellus, 21, 289-307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mailhot, J., S. Bélair, M. Charron, P. Joe, M. Abrahamowicz, N. B. Bernier, G. A. Isaac, R. McTaggart-Cowan, J. Milbrandt, C. Doyle, B. Denis, A. Erfani, R. Frenette, A. Giguère, N. McLennan, and L. Tong, 2010: Environment Canada's Experimental Numerical Weather Prediction Systems for the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic and Paralympic Games. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 91, Issue 1, 31-36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mass, C. F., D. Ovens, K. Westrick, B. Colle, 2002: Does Increasing Horizontal Resolution Produce More Skillful Forecasts? Bul. Amer. Meteor. Soc., Volume 83, Issue 3, 407-430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mass, C. F., M. Albright, D. Ovens, R. Steed, M. MacIver, E. Grimit, T. Eckel, B. Lamb, J. Vaughan, K. Westrick, P. Storck, B. Colman, C. Hill, N. Maykut, M. Gilroy, S. A. Ferguson, J. Yetter, J. M. Sierchio, C. Bowman, R. Stender, R. Wilson, and W. Brown, 2003: Regional Environmental Prediction Over the Pacific Northwest. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 84, 1353-1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mass, C. F., J. Baars, G. Wedam, E. Grimit, and R. Steed, 2008: Removal of Systematic Model Bias on a Model Grid. Wea. Forecasting, 23, 438-459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mass, C.F. and Y.-H. Kuo, 1998: Regional real-time numerical weather prediction: Current status and future potential. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 253–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raftery, A. E., T. Gneiting, F. Balabdaoui, M.Polakowski, 2005: Using Bayesian Model Averaging to Calibrate Forecast Ensembles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 5, 1155-1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, P.A., and D. R. Durran, 2009: Initial condition sensitivities and the predictability of downslope winds. J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 3401-3418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, D. R., G. K. Hunter, A. Deng, J. R. Zielonka, K. Tinklepaugh, P. Hayes, and C. Kiley, 2007: On the role of atmospheric data assimilation and model resolution on model forecast accuracy for the Torino Winter Games. Preprints, 22 nd Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting and 18 th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, 25-29 June 2007, Park City, UT, Amer. Meteor. Soc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teakles, A, C. Dierking, and N. McLennan, 2009. Strong outflow events affecting the 2010 Olympic venues in the Callaghan Valley. Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 31 May – 4 June 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vukicevic, T., and R.M. Errico. 1990. The Influence of Artificial and Physical Factors upon Predictability Estimates Using a Complex Limited-Area Model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 118, 1460-1482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Editors (Fotini Katopodes Chow, Stephan F.J. de Wekker, and Bradley J. Snyder) for their invitation to write this chapter, their tireless efforts to get it to press, and their leadership in helping to organize the Workshop and meetings. We would also like to thank reviewers Mike Angove, Clifford Mass and Ron Goodson for their many helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brad Colman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colman, B., Cook, K., Snyder, B.J. (2013). Numerical Weather Prediction and Weather Forecasting in Complex Terrain. In: Chow, F., De Wekker, S., Snyder, B. (eds) Mountain Weather Research and Forecasting. Springer Atmospheric Sciences. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4098-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics