Abstract
A major turning point in the direction of New Zealand’s school system came with the introduction of the Tomorrow’s Schools reforms in the late 1980s. Throughout the following 20 years of directing and redirecting the focus of schools, the nature and expectations of school leadership at each level have been substantially redefined. Courses of action intended to improve performance and system efficiencies are dependent on proven leadership at each level for their success. In modern systems, rather than being ‘one-off’ events, the reforms have tended to become a modus operandi that not only requires leadership that keeps pace with the direction of reforms and gives them effect in practice but also requires investment in ongoing inquiry into how leadership capability is developed and demonstrated in accordance with the system goals. The system, therefore, has a vested interest in shaping the meaning and nature of school leadership. This chapter describes the reforms that have set the context for redefining school leadership in New Zealand, followed by accounts of policy and other initiatives intended to align leadership theory and practice with system imperatives. The responses to these developments and changes are analyzed and discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
National Standards were enacted into law by Government within 6 weeks of taking office.
References
Caldwell, B. J. & Spinks, J. M. (1988). The self-managing school. London: The Falmer Press.
Crooks, T. (2003). Some criteria for intelligent accountability applied to accountability in New Zealand. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, April 2003.
Codd, J. (1999). Educational reform, accountability, and the culture of distrust. In M. Thrupp (Ed.), A decade of reform in New Zealand: Where to now? (pp. 45–53). Waikato: School of Education.
Deal, T. E. & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Department of Education. (1988). Administering for excellence: Effective administration in education (Picot Report). Wellington: Government Printer.
Education Counts. (a). Retrieved from http://www.educationcounts.govt.nz/publications/series/2523/57149/6. Accessed 26 January 2011.
Education Review Office. (a). ERO’s role in New Zealand. Retrieved from http://www.ero.govt.nz/About-ERO/ERO-s-Role-in-New-Zealand. Accessed 26 January 2011.
Education Review Office. (b). Evaluation indicators for school reviews (DRAFT) June 2010. Wellington: New Zealand Government.
Gardner, J. W. (2007). The nature of leadership. In the Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hattie, J. (2010). Horizons and whirlpools: The well travelled pathway of national standards. Unpublished paper.
McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M. J., & Morison, P. (Eds.). (1997). Educating one and all: Students with disabilities and standards-based reform. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
McDowell, J. O. & Buckner, K. G. (2002). Leading with emotion. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Ministry of Education. (2007a). New Zealand country report on improving school leadership: OECD background report. Retrieved from http://www.educationalleaders.govt.nz/Leading-change/Future-schools-and-innovation/OECD-Report-Improving-School-Leadership. Accessed 20 January 2011.
Ministry of Education. (2007b). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media Ltd.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Kiwi leadership for school principals. Principals as educational leaders. Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2010). Ministry of education output plan between The Minister of Education, The Minister of Tertiary Education and The Secretary for Education (30 June 2010). Wellington: Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (a). Performance management systems. Retrieved from http://www.minedu.govt.nz/NZEducation/EducationPolicies/Schools/SchoolOperations/EmploymentConditionsAndEvaluation/PerformanceManagementSystems/. Accessed 20 January 2011.
Mulford, W., Silinis, H., & Leithwood, K. (2004). Educational leadership for organisational learning and improved student outcomes. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Riley, K. A. (1988). Whose school is it anyway? London: Falmer Press.
Robinson, V., Hohepa, M., & Lloyd, C. (2009). School leadership and student outcomes: Identifying what works and why best evidence synthesis Iteration. Wellington: New Zealand Ministry of Education.
Tschannen-Moran, M. (2007). Becoming a trustworthy leader. In the Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Wylie, C. & Hodgen, E. (2010). NZCER 2010 primary and intermediate schools national survey. Wellington: New Zealand Council for Educational Research.
Wyse, D., McCreery, E., & Torrance, H. (2008). The trajectory and impact of national reform: Curriculum and assessment in English primary schools. Cambridge Primary Review Research Briefings 3/2. Retrieved from http://www.primaryreview.org.uk/. Accessed Feb. 2001.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix: National Administration Guidelines (NAGs) 2009 version
Appendix: National Administration Guidelines (NAGs) 2009 version
NAG. 1
Each Board of Trustees is required to foster student achievement by providing teaching and learning programs which incorporate The National Curriculum as expressed in The Ministry of Education (2007b) or Te Marautanga o Aotearoa.
Each board, through the principal and staff, is required to:
-
a.
Develop and implement teaching and learning programs:
-
1.
To provide all students of age 1–10 years with opportunities to achieve for success in all areas of the National Curriculum ;
-
2.
Giving priority to student achievement in literacy and numeracy, especially in years 1–8;
-
3.
Giving priority to regular quality physical activity that develops movement skills for all students, especially of age 1–6 years.
-
1.
-
b.
Through a range of assessment practices, gather information that is sufficiently comprehensive to enable the progress and achievement of students to be evaluated; giving priority first to:
-
1.
Student achievement in literacy and numeracy, especially in years 1–8; and then to
-
2.
Breadth and depth of learning related to the needs, abilities, and interests of students, the nature of the school’s curriculum, and the scope of The National Curriculum as expressed in The New Zealand Curriculum or Te Marautanga o Aotearoa;
-
1.
-
c.
on the basis of good quality assessment information, identify students and groups of students:
-
1.
Who are not achieving;
-
2.
Who are at risk of not achieving;
-
3.
Who have special needs; and
-
4.
Aspects of the curriculum which require particular attention;
-
1.
-
d.
Develop and implement teaching and learning strategies to address the needs of students and aspects of the curriculum identified in (c) above;
-
e.
In consultation with the school’s Māori community, develop and make known to the school’s community policies, plans, and targets for improving the achievement of Māori students; and
-
f.
Provide appropriate career education and guidance for all students of age 7 years and above, with a particular emphasis on specific career guidance for those students who have been identified by the school as being at risk of leaving school unprepared for the transition to the workplace or further education/training.
NAG 2 (Planning, Self-Review, and Reporting)
Each board of trustees, with the principal and teaching staff, is required to:
-
a.
Develop a strategic plan which documents how they are giving effect to the National Education Guidelines through their policies, plans, and programs, including those for curriculum, National Standards, assessment, and staff professional development;
-
b.
Maintain an ongoing program of self-review in relation to the above policies, plans, and programs, including evaluation of information on student achievement; and
-
c.
Report to students and their parents on the achievement of individual students, and to the school’s community on the achievement of students as a whole and of groups (identified through NAG 1(c) above) including the achievement of Māori students against the plans and targets referred to in 1(e) above.
NAG 2A (National Standards)
Where a school has students enrolled in years 1–8, the board of trustees, with the principal and teaching staff, is required to use National Standards to:
-
a.
Report to students and their parents on the student’s progress and achievement in relation to National Standards. Reporting to parents in plain language in writing must be at least twice a year;
-
b.
Report school-level data in the board’s annual report on National Standards under three headings:
-
1.
School strengths and identified areas for improvement;
-
2.
The basis for identifying areas for improvement; and
-
3.
Planned actions for lifting achievement.
-
1.
-
c.
Report in the board’s annual report on:
-
1.
The numbers and proportions of students at, above, below, or well below the standards, including by Māori, Pasifika, and by gender (where this does not breach an individual’s privacy); and
-
2.
How students are progressing against the standards as well as how they are achieving.
-
1.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Flockton, L. (2012). The Shape and Shaping of School Leadership in Aotearoa New Zealand. In: Volante, L. (eds) School Leadership in the Context of Standards-Based Reform. Studies in Educational Leadership, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4095-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4095-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4094-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4095-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)