Advertisement

Deviant Peers and Delinquency: The Influence of Classroom Context

  • Chyi-In WuEmail author
  • Man-Kit Lei
Chapter
Part of the Quality of Life in Asia book series (QLAS, volume 2)

Abstract

In recent years, researchers have looked toward distinguishing the routes whereby some daily social contexts influence adolescent development. In considering these contexts, this study identified three hypotheses to illustrate the theoretical assumptions related to the mechanism for adolescents to develop delinquency. The results, essentially, fully supported the theoretical hypotheses. The most important finding of the results is that, for Taiwanese adolescent students, the classroom context did have a crucial influence on their development of conduct problems. In addition, the HLM analyses indicated that individual-level deviant peers is positively associated with adolescent students’ delinquency. Furthermore, we also found that the effect of classroom-level delinquency amplifies the effect of deviant peers on adolescents’ delinquency. These findings offer insight into understanding the importance of classroom contexts for Taiwanese and even for East Asian students in general.

Keywords

Delinquent Behavior Hierarchical Linear Model Deviant Behavior Collective Efficacy Friendship Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ary, D. V., Duncan, T. E., Biglan, A., Metzler, C. W., Noell, J. W., & Smolkowski, K. (1999). Development of adolescent problem behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 27, 141–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrera, M., Jr., Prelow, H. M., Dumka, L. E., Gonzales, N. A., Knight, G. P., Michaels, M. L., et al. (2002). Pathways from family economic conditions to adolescents’ distress: Supportive parenting, stressors outside the family, and deviant peers. Journal of Community Psychology, 30, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan, T., & Huizinga, D. (1975). Theory validation and aggregate national data: Integration report of OYD research FY 1975 (Vol. 12). Boulder: Behavior Research and Evaluation Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Brody, G. H., Conger, R., Gibbons, F. X., Ge, X., Murry, V. M., Gerrard, M., & Simons, R. L. (2001). The influence of neighborhood disadvantage, collective socialization, and parenting on African American children’s affiliation with deviant peers. Child Development, 72, 1231–1246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development: Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, J. K., & Astor, R. A. (2011). School violence in Taiwan: Examining how western risk factors predict school violence in an Asian culture. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1388–1410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crosnoe, R., & Johnson, M. K. (2011). Research on adolescence in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescents’ friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrington, D. P., & Loeber, R. (2000). Some benefits of dichotomization in psychiatric and criminological research. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 10, 100–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Harris, J. R. (1998). The nurture assumption: Why children turn out the way they do. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hsieh, Y. S., Wu, C. I., & Lei, M. K. (2006). Friendship network characteristics, interaction context structure, and friendship dynamics among adolescents. Taiwanese Sociology, 11, 175–236.Google Scholar
  14. Hwang, S., & Akers, R. L. (2006). Parental and peer influences on adolescent drug use in Korea. Asian Journal of Criminology, 1, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim, K. J., Conger, R. D., Lorenz, F. O., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Parent-adolescent reciprocity in negative affect and its relation to early adult social development. Developmental Psychology, 37, 775–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim, J., Mapee, R. M., Oh, K. J., & Moon, H. S. (2008). Retrospective report of social withdrawal during adolescence and current maladjustment in young adulthood: Cross-cultural comparisons between Australian and South Korean students. Journal of Adolescence, 31, 543–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kirk, D. S. (2009). Unraveling the contextual effects on student suspension and juvenile arrest: The independent and interdependent influences of school, neighborhood, and family social control. Criminology, 47(2), 479–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, C., Beckert, T., & Goodrich, T. (2009). The relationship between individualistic, collectivistic, and transitional cultural value orientations and adolescent autonomy and identity status. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 882–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lei, M. K., & Wu, C. I. (2005). Bad parents, bad kids? The linkage of adolescent violent behaviors. Taiwanese Sociology, 7, 1–46.Google Scholar
  20. Leung, F. K. S. (1995). The mathematics classroom in Beijing, Hong Kong, and London. Education Studies in Mathematics, 29, 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leventhal, T., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2000). The neighborhoods they live in: The effects of neighborhood residence on child and adolescent outcomes. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Matsueda, R. L., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McNelles, L. R., & Connolly, J. A. (1999). Intimacy between adolescent friends: Age and gender differences in intimate affect and intimate behaviors. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 9, 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ngai, N. P., & Cheung, C. K. (2005). Predictors of the likelihood of delinquency: A study of marginal youth in Hong Kong, China. Youth & Society, 36, 445–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Patterson, G. R., Dishion, T. J., & Yoerger, K. (2000). Adolescent growth in new forms of problem behavior: Macro- and micro-peer dynamics. Prevention Science, 1, 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rankin, J. H., & Kern, R. (1994). Parental attachments and delinquency. Criminology, 32, 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Sampson, R. (2004). Bullying in schools (Problem-oriented guides for police problem-specific guides, Vol. 12). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
  29. Sampson, R. J., Stephen, W. R., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1969). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas: A study of rates of delinquency in relation to differential characteristics of local communities in American cities. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Simons, R. L., Lin, K. H., Gordon, L. C., Brody, G. H., Murry, V. M., & Conger, R. D. (2002). Community differences in the association between parenting practices and child delinquency. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 64, 331–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Soule, D., Gottfredson, D., & Bauer, E. (2008). It’s 3 p.m. do you know where your child is? A study on the timing of juvenile victimization and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 24, 623–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang, S., & Jensen, G. (2003). Explaining delinquency in Taiwan: A test of social learning theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime. Advances in criminological theory (Vol. 11, pp. 151–177). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Warr, M. (2005). Making delinquency friends: Adult supervision and children’s affiliations. Criminology, 43, 77–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Weaver, S. R., & Prelow, H. M. (2005). A mediated-moderation model of maternal parenting style, association with deviant peers, and problem behaviors in urban African American and European American adolescents. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 14(3), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Weerman, F. M. (2011). Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence affects. Criminology, 49, 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wen, C. P., Tsai, S. P., Cheng, T. Y., Hsu, C. C., Chen, T., & Lin, H. S. (2005). Role of parents and peers in influencing the smoking status of high school students in Taiwan. Tobacco Control, 14(Suppl 1), i10–i15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong, D., Lok, D., Lo, T. W., & Ma, S. (2008). School bullying among Hong Kong Chinese primary schoolchildren. Youth & Society, 40, 35–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wu, C. I., & Huang, Y. T. (2011). Long-term effect of friendship network on adolescent’s mental health: A dynamic view of resilience. Paper presented at International symposium on health, longevity, and society, Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  40. Wu, C. I., & Lei, M. K. (2001). The characteristics and changes of adolescent friendship networks: A longitudinal study. Paper presented at the First adolescent life course versus life adaptation conference, June 28–29, Nankang, Taipei.Google Scholar
  41. Wu, C. I., & Lei, M. K. (2004). Trajectories of adolescent depressive symptom across junior high and high school. Paper presented at International workshop on educational inequality and its consequence, Center for the Study of Social Stratification and Inequality, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.Google Scholar
  42. Wu, G. H., Chong, M. Y., Cheng, A. T., & Chen, T. H. (2007). Correlates of family, school, and peer variables with adolescent substance use in Taiwan. Social Science & Medicine, 64, 2594–2600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yi, C. C., & Wu, C. I. (2004). Teen life around the world: Introduction to teen life in Taiwan. In J. Slater (Ed.), Teen life around the world (pp. 223–241). Santa Barbara: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  44. Yi, C. C., Wu, C. I., Chang, Y. H., & Chang, M. Y. (2009). The psychological well-being of Taiwanese youth: School versus family context from early to late adolescence. International Sociology, 24(3), 397–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyAcademia SinicaTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of SociologyThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations