Advertisement

Subjective Well-Being of the Post-1980s Generation in Hong Kong: Implications for Social and Political Stability

  • Chung-Yan IpEmail author
  • Xiao-Gang Wu
Chapter
Part of the Quality of Life in Asia book series (QLAS, volume 2)

Abstract

The young post-1980s generation in Hong Kong has been a focus of attention in the mass media because of their radical behavior and the difficulties they face in their lives. Although results from analyses with population census data have revealed the worse-off socioeconomic situations encountered by the young post-1980s generation, a full understanding of their subjective well-being has yet to be obtained. Considering the fact that subjective well-being is part of the quality of life, in this chapter, we attempt to examine the life satisfaction of the post-1980s generation in Hong Kong. Based on the data from a territory-wide representative survey in 2007, we find that individuals from the post-1980s generation in Hong Kong are significantly less happy or have a lower level of subjective well-being, after controlling for other sociodemographic features, their evaluation of the local government, and their normative judgment of fairness and opportunity.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Income Inequality Birth Cohort Domain Satisfaction Political Trust 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the comments and suggestions from anonymous reviewers and the financial support from the Research Grants Council via a Strategic Public Policy Research Fund (HKUST6001-SPPR-08) and an internal Research Project Competition from HKUST (RPC10HSS04).

References

  1. Boarini, R., Johansson, A., & Mira d’Ercole, M. (2006). Alternative measures of well-being. Statistics Brief, 11, 1–8.Google Scholar
  2. Cheng, S. T. (2004). Age and subjective well-being revisited: A discrepancy perspective. Psychology and Aging, 19, 409–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheung, C. K., & Leung, K. K. (2008). Ways by which comparable income affects life satisfaction in Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 87, 169–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2000). Explaining differences in societal levels of happiness: Relative standards, need fulfillment, culture, and evaluation theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 41–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Diener, E., & Suh, M. E. (1997). Subjective well-being and age: An international analysis. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 17, 218–235.Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Lau, S. K. (2003). Confidence in Hong Kong’s capitalist society in the aftermath of the Asian financial turmoil. Journal of Contemporary China, 12, 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Liao, P. S., Fu, Y. C., & Yi, C. C. (2005). Perceived quality of life in Taiwan and Hong Kong: An intra-culture comparison. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6, 63–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lui, T. L. (2007). Xianggang si dai ren. Xianggang: Jin yi bu duo mei ti you xian gong si.Google Scholar
  11. Shek, D. T. L. (2004). Beliefs about causes of poverty and psychological well-being of parents and adolescents experiencing economic disadvantage in Hong Kong. American Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shek, D. T. L. (2011). Quality of life research: Responses to emerging issues in a changing world. Social Indicators Research, 100, 371–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shek, D. T. L., Chan, Y. K., & Lee, P. S. N. (2005). Quality of life in the global context: A Chinese response. Social Indicators Research, 71, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. South China Morning Post. (2009, December 20). A new generation of rebels who have found their cause.Google Scholar
  15. Wan, P. S., Law, K. W. K., & Wong, T. K. Y. (2008). Subjective well-being, 1997–2006. In S. W. Leung, P. S. Wan, & S. L. Wong (Eds.), Indicators of social development: Hong Kong 2006 (pp. 209–244). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  16. Wilkinson, W. (2007). In pursuit of happiness research: Is it reliable? What does it imply for policy? Policy Analysis, 590, 1–41.Google Scholar
  17. Wong, K. Y., & Wan, P. S. (2009). New evidence of the postmaterialist shift: The experience of Hong Kong. Social Indicators Research, 92, 497–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wong, C. K., Wong, K. Y., & Mok, B. H. (2006). Subjective well-being, societal condition and social policy – The case study of a rich Chinese society. Social Indicators Research, 78, 405–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wong, T. K. Y., Hsiao, H. H. M., & Wan, P. S. (2009). Comparing political trust in Hong Kong and Taiwan: Levels, determinants, and implications. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 10, 147–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu, X. (2008). Hong Kong social stratification and mobility survey: Technical report and users’ manual. Hong Kong: The Survey Research Center, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.Google Scholar
  21. Wu, X. (2009). Income inequality and distributive justice: A comparative analysis of Mainland China and Hong Kong. China Quarterly, 200, 1033–1052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Wu, X. (2010). Hong Kong’s post-80s generation: Profiles and predicaments. A report submitted to the Central Policy Unit, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  23. Yang, Y. (2008). Social inequalities in happiness in the United States, 1972 to 2004: An age-period-cohort analysis. American Sociological Review, 73, 204–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yip, P. S. F., Wong, P. W. C., Law, F. Y. W., & Fu, K. W. (2011). A study on understanding our young generation. A Report submitted to the Central Policy Unit, the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.Google Scholar
  25. Zheng, V., & Wong, S. L. (2008). Social trends: A comparison of subjective and objective indicators. In S. W. Leung, P. S. Wan, & S. L. Wong (Eds.), Indicators of social development: Hong Kong 2006 (pp. 245–283). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific Studies, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hong Kong Institute of Asia-Pacific StudiesThe Chinese University of Hong KongShatinHong Kong SAR
  2. 2.Center for Applied Social and Economic ResearchThe Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyKowloonHong Kong SAR

Personalised recommendations