Skip to main content

Generational Differences: Something Old, Something New

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Work and Quality of Life

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas arise when individuals have to make decisions in the context of competing values and beliefs. Some of these dilemmas will occur on the dimensions of what an individual believes to be fundamentally right or wrong, while others will be more nuanced depending on, for example, the relative strength and salience to the individual of the competing values and beliefs involved, the perceived costs to the individual of acting on or expressing their ethical concerns, and the degree of acceptance in the organization of conflict legitimacy and the expression of dissenting views. The workforce is getting older and, by all accounts, the work ethic and expectations across the generations are quite different. Such perceived differences provide a potentially fertile ground for ethical differences and conflicts arising from these.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academy of Management. (2005). Code of ethics. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from http://www.aomonline.org/aom.asp?ID=268&page_ID=240

  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

  • Boxall, P., Macky, K., & Rasmussen, E. (2003). Labour turnover and retention in New Zealand: The causes and consequences of leaving and staying with employers. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 41(2), 195–214. doi:1038-4111(200308)41:2;195-214;034915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891–906. doi:10.1108/02683940810904385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. (2000). Trust and the design of work: Complementary constructs in satisfaction and performance. Human Relations, 53(12), 1575–1591. doi:10.1177/00187267005312003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, A., & Herzfeldt, R. (2008). Learning orientation, organizational commitment and talent retention across generations: A study of European managers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 929–953. doi:10.1108/02683940810904402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Hauw, S., & De Vos, A. (2010). Millennials’ career perspective and psychological contract expectations: Does the recession lead to lowered expectations? Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 293–302. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9162-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de los Reyes, P. (2000). Diversity at work: Paradoxes, possibilities and problems in the Swedish discourse on diversity. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 21(6), 253–266. doi:10.1177/0143831X00212007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deal, J. (2007). The myth of generational differences in the workplace. In: J. Deal (Ed.), Review of the book Retiring the generation gap. How employees young and old can find common ground. San Francisco: Wiley. Retrieved February 9, 2011, from www.amanet.org/training/articles

  • Deal, J., Altman, D., & Rogelberg, S. (2010). Millennials at work: What we know and what we need to do (if anything). Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 191–199. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9177-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dollard, M., & Karasek, R. (2010). Building psychosocial safety climate: Evaluation of a socially coordinated PAR risk management stress prevention study. In J. Houdmont & S. Leka (Eds.), Contemporary occupational health psychology: Global perspectives on research and practice (pp. 208–233). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dries, N., Pepermans, R., & De Kerpel, E. (2008). Exploring four generations’ beliefs about career: Is “satisfied” the new “successful”? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 907–928. doi:10.1108/02683940810904394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. L. (Eds.). (2011). Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). Perceived organisational support and employee diligence, commitment and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glass, A. (2007). Understanding generational differences for competitive success. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(2), 98–103. doi:10.1108/00197850710732424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopinath, C., & Becker, T. E. (2000). Communication, procedural justice, and employee attitudes: Relationships under conditions of divestiture. Journal of Management, 26(1), 63–83. doi:10.1177/014920630002600107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershatter, A., & Epstein, M. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An organization and management perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 211–223. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9160-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurkiewicz, C. E. (2000). Generation X and the public employee. Public Personnel Management, 29(1), 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, E. L., & Harter, L. M. (2001). Discourses of diversity and the quality of work life: The character and costs of the managerial metaphor. Management Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 121–127. doi:10.1177/0893318901151008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowske, B., Rasch, R., & Wiley, J. (2010). Millennials’ (lack of) attitude problem: An empirical examination of generational effects on work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 265–279. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9171-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. M. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging perspectives, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multi-generation employees: Strategies for effective management. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, N., & Piercy, N. F. (2003). The ethics of discrimination: Organizational mindsets and female employment disadvantage. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(6), 313–325. doi:10.1023/A:1023644602447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levenson, A. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: An economist’s perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 257–264. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9170-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2007). The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: An investigation of additive and interaction effects. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(4), 537–567. doi:10.1080/09585190601178745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macky, K., & Boxall, P. (2008). Employee experiences of high-performance work systems: An analysis of sectoral, occupational, organisational and employee variables. New Zealand Journal of Employment Relations, 33(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, K., & Sadaghiani, K. (2010). Millennials in the workplace: A communication perspective on millennials’ organizational relationships and performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 225–238. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9172-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E., Schweitzer, L., & Lyons, S. (2010). New generation, great expectations: A field study of the millennial generation. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 281–292. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9159-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, S. M., & Schewe, C. D. (2003). Cohort segmentation: An exploration of its validity. Journal of Business Research, 56(12), 979–987. doi:10.1016S0148-2963(02), 00268-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Guinn, T., & Shrum, L. (1997). The role of television in the construction of social reality. Journal of Consumer Research, 23(4), 278–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real, K., Mitnick, A., & Maloney, W. (2010). More similar than different: Millennials in the U.S. building trades. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 303–313. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9163-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, G. (2000). Employee involvement: Opening the diversity Pandora’s Box? Personnel Review, 29(3), 304–323. doi:10.1108/00483480010324661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., & Gardner, D. H. (2007). Factors affecting employee use of work-life balance initiatives. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36(1), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smola, K. W., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 363–382. doi:10.1002/job.147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staff, J., & Schulenberg, J. (2010). Millennials and the world of work: Experiences in paid work during adolescence. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 247–255. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9167-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (1991). Generations: The history of America’s future, 1584 to 2069. New York: William Morrow & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesser, A., & Shaffer, D. R. (1990). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 479–523. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2009). Reevaluating the evidence for increasingly positive self-views among high school students: More evidence for consistency across generations (1976–2006). Psychological Science, 20(7), 920–922. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02361.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Rethinking “Generation Me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2006. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 58–75. doi:10.1177/1745691609356789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trzesniewski, K. H., Donnellan, M. B., & Robins, R. W. (2008). Is “Generation Me” really more narcissistic than previous generations? Journal of Personality, 76(4), 903–918. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00508.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. W. (2000). The age of anxiety? Birth cohort change in anxiety and neuroticism, 1952–1993. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1007–1021. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.79.6.1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. W. (2010). A review of the empirical evidence on generational differences in work attitudes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(2), 201–210. doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9165-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. W., & Campbell, S. M. (2008). Generational differences in psychological traits and their impact on the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 862–877. doi:10.1108/02683940810904367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. W., & Campbell, W. K. (2010). Birth cohort differences in the monitoring the future dataset and elsewhere: Further evidence for Generation Me – Commentary on Trzesniewski and Donnellan (2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 81–88. doi:10.1177/1745691609357015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weekend Herald. (2007). Don’t hire Gen Y says researcher, Weekend Herald, pp C8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitener, E. M. (2001). Do “high commitment” human resources practices affect employee commitment? A cross-level analysis using hierarchical linear modeling. Journal of Management, 27(5), 515–535. doi:10.1177/014920630102700502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, M., Gardiner, E., Lang, W., & Coulon, L. (2008). Generational differences in personality and motivation: Do they exist and what are the implications for the workplace? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 878–890. doi:10.1108/02683940810904376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolley, H. T. (1910). A review of the recent literature on the psychology of sex. Psychological Bulletin, 7(10), 335–342. doi:10.1037/h0066338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dianne Gardner Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gardner, D., Macky, K. (2012). Generational Differences: Something Old, Something New. In: Reilly, N., Sirgy, M., Gorman, C. (eds) Work and Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4059-4_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics