Skip to main content

Hostile Work Environment: “Is It Just Me or Is It Chilly in Here?”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 5207 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life ((IHQL))

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with employer-employee relationships in a hostile work environment. We propose a conceptual model to explore the antecedents and outcomes of hostile work environments, considering possible interactions between personality traits and situational conditions and incorporating contextual factors as moderators. Drawing on stakeholder theory, we recommend measures which can help minimize the negative impacts of hostile work environments on individuals and organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, S. J. (1963). Towards an understanding of inequality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, S. A. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 947–965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. M., & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Lamertz, K. (2004). A relational model of workplace victimization: Social roles and patterns of victimization in dyadic relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 1023–1034.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14(2), 126–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandow, D., & Hunter, D. (2007). The rise of workplace incivilities: Has it happened to you? The Business Review, 7, 212–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beenen, G., & Pinto, J. (2009). Resisting organizational-level Corruption: An interview with Sherron Watkins. The Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8, 275–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettman, J. R., & Weitz, B. A. (1983). Attributions in the board room: Causal reasoning in corporate annual report. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Tripp, T. M. (2005). The study of revenge in the workplace: Conceptual, ideological and empirical issues. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 65–81). Washington, DC: APA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, M. M., & Stout, L. A. (2001). Director accountability and the mediating role of the corporate board. Washington University Law Quarterly, 79, 403–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. (1998). A Kantian theory of capitalism. Business Ethics Quarterly, Special Issue, 1, 37–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N. A., & Beehr, T. A. (2006). Workplace harassment from the victim’s perspective: A theoretical model and meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 998–1012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky, C. M. (1976). The harassed work. Toronto, Canada: Lexington Books/DC Health and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Trevino, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., & Su, S. F. (2005). Goal interdependence for working across cultural boundaries: Chinese employees with foreign managers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 429–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S. F., & Peng, J. C. (2008). The relationship between psychological contract breach and employee deviance: The moderating role of hostile attributional style. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 73, 426–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B. (1996). Social influence and the triple tumor structure of organizational dishonesty. In D. M. Messick & A. E. Tenbrunsel (Eds.), Codes of conduct: Behavioral research into business ethics (pp. 44–58). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, A. E., Mount, M. K., Harter, J. K., Witt, L. A., & Barrick, M. R. (2004). Interactive effects of personality and perceptions of the work situation on workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 599–609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. (2002). Explaining injustice: The interactive effects of explanation and outcome on fairness perceptions and task motivation. Journal of Management, 28, 591–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., & Jackson, C. L. (2006). Justice in teams: The context-sensitivity of justice rules across individual and team contexts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36, 870–901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2009). Patterns and profiles of responses to incivility in the workplace. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14, 272–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. (2004). Managing variable pay systems in smaller workplaces: The significance of employee perceptions of organizational justice. In J. Storey, M. Ram, & S. Marlow (Eds.), Employment relations in SMEs (pp. 179–199). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle-Shapiro, J. (2002). A psychological contract perspective on organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 927–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. Academy of Management Perspective, 21, 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., Goldman, B.M., & Folger, R. (2005). Self-interest: Defining and understanding a human motive. Joural of Organisation Behavior, 26, 985–991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano, R., & Mitchell, M. S. (2005). Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, W., & Gardner, W. (2004). Perceptions of politics and organizational cynicism: An attributional and leader-member exchange perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 439–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, S., & Konzelmann, S. (2004). Learning from Enron. Corporate Governance, 12, 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1024–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deery, S. J., Iverson, R. D., & Walsh, J. T. (2006). Toward a better understanding of psychological contract breach: A study of customer service employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 166–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., Trevino, L. K., Burris, E. R., & Andiappan, M. (2007). Managerial modes of influence and counter productivity in organizations: A longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 993–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddleston, K. A., Kidder, D. L., & Litzky, B. E. (2002). Who’s the boss? Contending with competing expectations from customers and management. The Academy of Management Executive, 16, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. D., & Kleiner, B. H. (1998). Transforming organizational values and culture effectively. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 9, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., Armeli, S., Rexwinkel, B., Lynch, P. D., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Reciprocation of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 42–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evan, W. M., & Freeman, R. E. (2004). A stakeholder theory of the modern corporation: Kantian capitalism. In T. L. Beauchamp & N. E. Bowie (Eds.), Ethical theory and business. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision of leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 359–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortin, M., & Fellenz, M. (2008). Hypocrisies of fairness: Towards a more reflexive ethical base in organizational justice research and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 415–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S., Spector, P. E., & Miles, D. (2001). Counterproductive work behavior (CWB) in response to job stressors and organizational justice: Some mediator and moderator tests for autonomy and emotions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 291–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallucci, M., & Perugini, M. (2003). Information seeking and reciprocity: A transformational analysis. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 473–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonthier, G. (2002). Rude awakenings: Overcoming the civility crisis in the workplace. Chicago: Dearborn Trade Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henle, C. A. (2005). Predicting workplace deviance from the interaction between organizational justice and personality. Journal of Managerial Issues, 17, 247–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ho, V. T., Weingart, L., & Rousseau, D. M. (2004). Responses to broken promises: Does personality matter? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65, 276–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogh, A., & Dofradottir, A. (2001). Coping with bullying in the workplace. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10, 485–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoobler, J. M., & Swanberg, J. (2006). The enemy is not us: Unexpected workplace violence trends. Public Personnel Management, 35, 229–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, M. S. (2005). Think before you type: A look at email privacy in the workplace. Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, 11, 115–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inness, M., Barling, J., & Turner, N. (2005). Understanding supervisor-targeted aggression: A within-person, between-jobs design. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 731–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. R., & Indvik, J. (2001). Rudeness at work: Impulse over restraint. Public Personnel Management, 30, 457–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L. (1998). Emotional abuse in the workplace: Conceptual and empirical issues. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 1, 85–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keashly, L., & Harvey, S. (2005). Emotional abuse in the workplace. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (Eds.), Counterproductive work behavior: Investigations of actors and targets (pp. 201–236). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, N. L., & Tindale, R. S. (2004). Small group decision making and performance. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 623–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickul, J., & Mattew, L. T. (2003). Making sense of the meaning behind the message: Climate perceptions and the psychological contract. Mid-American Journal of Business, 18, 23–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (1999). Trust and distrust in organizations: Emerging questions, enduring questions. Annual Review of Psychology, 50, 569–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kray, L., & Allan-Lind, E. (2002). The injustices of others: Social reports and the integration of others’ experiences in organizational justice judgments. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 906–924.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krings, F., & Facchin, S. (2009). Organizational justice and men’s likelihood to sexually harass: The moderating role of sexism and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, A. W. (1970). Attributing trustworthiness in supervisor-worker relations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 214–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuliks, B. W. (2005). Agency theory, reasoning, and culture in Enron: In search of a solution. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 347–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, T. B., & Robinson, S. L. (2007). Ain’t misbehaving: Workplace deviance as organizational resistance. Journal of Management, 33, 378–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1999). Stress and emotion: A new synthesis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. (2008). Matching ethical work climate to in-role and extra-role behaviors in a collectivist work setting. Journal of Business Ethics, 79, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Personal and workgroup incivility: Impact on work and health outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, R. M., Irvine, V. B., & Lindsay, L. M. (1996). Instilling ethical behavior in organizations: A survey of Canadian companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 393–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, Q. (2003). Wheel, deal, and steal: Deceptive accounting, deceitful CEOs, and ineffective reforms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times/Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1159–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W., & Robinson, S. L. (1997). When employees feel betrayed: A model of how psychological contract violation develops. Academy of Management Review, 22, 226–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulki, J. P., Jaramillo, F., & Locander, W. B. (2006). Emotional exhaustion and organizational deviance: Can the right job and a leader’s style make a difference? Journal of Business Research, 59, 1222–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Namie, G. (2003, November/December). Workplace bullying: Escalated incivility. Ivey Business Journal, 13, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., Roberts, J. A., & Chonko, L. B. (2009). The virtuous influence of ethical leadership behavior: Evidence from the field. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 157–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, M., & Shields, J. (2002). Performance management and the psychological contract in the Australian federal public sector. Journal of Industrial Relations, 44, 435–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olkkonen, M., & Lipponen, J. (2006). Relationships between organizational justice, identification with the organization and the work-unit, and group-related outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 202–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, J. L. (2003). Executive voice: Former Enron vice president Sherron Watkins on the Enron collapse. The Academy of Management Executive, 17, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. (1999, March). Rude managers make for bad business. Workforce, 78, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M., Andersson, L. M., & Porath, C. L. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 123–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M., & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counterproductive work behavior (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 777–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. K. (2002). Deviant workplace behavior and the organization’s ethical climate. Journal of Business and Psychology, 17, 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raabe, B., & Beehr, T. (2003). Formal mentoring versus supervisor and coworker relationships: Differences in perceptions and impact. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 271–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A., Magner, N. R., Antonioni, D., & Rahman, S. (2001). Do justice relationships with organization-directed reactions differ across U.S. and Bangladesh employees? International Journal of Conflict Management, 12, 333–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restubog, S. L. D., Bordia, P., & Bordia, S. (2009). The interactive effects of procedural justice and equity sensitivity in predicting responses to psychological contract breach: An interactionist perspective. Journal of Business and Psychology, 24, 165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Justice in teams: The activation and role of sense making in the emergence of justice climates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 100, 177–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberson, Q. M., Moye, N. A., & Locke, E. A. (1999). Identifying a missing link between participation and satisfaction: The mediating role of procedural justice perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 585–593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L. (1996). Trust and breach of the psychological contract. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 574–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 555–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. L., Kraatz, M. S., & Rousseau, D. M. (1994). Changing the obligations and psychological contract. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 437–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen, C. C., Chang, C.-H., Johnson, R. E., & Levy, P. E. (2009). Perceptions of the organizational context and psychological contract breach: Assessing competing perspective. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 202–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee Rights and Responsibilities Journal, 2, 121–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salin, D. (2003). Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations, 56, 1213–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sethia, N. K., & Von Glinow, M. A. (1985). Arriving four cultures by managing the reward system. In R. Kilmann, M. Saxton, & R. Serpa (Eds.), Gaining control of the corporate culture (pp. 400–420). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R., & Brinkmann, J. (2003). Enron ethics (Or: Culture matters more than codes). Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 243–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Gee, J. (2004). When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 322–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, B. (2003). The unindicted co-conspirator. Organizational Dynamics, 32, 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standage, M., Duda, J. L., & Pensgaard, A. M. (2005). The effect of competitive outcome and task-involving, ego-involving and cooperative structures on the psychological well-being of individuals engaged in a co-ordination task: A self-determination approach. Behavioral Science, 29, 41–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tam, P. W., White, E., Wingfield, N., & Maher, K. (2005). Snooping email by software is now a workplace norm. Wall Street Journal, March, 9, B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tekleab, A. G., Takeauchi, R., & Taylor, M. S. (2005). Extending the chain of relationships among organizational justice, social exchange, and employee reactions: The role of contract violations. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 146–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 684–707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., Duffy, M., & Shaw, J. (2001). Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 974–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J., Henle, C. A., Lambert, L. S., Giacalone, R. A., & Duffy, M. K. (2008). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 721–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. A., & Bunderson, J. S. (2003). Violations of principle: Ideological currency in the psychological contract. Academy of Management Review, 28, 571–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D., Hui, C., Ding, D., & Hu, J. (2003). Conflict values and team relationships: Conflict’s contribution to team effectiveness in China. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Todd, M. W. (2002). Reading your every keystroke: Protecting employee email privacy. Journal of High Technology Law, 1, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R. (2001). A psychological perspective on the legitimacy of institutions and authorities. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy (pp. 416–436). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2005). Can businesses effectively regulate employee conduct? The antecedents of rule following in work settings. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1143–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Cremer, D. D. (2005). Process-based leadership: Fair procedures and reactions to organizational change. The Leadership Quarterly, 16, 529–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., & Maslyn, J. M. (2003). Reciprocity in manager-subordinate relationships: Components, configurations, and outcomes. Journal of Management, 29, 511–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vegt, G. S., Van de Vliert, E., & Osterhof, A. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 715–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, D. (2003). Constructive and destructive deviance in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 28, 622–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, S. S. (2003). Ethical conflicts at Enron: Moral responsibility in corporate capitalism. California Management Review, 45, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1984). Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 465–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegge, J., & Kleinbeck, U. (1996). Goal setting and group performance: Impact of achievement and affiliation motives, participation in goal-setting. In T. Gjesme & R. Nygard (Eds.), Advances in motivation (pp. 1–34). Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, B. (1986). An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J. W. (2009). Business ethics: A stakeholder and issues management approach (5th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, T. A., & Goodstein, J. (2007). Character is not “dead” in management research: A review of individual character and organizational-level virtue. Journal of Management, 33, 928–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zdaniuk, B., & Levine, J. M. (2001). Group loyalty: Impact of members’ identification and contribution. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 502–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1068–1076.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, H., Wayne, S. J., Glibkowski, B. C., & Bravo, J. (2007). The impact of psychological contract breach on work-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 60, 647–680.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia S. M. Leung Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Leung, A.S.M., Snape, E. (2012). Hostile Work Environment: “Is It Just Me or Is It Chilly in Here?”. In: Reilly, N., Sirgy, M., Gorman, C. (eds) Work and Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4059-4_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics