Abstract
This analysis of gender differences in preparedness to meet retirement’s challenges uses data derived primarily from Statistics Canada’s 2007 General Social Survey (GSS). We also present results of our analysis of data from the 2008 Health and Retirement Survey of the University of Michigan. We construct two composite indicators, with the help of a team of experts. At the highest of five levels of the indicator for Canada, the percentage for men is significantly greater than that for women. We use multivariate analysis to examine whether this differential is due to variance in population composition between pre-retired men and women. After holding constant several relevant factors, we found that the concentration of pre-retired men in the highest level of the indicator was 10% greater than that for their female counterparts. Pronounced gender differences exist within important population segments. Women tend to have markedly greater concentrations than men in the lowest quintile of the indicator among widows and widowers. Among both the university educated and those without a high school diploma, men have much larger percentages in the top levels of the indicator. A sharp difference favoring men also exists among married immigrants.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Keep in mind that the boundaries that separate quintiles were established by making computations for the population that comprises both men and women.
- 2.
The reader will wonder why variables such as income and capital accumulation are not listed here as prime examples. They are not listed because they comprise dimensions of the preparedness indicator.
- 3.
A simple cross tabulation using the observed indicator scores would not produce publishable data due to sample size issues.
References
Chicago Bar Association, & Women’s Bar Association of Illinois. (2007). Women at risk: Timing, financing, and coping with retirement. Report of the joint task force on issues affecting women as they age. Chicago. September 27, 2007. http://actuarialfoundation.org/consumer/women-at-risk.html. Accessed 17 July 2011.
ERISA Advisory Council. (2010). Disparities for women and minorities in retirement savings. http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/publications/2010ACreport3.html. Accessed 17 July 2011.
International Federation for Retirement Education. (2011). InFRE Retirement Readiness Profile. http://www.infre.org/RetirementReadinessProfile.html. Accessed 17 July 2011.
Johnson, R. W. (2011). Women’s retirement risks. Urban Institute, April 29, 2011. http://www.urban.org/url.cfm?ID=500224&renderforprint=1. Accessed 17 July 2011.
Larou, J. B. (2009). Challenges women face in retirement security. New York: Nova.
McDonald, L. (2006). Gendered retirement: The welfare of women and the ‘new’ retirement. In L. O. Stone (Ed.), New frontiers of research on retirement (pp. 137–164). Ottawa: Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/75–511-XIE/0010675–511-XIE.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2011.
Papke, L.E., Walker, L., & Dworsky, M. (2008). Retirement security for women: Progress to date and policies for tomorrow. The retirement security project. http://www.pewtrusts.org/our_work_report_detail.aspx?id=38190. Accessed 17 July 2011.
Rappaport, A. M. (2006). Easing the strain on boomer women in retirement: Why efforts must begin now. In P. Hodge (Ed.), Baby boomer women: Secure futures or not? (pp. 9–17). Cambridge: Global Generations Policy Initiative. http://www.genpolicy.com/2006_journal/p_files/boomer_women_retirement.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2011.
Society of Actuaries. (2010). The impact of retirement risk on women: 2009 Risks and Process of Retirement Survey report. http://www.soa.org/files/pdf/research-key-finding-impact-retire-women.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2011.
The Women’s Institute for a Secure Retirement. (2009). How can women’s income last as long as they do? http://www.wiserwomen.org/pdf_files/wiserRoundtableRptFinalRev.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2011.
Townson, M. (2006). The impact of precarious employment on financial security in retirement. In L. O. Stone (Ed.), New frontiers of research on retirement (pp. 355–379). Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 75–511-XPE. Ottawa: Statistics Canada. http://www.statcan.ca/english/freepub/75–511-XIE/0010675–511-XIE.pdf. Accessed 17 July 2011.
Zimmerman, L. (2009). Bag lady or powerhouse: A roadmap for midlife women. Calgary: Detslig Enterprises.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stone, L.O., Neumann, B. (2012). Gender Differences in Preparedness to Meet Retirement’s Challenges. In: Stone, L. (eds) Key Demographics in Retirement Risk Management. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4044-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4044-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4043-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4044-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)