Abstract
This essay is intended to leave in its wake a coherent perspective on the study of rhetorical argument. The rhetorical influences on argumentation studies through the years are generally acknowledged, but just what rhetorical study is, where it originated, how it has evolved, and whether it is a coherent mode of study is problematic. So, this essay attempts to respond to these circumstances. The essay begins with an historical account of the relationship between rhetoric and argumentation. The roots of rhetorical argument are in classical rhetoric. But rhetoric itself has had an uneven history of importance in Western thought, important to the classical age, central to the medieval university, then diminished in importance until the late twentieth century. In that ebb and flow, rhetoric and argument were not always considered partners. The essay focuses on an account the recovery of rhetorical argument in the twentieth century. That recovery flourished within the context of two of the greatest intellectual movements in the twentieth century: the growth of analytic inquiry and the linguistic turn. Then, the essay turns to a brief survey of the rich variety of research in rhetorical argument at the dawn of the twenty-first century. The breadth of research that grows from the rhetorical argument tradition is so diffuse that the coherence is often lost. The essay attempts to weave the fabric in this variety. Finally, grounded in the historical roots and current practice of rhetorical argument, the essay distills the central characteristics that define the study of rhetorical argument.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aly, B. (1965). Enthymemes: The story of a lighthearted search. Speech Teacher, 14(4), 265–275.
Aristotle. (322 b.c.e.). (1909). Rhetorica (R. C. Jebb, Trans.). Cambridge: University Press.
Asen, R. (2004). A discourse theory of citizenship. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 90(2), 189–211.
Bitzer, L. (1959). Aristotle’s enthymeme revisited. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45(4), 399–408.
Bitzer, L., & Black, E. (Eds.). (1971). The prospect of rhetoric. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Brigance, W. H. (Ed.). (1943). History and criticism of American public address (Vols. 1–2). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Bryant, D. (1953). Rhetoric: Its functions and its scope. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 39(4), 401–424.
Campbell, J. A. (1970). Darwin and the origin of species: The rhetorical ancestry of an idea. Speech Monographs, 37(1), 1–14.
Carr, M. K. (2010). Rhetorical contingency and affirmative action: The paths to diversity in regents of the University of California v. Bakke. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Cronkhite, G. (1966). The enthymeme as deductive rhetorical argument. Western Speech, 30(2), 129–134.
Fisher, W. (1964). Uses of the enthymeme. The Speech Teacher, 13(3), 197–203.
Fisher, W. R. (1987a). Human communication as narration: Toward a philosophy of reason, value, and action. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Fisher, W. R. (1987b). Technical Logic, rhetorical logic, and narrative rationality. Argumentation, 1, 3–22.
Foucault, M. (1973). The birth of the clinic: An archaeology of medical perception (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). New York: Random House. (Original French edition, 1963.)
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books. (Original French edition, 1975.)
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (R. Hurley, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books. (Original French edition, 1976.)
Goodnight, G. T. (1982). The personal, technical, and public spheres of argument: A speculative inquiry into the art of public deliberation. Journal of the American Forensic Association, 18(3), 214–227.
Greene, R. (2002). Citizenship in a global context: Towards a future beginning for a cultural studies inspired argumentation theory. In G. T. Goodnight (Ed.), Arguing communication and culture (Vol. 1, pp. 97–103). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Greene, R. (2003). John Dewey’s eloquent citizen: Communication, judgment, and postmodern capitalism. Argumentation and Advocacy, 39(3), 189.
Habermas, J. (1975). Legitimation crisis (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original German edition, 1973.)
Habermas, J. (1984, 1987). A theory of communicative action (Vols. 1–2) (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original German editions, 1981.)
Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Original German edition, 1962.)
Hauser, G. A. (1999). Vernacular voices: The rhetoric of publics and public spheres. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Hitchcock, D. (Ed.). (2005). The uses of argument: Proceedings of a conference at McMaster University (n.p.). Hamilton: Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation.
Hitchcock, D., & Verheij, B. (Eds.). (2006). Arguing on the Toulmin model: New essays in argument analysis and evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.
Hochmuth, M. K. (Ed.). (1955). History and criticism of American public address (Vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Ivie, R. L. (2007). Dissent from war. Bloomfield: Kumarian Press.
Klumpp, J. F. (2006). Facts, truth and Iraq: A call to stewardship of democratic argument. In P. Riley (Ed.), Engaging argument (pp. 1–17). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
Klumpp, J. F. (2009). Argumentative ecology. Argumentation and Advocacy, 45(4), 183–197.
Kock, C. (2009). Choice is not true or false: The domain of rhetorical argumentation. Argumentation, 23(1), 61–80.
McBurney, J. (1936). The place of the enthymeme in rhetorical theory. Speech Monographs, 3(1), 49–74.
McKerrow, R. E. (Ed.). (1993). Argument and the postmodern challenge. Annandale: Speech Communication Association.
Mudd, C. (1959). The enthymeme and logical validity. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 45(4), 409–414.
Parson, D. W. (1993). Kenneth Burke and argument? An introduction. Argumentation and Advocacy, 29(4), 145–147.
Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958). Traité de l’argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Perelman, C., & Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation (J. Wilkinson, & P. Weaver, Trans.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published, 1958.)
Scott, R. L. (1967). On viewing rhetoric as epistemic. Central States Speech Journal, 18(1), 9–17.
Tannen, D. (1998). The argument culture: Stopping America’s war of words. New York: Random House.
Tindale, C. W. (1999). Acts of arguing: A rhetorical model of argument. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Toulmin, S. E. (1950). An examination of the place of reason in ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, S. E. (1972). Human understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Utterback, W. (1925). Aristotle’s contribution to the psychology of argument. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 11(3), 218–225.
Van Eemeren, F., & Houtlosser, P. (2000). Rhetorical analysis within a pragma-dialectical framework. Argumentation, 14(3), 293–305.
Wallace, K. (1963). The substance of rhetoric: Good reasons. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 49(3), 239–249.
Walwik, T. (1960). Enthymeme revisited. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 46(1), 84–85.
Wichelns, H. (1925). The literary criticism of oratory. In D. C. Bryant (Ed.), The rhetorical idiom: Essays in rhetoric, oratory, language, and drama (pp. 5–42). Rpt. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1958.
Wiley, E. (1956). The enthymeme: Idiom of persuasion. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 42(1), 19–24.
Wrage, E. (1947). Public address: A study in social and intellectual history. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 33(4), 451–457.
Wynn, J. (2009). Arithmetic of the species: Darwin and the role of mathematics in his argumentation. Rhetorica, 27(1), 76–97.
Yost, M. (1917). Argument from the point-of-view of sociology. The Quarterly Journal of Public Speaking, 3(2), 109–124.
Zarefsky, D. (1995). Argumentation in the tradition of speech communication studies. In F. H. van Eemeren, R. Grootendorst, J. A. Blair, & C. A. Willard (Eds.), Perspectives and approaches (pp. 32–49). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Netherlands
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klumpp, J.F. (2012). Rhetorical Argument. In: van Eemeren, F., Garssen, B. (eds) Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory. Argumentation Library, vol 22. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4041-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4040-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4041-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)