Skip to main content

Integrating Digital Technologies into the Contemporary Science Classroom

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research
  • 1954 Accesses

Abstract

Digital educational technologies and ICT have been widely reported as central to innovations in science education. The Australian Government’s School Science Education action plan has recommended as a priority that pedagogy should enable students to learn science by ‘seeking understanding from multiple sources of information, ranging from hands-on investigation to internet searching’ (Goodrum and Rennie, Australian school science education: National Action Plan 2008–2012: Vol. 1. The National Action Plan. Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra, p 14, 2007). Interactive whiteboard (IWB) technology has been embraced in Australia and internationally as an educational tool that enables the convergence of a diverse range of ICT sources and multimodal representations into daily classroom practice. The technology enables students and teachers to interact with all the functions of a desktop computer through the IWB’s large touch-sensitive surface, fixed at the front of the classroom (Murcia, Teach Sci 54(4):17–21, 2008; Betcher and Lee, The interactive whiteboard revolution. ACER Press, Camberwell, 2009). However, to enhance the effectiveness of classroom science, educators must move beyond understanding the technology itself, important as this is, to understanding the impact of the technology on teachers’ pedagogy and students learning (Higgins et al., Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213–225, 2007). A series of case studies conducted in Australian science classrooms, which explored the impact of IWB technology on learning and teaching, are discussed in this chapter. Classroom-based examples of effective interactive digital pedagogy are reported here with the aim of supporting educators moving to or working in contemporary IWB learning environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers in Education, 33, 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Academy of Science. (2007). Primary connections. http://www.science.org.au/primaryconnections/spinninginspace.htm. Accessed 5 Oct 2009.

  • Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2008). The influence of ICT on the interactivity of teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 13, 305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betcher, C., & Lee, M. (2009). The interactive whiteboard revolution. Camberwell: ACER Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaney, R., Chapman, A., & Hennessy, S. (2009). A case-study of one teacher’s use of an interactive whiteboard system to support knowledge co-construction in the history classroom. Curriculum Journal, 20(4), 365–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian school science education: National Action Plan 2008–2012: Vol. 1. The National Action Plan. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackling, M., & Prain, V. (2005). Primary connections: Stage 2 trial – Research report. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science. http://www.science.org.au/primaryconnections/pcreport1.htm

  • Hackling, M., Smith, P., & Murcia, K. (2010). Talking science: Developing a discourse of inquiry. Teaching Science, 56(1), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, B., Gunel, M., & Ulu, C. (2009). Sequencing embedded multimodal representations in a writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(3), 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, S., Beachamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive whiteboards. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 213–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy, learning. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M. (2010). Interactive whiteboards and schooling: The context. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 133–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1998). Teaching all the languages of science: Words, symbols, images, and actions. http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/education/jlemke/papers/barcelon.htm. Accessed 20 Aug 2009.

  • Littleton, K. (2010). Research into teaching with whole-class interactive technologies: Emergent themes. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 285–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N., Hennessy, S., & Warwick, P. (2010). Using interactive whiteboards to orchestrate classroom dialogue. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 195–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murcia, K. (2005). Using action research principles for professional development: The Waikiki school experience. ALAR Journal, 10(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia, K. (2008). Teaching for scientific literacy with an interactive whiteboard. Teaching Science, 54(4), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia, K. (2010). Multi-modal representations in primary science: What’s offered by interactive whiteboard technology? Teaching Science, 56(1), 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murcia, K., & McKenzie, S. (2008). Whiteboard Technology: Engaging children with literacy and numeracy rich contexts. Report to DEEWR Australia. http://www.education.murdoch.edu.au/clcd/docs/Whiteboard%20Technology%20Report.pdf

  • Murcia, K., & Sheffield, R. (2010). Talking about science in interactive whiteboard classrooms. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(4), 417–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prain, V., & Waldrip, B. (2006). An exploratory study of teachers’ and students’ use of multi-modal representations of concepts in primary science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(15), 1843–1866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, T. (2007). Interactive whiteboards in the classroom. Futurelab. www.futurelab.org.uk/events/listing/whiteboards/report. Accessed 20 Mar 2009.

  • Tanner, H., Jones, S., Kennewell, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2005, July). Interactive whiteboards and pedagogies of whole class teaching. In P. Clarkson, A. Downton, D. Gronn, M. Horne, A. McDonough & R. Pierce, et al. (Eds.), Building connections: Theory, research and practice. Proceedings of the 28th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Melbourne. Sydney: MERGA. http://www.merga.net.au/documents/RP832005.pdf. Accessed 11 Jan 2011.

  • Twiner, A., Coffin, C., Littleton, K., & Whitelock, D. (2010). Multimodality, orchestration and participation in the context of classroom use of the interactive whiteboard: A discussion. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 19(2), 211–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R. (2007). Australian Education Review. Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytler, R., Peterson, S., & Prain, V. (2006). Picturing evaporation: Learning science literacy through a particle representation. Teaching Science, 52(1), 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, P., & Kershner, R. (2006). Is there a picture of beyond? Mind mapping, ICT and collaborative learning in primary science. In P. Warwick, E. Wilson, & M. Winterbottom (Eds.), Teaching and learning primary science with ICT. Cambridge: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, P., Wilson, E., & Winterbottom, M. (2006). Considering the place of ICT in developing good practice in primary science. In P. Warwick, E. Wilson, & M. Winterbottom (Eds.), Teaching and learning primary science with ICT. Cambridge: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, K. (1995). Action learning. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Murcia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Murcia, K. (2012). Integrating Digital Technologies into the Contemporary Science Classroom. In: Tan, K., Kim, M. (eds) Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics