Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Simulations in Science: An Exploration of Pupil Behaviour

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research

Abstract

It has long been argued that information communication technologies (ICT) have a role to play in school science classrooms. The edited collections by Barton (Teaching secondary science with ICT. Open University Press, Cambridge, 2004) and Rodrigues (Multiple literacy and science education: ICTS in formal and informal learning environments, IGI Global, Hershey, 2010) provide an informative overview of the field, illustrating options, opportunities and challenges. In this chapter, I focus on one option, the use of multimedia-based simulations, and I describe the opportunities and challenges that can be seen when these simulations are used to support chemistry education. I based the chapter on data collected over the last ten years and will use findings from a variety of projects involving simulations in chemistry classrooms to illustrate opportunities and challenges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Azevedo, R. (2004). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, P. (2008). Re-evaluating a model of learning design. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(2), 127–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. (2002). Teaching secondary science with ICT. Cambridge: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. (2004). Teaching secondary science with ICT. Cambridge: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabris, C., & Simons, D. (2010). The Invisible Gorilla: And other ways our intuitions deceive us. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition & Instruction, 8(4), 293–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62(2), 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R., & Mayer, R. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction. Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning, California: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in schools 1980–2000. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Hennessy, S. (2003). Pupil perspectives on the contribution of information and communication technology to teaching and learning in the secondary school. Research Papers in Education, 18(2), 141–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilks, I., Witteck, T., & Pietzner, V. (2010). Using multimedia learning aids from the Internet for teaching chemistry – Not as easy as it seems? In S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Multiple literacy and science education: ICTS in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 49–69). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginns, P. (2005). Meta-analysis of the modality effect. Learning and Instruction, 15, 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (1988). Misleading illustrations. Research in Science Education, 18(1), 290–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirriemuir, J., & McFarlane, A. (2004). Report 8: Literature review in games learning. A report for NESTA Futurelab. http://www.nestafuturelab.org/research/reviews/08_01.htm

  • Koeber, C. (2005). Introducing multimedia presentations and a course website to an introductory sociology course: How technology affects student perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Teaching Sociology, 33(3), 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker’s voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 419–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, R. (2006). Does the modality principle hold for different media? A test of the methods-affects-learning hypothesis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, W. (2010). Empowering students to be scientifically literate through digital literacy. In S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Multiple literacy and science education: ICTS in formal and informal learning environments (pp. 11–31). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paivio, A. (2006). Mind and its evolution; a dual coding theoretical interpretation. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pizzighello, S., & Bressan, P. (2008). Auditory attention causes visual inattentional blindness. Perception, 37(6), 859–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ploetzner, R., Bodemer, D., & Neudert, S. (2008). Successful and less successful use of dynamic visualizations. In R. Lowe & W. Schnotz (Eds.), Learning with animation – Research implications for design (pp. 71–91). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. (2000). The interpretive zone between software designers and a science educator: grounding instructional multimedia design in learning theory. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 33, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. (2003). Conditioned pupil disposition, autonomy, and effective use of ICT in science classrooms. Kappa Delta Phi: The Educational Forum, 67(3), 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. (2007). Factors that influence pupil engagement with science simulations: The role of distraction, vividness, logic, instruction and prior knowledge. Chemical Education Research and Practice, 8, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. (Ed.). (2010). Multiple literacy and science education: ICTS in formal and informal learning environments. Hershey: IGI Global.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S. (2011). Using chemistry simulations: Attention capture, selective amnesia and inattentional blindness. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12(1), 40–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, S., Smith, A., & Ainley, M. (2001). Video clips and animation in chemistry CD-ROMS: Student interest and preference. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 47, 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, L., & Finlayson, H. (2003). Does ICT in science really work in the classroom? Part 1, the individual teacher experience. School Science Review, 84(309), 105–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanchez, E., & Garcia-Rodicio, H. (2008). The use of modality in the design of verbal aids in computer based learning environments. Interacting with Computers, 20, 545–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnotz, W., & Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 117–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, N., Andersen, C., Hong, N., Howard, B., & McGee, S. (2004). The influence of metacognitive skills on learners’ memory of information in a hypermedia environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 31(1), 77–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: The pedagogy of content/the content of pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(5), 489–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Testa, I., Monroy, G., & Sassi, E. (2002). Students’ reading images in kinematics: The case of real-time graphs. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 235–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trindade, J., Fiolhais, C., & Almeida, L. (2002). Science learning in virtual environments: A descriptive study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle, J. (2004). Handling and interpreting data in school science. In R. Barton (Ed.), Teaching secondary science with ICT (pp. 107–126). Cambridge: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northumbria University, Newcastle, England, UK

    Susan Rodrigues

Authors
  1. Susan Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan Rodrigues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Natural Sciences & Science Education, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Walk 1, Singapore, 637616, Singapore

    Kim Chwee Daniel Tan

  2. , Dept of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Victoria, Victoria, V8W 2Y2, British Columbia, Canada

    Mijung Kim

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodrigues, S. (2012). Using Simulations in Science: An Exploration of Pupil Behaviour. In: Tan, K., Kim, M. (eds) Issues and Challenges in Science Education Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation