Advertisement

Epilogue

  • Peter Kroes
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 6)

Abstract

In this epilogue I start with a recapitulation of the dual-nature thesis of technical artefacts while highlighting its main innovative features in comparison to existing theories of technical artefacts and technical functions. Then, looking ahead to interesting topics of further research, I propose to shift attention from technical artefacts taken in isolation, as I have done in this book, to technical artefacts as embedded within social systems. These broader systems are usually referred to as ‘socio-technical’ systems. The notion of a socio-technical system opens up new and interesting ways to study the mutual interaction between the technical and the social world and is rapidly gaining currency in various fields of study. However, a clear conceptualization of this kind of system is still lacking. As their name already indicates, socio-technical systems seem to have a hybrid nature as well, but a brief look suffices to show that the kind of hybridity encountered here is different from the hybridity of technical artefacts.

Keywords

Technical Function Social World Technical System Dual Nature Social Object 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bauer, Johannes M., and Paulien M. Herder. 2009. Designing socio-technical systems. In Philosophy of technology and engineering sciences, ed. Anthonie Meijers, 601–630. Elsevier.Google Scholar
  2. Franssen, Maarten, and Bjorn Jespersen. 2009. From nutcracking to assisted driving: stratified instrumental systems and the modeling of complexity. Paper presented at the Second international symposium on engineering systems, MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June 15–17 2009Google Scholar
  3. Geels, Frank W. 2005. Technological transistions and systems innovations; a co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publ. Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Hughes, Thomas P. 1987. The evolution of large technological systems. In The social construction of technological systems. New directions in the sociology and history of technology, eds. W.E. Bijker, T.P. Hughes, and T.J. Pinch, 51–82. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. INCOSE. 2004. Systems engineering handbook, Version 2a. International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE).Google Scholar
  6. Kroes, Peter, Maarten Franssen, Ibo van de Poel, and Maarten Ottens. 2006. Treating socio-­technical systems as engineering systems: some conceptual problems. Systems research and behavioral science 23:803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ropohl, Günther. 1999. Philosophy of socio-technical systems. Society for philosophy and ­technology 4 (3):59–71.Google Scholar
  8. Vermaas, Pieter E., Peter Kroes, Ibo van de Poel, Maarten Franssen, and Wybo Houkes. 2011. A philosophy of technology; from technical artefacts to sociotechnical systems. Synthesis ­lectures on engineers, technology and society: Morgan & Claypool.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Kroes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations