Abstract
The concept of a “scientific philosophy” (wissenschaftliche Philosophie) first developed in the mid nineteenth century, as a reaction against what was viewed as the excessively speculative and metaphysical character of post-Kantian German idealism. One of the primary intellectual models of this movement was a celebrated address by Hermann von Helmholtz, “Über das Sehen des Menschen,” delivered at the dedication of a monument to Kant at Königsberg in 1855. Helmholtz begins by asking, on behalf of the audience, why a natural scientist like himself is speaking in honor of a philosopher. This question only arises, he says, because of the current deplorable climate of enmity and mutual distrust between the two fields – a climate which is due, in Helmholtz’s opinion, to the entirely speculative system of Naturphilosophie that Schelling and Hegel have erected wholly independent of, and even in open hostility towards, the actual positive results of the natural sciences. What Helmholtz is now recommending, however, is a return to the close cooperation between the two fields exemplified in the work of Kant, who himself made significant contributions to natural science (in his nebular hypothesis put forward in 1755), and, in general, “stood in relation to the natural sciences together with the natural scientists on precisely the same fundamental principles.”1 And it was this recommendation that was enthusiastically embraced within the emerging “back to Kant!” movement, where it led to the idea that all metaphysics should be replaced by the new discipline of “epistemology” or “theory of knowledge” (Erkenntnistheorie), so that philosophy itself would now become “scientific.”
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Carnap, R. (1934) Logische Syntax der Sprache. Wien: Springer. Translated as The Logical Syntax of Language. London: Kegan Paul, 1937.
Carnap, R. (1939) “Foundations of Logic and Mathematics.” In O. Neurath, R. Carnap, and C. W. Morris, eds. International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, vol. 1, nos. 1-5. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 139-213.
Carnap, R. (1950) “Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 11: 20-40. Reprinted in Meaning and Necessity. Second Edition. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, pp. 205-229.
Carnap, R. (1963) “Intellectual Autobiography.” In P. Schilpp, ed. The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 3-84.
Friedman, M. (2006) “Carnap and Quine: Twentieth-Century Echoes of Kant and Hume.” Philosophical Topics 34: 35-58.
Helmholtz, H. von (1865) Vorträge und Reden. 2 vols. Braunschweig: Vieweg. Fifth Edition, 1903.
Hertz, P. and M. Schlick, eds. (1921) Hermann v. Helmholtz: Schriften zur Erkenntnistheorie. Berlin: Springer. Translated as Hermann von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings. Dordrecht: Reidel, 1977.
Quine, W. V. (1948) “On What There Is.” Review of Metaphysics 2: 21-38. Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953, pp. 1-19.
Quine, W. V. (1951) “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” Philosophical Review 60: 20- 43. Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, pp. 20-46.
Quine, W. V. (1960) Word and Object. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T Press.
Quine, W. V. (1969) “Reply to Chomsky.” In D. Davidson and J. Hintikka, eds. Words and Objections: Essays on the Work of W. V. Quine. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 302-311.
Quine, W. V. (1971) “Homage to Rudolf Carnap.” In R. Buck and R. Cohen, eds. PSA 1970: In Memory of Rudolf Carnap: Proceedings of the 1970 Biennial Meeting, Philosophy of Science Association. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. xxii-xvi. Reprinted in R. Creath, ed. Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine-Carnap Correspondence and Related Work. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1990, pp. 463-466.
Quine, W. V. (1974) The Roots of Reference. La Salle: Open Court.
Quine, W. V. (1986) “Autobiography of W. V. Quine.” In P. Schilpp, ed. The Philosophy of W. V. Quine. La Salle: Open Court, pp. 3-46.
Quine, W. V. (2003) “1946 Lectures on David Hume’s Philosophy.” Ed. J. G. Buickerood, Eighteenth-Century Thought 1: 171-254.
Schuldenfrei, R. (1972) “Quine in Perspective.” Journal of Philosophy 69: 5-16.
Wittgenstein, L. (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Friedman, M. (2012). Scientific Philosophy from Helmholtz to Carnap and Quine. In: Creath, R. (eds) Rudolf Carnap and the Legacy of Logical Empiricism. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3929-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3929-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3928-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3929-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)