Abstract
There has been a tendency to describe each generation in terms of how it differs from the previous generation that spawns it. Comparisons often portray more recent generations as somehow lacking the morality, diligence and intellectual capability of older generations. Much has been written about Generations X, Y and Z, their characteristics and educational implications of these. This chapter discusses popular descriptions of these generations and subjects these descriptions to scrutiny. Beginning teachers’ experiences with young people in their classes offer a source of evidence to consider whether students’ behaviour is well explained in terms of ‘Gen X, Y or Z’ generalisations. These experiences provoke discussion as to whether a school system designed by (and perhaps for) older generations suits the needs and demands of current school populations. The chapter draws on recent thinking in sociocultural theories of motivation, notions of transition into adulthood and constructions of adolescence. These provide insights into relationships between student and school that contribute to a more fruitful interpretation of beginning teachers’ experiences with students. The chapter concludes by questioning if there is a sound match between current schooling and the young people whose learning it purports to serve.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andrews, A. (1981). Quirky quotations for speakers and writers. Melbourne, Australia: Sun Books.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2005). Australian social trends 2005. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth of Australia.
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Cote, J. E., & Levine, C. G. (2000). Attitude versus aptitude: Is intelligence or motivation more important for positive higher-educational outcomes? Journal of Adolescent Research, 15(1), 58–80.
Ivanova, A., & Smrikarov, A. (2009). The new generations of students and the future of e-learning in higher education. International Conference on e-Learning and the Knowledge Society. e-Learning ‘09. European Commission. Berlin, Germany. http://www.iit.bas.bg/esf/docs/2009/TheNewGenerationsStudentsFutureE-learningHigherEdu.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2011.
Maras, P., & Redmayne, T., with Hall. C, Braithwaite, D., & Prio, P. (1997). ‘Helicopter children’ and ‘butterfly brains’. ADHD: Perceptions, issues and implications. Educational and Child Psychology, 14(1), 39–49.
Paris, S. G. (1997). Situated motivation and informal learning. Journal of Museum Education, 22(2 & 3), 22–26.
Roberts, B. W., Edmonds, G., & Grijalva, E. (2010). It is developmental me, not generation me: Development changes are more important than generational changes in narcissism—Commentary on Trzesniewski & Donnellan. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 97–102.
te Riele, K. M., & Wyn, J. G. (2005). Australia: Transformation in youth transition. In N. Bagnall (Ed.), Youth transition in a globalised marketplace (pp. 119–139). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
Trzesniewski, K. H., & Donnellan, M. B. (2010). Rethinking “Generation Me”: A study of cohort effects from 1976–2008. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(1), 58–75.
Turner, J., & Paris, S. G. (1995). How literacy tasks influence children’s motivation for literacy. The Reading Teacher, 48(8), 662–673.
Twenge, J. M. (2006). Generation Me: Why today’s young Americans are more confident, assertive, entitled—And more miserable than ever before. New York: Free Press.
Twenge, J. M., & Foster, J. D. (2008). Mapping the scale of the narcissism epidemic: Increases in narcissism 2002–2007 within ethnic groups. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(6), 1619–1622.
Twenge, J. M., Konrath, S., Foster, J. D., Campbell, K. W., & Bushman, B. J. (2008). Ego inflating over time: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of the narcissistic personality. Journal of Personality, 76(4), 875–902.
Walker, R. (2010). Motivating science undergraduates: Ideas and interventions. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 1–13.
Walker, R., Pressick-Kilborn, K., Sainsbury, E., & MacCallum, J. (2010). A sociocultural approach to motivation: A long time coming but here at last. In T. Urdan & S. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: The next decade of research in motivation and achievement (Vol. 16B, pp. 1–42). Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
Wyn, J., & Woodman, D. (2006). Generation, youth and social change in Australia. Journal of Youth Studies, 9(5), 495–514.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schuck, S., Aubusson, P., Buchanan, J., Russell, T. (2012). The Kids Today: Alphabet Generations in Transition. In: Beginning Teaching. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3901-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3901-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3900-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3901-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)