Abstract
What about the relationship between safety and quality of life? How is it recognisable, how is it perceived and how theorisable and measurable is this relationship? How fear affects individual and social well-being? The Italian Citizens Safety Survey, carried out the last time in 2008 and 2009, allows all these questions to be answered since both subjective and objective aspects of criminality as well as their impact on quality of life are addressed.
The international debate on the role of fear, victimisation and social and environmental decay on well-being and on the several ways to measure fear is very complex and shows the need for a multidisciplinary and multidimensional approach to the “safety perception” phenomenon. Also, data analysis confirms that a unidirectional link between individual victimisation and fear of criminality does not exist: perception of insecurity is also caused by generic anxiety related to individual and social variables, such as age, gender, economic conditions, cultural resources and social networks.
But how do we operationalise concepts like “safety” or “insecurity” and their “perception”? In this perspective, it is important to jointly analyse subjective and objective dimensions, as the perceived or real fear of becoming a victim, the safety perception in public and private spaces and the worry of crimes (Butler G, Mathews A, Adv Behav Res Ther 25:273–280, 1983; Adv Behav Res Ther II(5), 1987). The performed analyses (correspondence analysis, clustering and logistic) raised an interesting and complex framework: from one side, the highlighted panorama is very objective, where fear and worry of crime are strongly related to the suffered victimisation, the social and environmental decay and the foreseen risk of becoming a victim; from the other side, in the absence of concrete risk situations, fear seems to be related to the weakness of social communication and contacts and to the socio-economic and individual vulnerability.
Considering the complexity of this scenario, which includes both subjective and objective components strongly related to quality of life, the definition of synthetic indicators, aimed at studying the impact of safety on quality of life, is needed even though it is not easy to be performed. Further work is required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Interesting in this sense the analysis of S. Roché who, thoroughly analysing in a diachronic perspective the relationship between the presumed growth of crime and the spreading of insecurity, identifies in the periods of the end of century – more specifically end of the nineteenth and twentieth century – some attention points of the positive criminal schools (Italian and foreign) on the themes of social preservation from crime and social safety in a general sense, more tied to the movements of decomposition and recomposition of the social identity and balances than to the true increase in criminal rates.
- 2.
Refer to paragraph 3 for identification and presentation of the objective and subjective indicators of fear and worry.
- 3.
The authors give the example of airplane accidents, which are in effect perceived and feared as being more frequent than they truly are, in virtue of the catastrophic and uncontrollable effect that they generate when they occur. As a result, conclude the authors, we introject their impact on our lives deeper than what should be attributed to them.
- 4.
The analysis was carried out by SAS software (Statistical Analysis System) and SPAD (Système Portable pour Analyse des Données) statistical software. In particular, the performed multiple correspondence analysis allowed the experience elements and the expressive elements to be linearly combined by extracting the factorial axes on which the individuals have been subsequently classified. For this purpose, the mixed, not hierarchic, classification technique was used (SEMIS), which allows us to identify clusters of individuals, namely, social “ideal types” of acting in presence of fear of crime and the sense of personal insecurity.
- 5.
The authors applied the “optimist” formula of Benzecrì which is used to re-evaluate the percentage of inertia explained by the first and most important identified factors.
References
Barbagli, M. (1998). Reati, vittime, sicurezza dei cittadini. Rome: Istat.
Bauman, Z. (2000). Social issues of law and order. British Journal of Criminology, 40(2), 205–221.
Bauman, Z. (2006). Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bauman, Z., & Vecchi, B. (2004). Identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bolasco, S. (1999). Analisi multidimensionale dei dati. Roma: Carocci editore.
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1983). Cognitive process in anxiety. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy, 25, 273–280.
Butler, G., & Mathews, A. (1987). Anticipatory anxiety and risk perception. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy , II(5).
Farrall, S., Bannister, J., Ditton, J., & Gilchrist, E. (2000). Social psychology and fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 40(3), 399–413.
Farrall, S., Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2006). Combining the new and old measures of the fear of crime: Exploring the “worried-well”. University of Oxford, London School of Economics.
Farrall, S., Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2007a). Theorising the fear of crime: The cultural and social significance of insecurities about crime. University of Oxford, London School of Economics.
Farrall, S., Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2007b). Everyday emotion and the fear of crime: preliminary findings from experience and expression. University of Oxford, London School of Economics.
Gabriel, U., & Greve, W. (2003). The psychology of fear of crime. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 600–614.
Garland, D. (2001). The culture of control: Crime and social order in contemporary society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. (Trans. it. (1994). Le conseguenze della modernità. Bologna: Il Mulino.)
Gray, E., & Jackson, J. (2007). Functional fear: Adaptational features of worry about crime. London: School of Economics.
Greenacre, M. J. (1984). Theory and application of correspondence analysis. London: Academic.
Greenberg, J. (1986). Determinants of perceived fairness of performance evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 340–342.
Hale, C. (1996). Fear of crime: Review of literature. International Review of Victimology, 4, 79–150.
LaGrange, R., Ferraro, L., & Supancic, M. (1992). Perceived risk and fear of crime: The role of social and physical incivilities. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29, 311–334.
Lebart, L., Morineau, A., & Piron, M. (1997). Statistique exploratorie multidimensionelle. Paris: Dunod.
Lee, M. (2001). The genesis of fear of crime. Theoretical Criminology, 5(4), 467–485.
Liska, A. E., Sanchirico, A., & Reed, M. D. (1988). Fear of crime and constrained behavior specifying and estimating reciprocal effects model. Social Forces, 66(3), 827–837.
Magni, S. F. (2003). Capacità, libertà e diritti: Amartya Sen e Martha Nussbaum. Filosofia politica, 3, 497–506.
Muratore, M. G., & Arsani, S. (2004). Le vittime. In R. Selmini (Ed.), La sicurezza urbana. Bologna: Il Mulino.
Muratore, M. G., Tagliacozzo, G., & Federici, A. (2004). La Sicurezza dei Cittadini. Reati, vittime, percezione della sicurezza e sistemi di protezione. Istat, collana informazioni, n. 25.
Roché, S. (1988). Insécurité, sentiment d’insécurité et recomposition du social: deux fins de siécle. In Revue internationale d’action communautaire, n. 19.
Roché, S. (2000). La théorie de la vitre cassée en France. Inciviltés et désordres public. Revue française de science politique, 50(3), 387–412.
Sabbadini, L. L., & Muratore, M. G. (2003). Fear of crime, in towards a safety society. In Atti della international conference on crime. Rome: Istat.
Sen, A. K. (2001). Freedom, rationality, and social choice: The arrow lectures and other essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. K. (2004). Rationality and freedom. Harvard: Harvard Belknap Press.
Sen, A. K. (2010). The idea of justice. London: Harvard University Press/Allen Lane.
Skogan, W. G. (1981). Issues in the measurement of victimisation. U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
Skogan, W. G. (1987). The impact of victimization on fear. Crime and Delinquency, 33, 135–154.
Skogan, W. G., & Maxfield, M. (1981). Coping with crime. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Stanko, E. A. (1990). When precaution is normal: A feminist critique of crime prevention. In Feminist perspectives in criminology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Taylor, R. B., & Hale, M. (1986). Testing alternative models of fear of crime. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 151–189.
Tyler, T. R. (1980). Impact of directly and indirectly experienced events: The origin of crime-related judgements and behaviours. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 13–28.
Tyler, T. R. (1984). Assessing the risk of crime victimisation: The integration of personal victimisation experience and socially transmitted information. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 27–38.
Van der Wurff, A., & Stringer, P. (1988). Measuring fear of crime in residential surroundings. In Environmental social psychology. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Federici, A., Muratore, M.G., Squillante, D. (2012). The Quality of Life Measured Through the Subjective Indicators of Safety: Fear, Worry About Crime and the Risk of Criminality . In: Maggino, F., Nuvolati, G. (eds) Quality of life in Italy. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3898-0_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3898-0_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3897-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3898-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)