Skip to main content

From Composite Indicators to Partial Orders: Evaluating Socio-Economic Phenomena Through Ordinal Data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Quality of life in Italy

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 48))

Abstract

In this paper we present a new methodology for the statistical evaluation of ordinal socio-economic phenomena, with the aim of overcoming the issues of the classical aggregative approach based on composite indicators. The proposed methodology employs a benchmark approach to evaluation and relies on partially ordered set (poset) theory, a branch of discrete mathematics providing tools for dealing with multidimensional systems of ordinal data. Using poset theory and the related Hasse diagram technique, evaluation scores can be computed without performing any variable aggregation into composite indicators. This way, ordinal scores need not be turned into numerical values, as often done in evaluation studies, inconsistently with the real nature of the phenomena at hand. We also face the problem of “weighting” evaluation dimensions, to account for their different relevance, and show how this can be handled in pure ordinal terms. A specific focus is devoted to the binary variable case, where the methodology can be specialized in a very effective way. Although the paper is mainly methodological, all of the basic concepts are illustrated through real examples pertaining to material deprivation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the original dataset, variable HS120 is recorded on a six grade scale; to reduce the number of profiles, in this example it has been recorded in a dichotomous form. Original grades 1–3 have been collapsed into “1 – Yes” and original grades 4–6 have been collapsed into “0 – No”.

  2. 2.

    In this chapter, we do not deal with the problem of the identification of such benchmarks and assume them as given. In practice, however, reference units should be determined through some preliminary analysis based on both the socio-economic context and the goals pursued by the decision-makers interested in the evaluation process.

  3. 3.

    The choice of the value 0.5M can be justified according to a fuzzy approach, as the simplest way to represent numerically the judges’ uncertainty.

  4. 4.

    We write the evaluation functions explicating the thresholds, to recall that they depend upon them.

  5. 5.

    It is worth noticing that in extending the partial order, care must be taken not to add conflicting comparabilities; otherwise, P would contain loops and would not be a poset. Therefore, the comparabilities to add cannot be chosen arbitrarily, since the partial order structure imposes logical constraints to the extension procedure.

  6. 6.

    We recall that the aim of this chapter is mainly methodological and that the relevance poset introduced in the text has just an exemplificative purpose.

References

  • Alkire, S., & Foster J. (2007). Counting and multidimensional poverty measures. OPHI working paper series 7. Oxford: University of Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubley, R., & Dyer, M. (1999). Faster random generation of linear extensions. Discrete Mathematics, 201, 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cerioli, A., & Zani S. (1990). A fuzzy approach To the measurement Of poverty. In C. Dagum, & Zenga, M (Eds.), Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty (pp. 272–284). Berlino/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey, B. A., & Priestley, B. H. (2002). Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Finetti, B. (1931). Sul concetto di media. Giornale dell’Istituto Italiano degli Attuari, 13, 369–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, M., & Nardo, M. (2003). Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. OECD science, technology and industry working papers, 2003/16. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattore, M., Brueggemann, R., & Owsiński, J. (2011). Using poset theory to compare fuzzy multidimensional material deprivation across regions. In S. Ingrassia, R. Rocci, & M. Vichi (Eds.), New perspectives in statistical modeling and data analysis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagerty, M. R., & Land, K. C. (2007). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights. Sociological Methods and Research, 35(4), 455–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, R. D., Breivik, E., & Wilcox, J. B. (2007). Reconsidering formative measurement. Psychological Methods, 12(2), 205–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmi, A., & Betti, G. (2006). Fuzzy set approach to multidimensional poverty measurement. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda, G., & Nardo, M. (2009). Noncompensatory/non linear composite indicators for ranking countries: A defensible setting. Applied Economics , 41(12), 1513–1523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., & Giovannini E. (2005). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and userguide. Statistics working paper. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neggers, J., & Kim, H. S. (1988). Basic posets. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll, H. H. (2009). Measuring and monitoring the quality of life, Lecture at the Università degli Studi di Firenze, April 23–24, 2009. Available at http://www.starse.it/joomla/en/seminars-and-workshop.

  • Patil, G. P., & Taillie, C. (2004). Multiple indicators, partially ordered sets, and linear extensions: Multi-criterion ranking and prioritization. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 11, 199–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, A. K. (2008). Measurement of social development: An international comparison. Social Indicators Research, 86(1), 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, B. (2003). Ordered sets. Boston, Birkhäuser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, A., & Salzman, J. (2004). Methodological choices encountered in the construction of composite indices of economic and social well-being. Ottawa: Center for the Study of Living Standards.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marco Fattore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fattore, M., Maggino, F., Colombo, E. (2012). From Composite Indicators to Partial Orders: Evaluating Socio-Economic Phenomena Through Ordinal Data. In: Maggino, F., Nuvolati, G. (eds) Quality of life in Italy. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 48. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3898-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics