Advertisement

Kirghiz in Little Kara Köl: The Forces of Modernisation in Southern Xinjiang

  • Hermann KreutzmannEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research book series (AAHER)

Abstract

The Chinese modernisation programme has affected even the remotest high mountain pastures of Xinjiang. The dynamics of such processes are exemplified in a case study from the Chinese Pamirs and are analysed in regard to their importance for adaptation and development. Based on a diachronic examination of transformation processes related to Kirghiz nomads, special emphasis is put on four stages of transformation that might lead from mobile pastoralism to a township settlement. Developments affecting the Kirghiz nomads of Little Kara Köl may be classified as transformations in space and time, resulting in the integration of this marginal region into the permanently settled areas of Xinjiang. Externalities in the field of social structure and political administration have supported this integration and growing dependence on the commercial and service centres of the foreland oases.

Keywords

Modernisation Resettlement Kirghiz Pamir Kizil Su Xinjiang 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Archival and empirical evidence presented in this chapter was collected during the last 20 years, with generous funding provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the Volkswagen Foundation which is gratefully acknowledged.

Notes

1. The current state of affairs is described by An et al. (2011, 123): ‘At present, the prefecture has contracted out approximately 80.5% of the pastures’.

2. The name of Bulunkul dadui (production brigade) was changed into Fanxiu dadui in 1967. In 1984, it was renamed as Bulunkul xiang (autonomous village). The settlement covers an area of 4,585 km2 of which 31,290 ha are identified as pastures and 665 ha as forage grassland for fodder production.

3. Economic and livestock data for 2009 were kindly provided by Ms. Zhao Lixin, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumchi.

4. Compared to the distribution in Akto County – 26.5% in the livestock sector and two-thirds in remaining agricultural activities – the importance of pastoralism in Bulunkul is obvious. Areawise, only 3.6% are utilised for agriculture, whilst 96.4% are classified as mountain pastures (China Statistics Press 2010).

5. The government’s expenditure per house was estimated at 160,000 yuan (app. 24,000 USD).

6.Akto County’s Poverty Alleviation Programme (fu min an ju), Reservoir Resettlement Programme (ku qu yi min ban qian), Nomads Settlement Programme (you mu min ding ju) and the Jiangxi Affordable Housing Dwelling Ceremony (Jiang xi bao zhang xing zhu fang mu min ru zhu yi shi) are applied in Bulunkul xiang. The Reservoir Resettlement Programme has facilitated the resettlement of 451 households (1,643 persons) from the Gez Gorge within Kizil Su due to the implementation of the Bulunkou-Gonggeer Hydropower Project.

7. Whilst the increase in Bulunkul was significant, during the same period, the livestock numbers in the prefecture grew only by a factor of 2.8 (An et al. 2011, 126).

8. Cf. for the proceedings of the conference Xinchun (2011).

9. The quotations are taken from the English simultaneous translation of the presentation by Zhao Xinchun, deputy director and chief scientist of Animal Husbandry, during the regional workshop in Kashgar on July 20, 2010; cf. Zhao Xinchun (2011).

References

  1. Abramzon SM (1963) The Kirgiz of the Chinese people’s republic. Central Asian Rev 11(2):196–207Google Scholar
  2. An S-Z, Dai Jian L, Zhaohui MY, Xiao-Yuan L (2011) Pastoralism in China’s Xinjiang Kizilsu Kirghiz autonomous prefecture. In: Kreutzmann H, Abdulalishoev K, Zhaohui L, Richter J (eds) Regional workshop in Khorog and Kashgar. Pastoralism and rangeland management in mountain areas in the context of climate and global change. GIZ, Bonn, pp 119–131Google Scholar
  3. Bezkovic AS (1969) Nomadenwirtschaft und Lebensweise der Kirgisen – 19. bis Anfang des 20. Jahrhunderts. In: Földes L (ed) Viehwirtschaft und Hirtenkultur. Ethnographische Studien. Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, pp 94–111Google Scholar
  4. Bregel Y (2003) An historical atlas of Central Asia. Brill, Leiden/BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Centlivres P, Centlivres-Demont M (1983) Frontières et phénomènes migratoires en Asie centrale: Le cas de l’Afghanistan de 1880 à nos jours. In: Centlivres-Demont M (ed) Migrations en Asie. Migrants, deplacées et réfugiés. Société suisse d’ethnologie, Bern, pp 83–114Google Scholar
  6. China Statistics Press (2010) Xinjiang statistical yearbook 2010. CSP, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  7. Curzon GN (1896) The Pamirs and the source of the Oxus. Geogr J 8: 15–54, 97–119, 239–264Google Scholar
  8. Di Cosmo N (1993) Reports from the Northwest: a selection of Manchu memorials from Kashgar (1806–1807) (Papers on Inner Asia 25), BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Cosmo N (1994) Ancient inner Asian nomads: their economic basis and its significance in Chinese history. J Asian Stud 53(4):1092–1126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dor R, Naumann CM (1978) Die Kirghisen des Afghanischen Pamir. Akademische Druck- und Verlagsanstalt, GrazGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubeux L, Valmont V (1848) L’Univers, ou histoire et description de tous les peuples, de leurs religions, moeurs, coutumes, etc.: Tartarie. In: Tartarie, Beloutchistan, Boutan et Népal, Dubeux, Louis, V. Valmont, and Xavier Raymond and in Afghanistan, Xavier Raymond. Firmin Didot, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. General Staff India (1907) Military report on Kashgaria prepared in the division of the Chief of the Staff. Intelligence Branch, Simla (IOL/MIL/17/14/74)Google Scholar
  13. General Staff India (1929) Military report on Sinkiang (Chinese Turkestan). Government of India Press, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  14. Giese E, Zeng G (1993) Regionale Aspekte der Öffnungspolitik der VR China. Geographische Zeitschrift 81(3):176–195Google Scholar
  15. Gillett MC (1937) Report on Vice-Consul Gillett’s tour to Keria via Yarkand, Karghalik and Khotan. Kashgar (IOL/P&S/12/2336)Google Scholar
  16. Hartmann M (1908) Chinesisch-Turkestan. Geschichte, Verwaltung, Geistesleben und Wirtschaft (= Angewandte Geographie. Hefte zur Verbreitung geographischer Kenntnisse in ihrer Beziehung zum Kultur- und Wirtschaftsleben 3. Reihe, 4. Band). Gebauer-Schwetschke, Halle a. S.Google Scholar
  17. Hedin SA (1894) Forschungen über die physische Geographie des Hochlandes von Pamir im Frühjahr 1894. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Erdkunde zu Berlin 29:289–338Google Scholar
  18. Hedin SA (1899) Durch Asiens Wüsten. Drei Jahre auf neuen Wegen in Pamir, Lop-Nor, Tibet und China, 2 vols. Brockhaus, Leipzig. English translation: (1899) Through Asia, 2 vols. Harper, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Lo JP (1961) Five years of the Sinkiang-Uigur autonomous region, 1955–1960. China Q 8:92–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McMillen DH (1979) Chinese communist power and policy in Xinjiang, 1949–1977. Westview Press, Boulder/FolkestoneGoogle Scholar
  21. Millward JA (1998) Beyond the pass. Economy, ethnicity, and empire in Qing Central Asia, 1759–1864. Stanford University Press, StanfordGoogle Scholar
  22. Millward JA (2007) Eurasian crossroads. A history of Xinjiang. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Mydral J (1979) The silk road: a journey from the High Pamirs and Ili through Sinkiang and Kansu. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Olufsen O (1904) Through the unknown Pamirs. The second Danish Pamir expedition 1898–1899. William Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Shahrani MN (1979) The Kirghiz and Wakhi of Afghanistan. Adaptation to closed frontiers. University of Washington Press, Seattle/LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. von Schultz A (1910) Volks- und wirtschaftliche Studien im Pamir. Petermanns Geographische Mitteilungen 5:250–254Google Scholar
  27. von Schultz A (1921) Kaschgar (Chinesisch-Turkestan), Stadt und Landschaft. Mitteilungen aus dem Seminar für Geographie der Hamburger Universität, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  28. Xinchun Z (2011) Pastoralism in Xinjiang: implementing the pastoralist settlement programme to promote sustainable development of pastoralism in Xinjiang. In: Kreutzmann H, Abdulalishoev K, Zhaohui L, Richter J (eds) Regional workshop in Khorog and Kashgar. Pastoralism and rangeland management in mountain areas in the context of climate and global change. GIZ, Bonn, pp 182–188Google Scholar
  29. Yin M et al (eds) (1990) Die nationalen Minderheiten in China. Verlag für Fremdsprachige Literatur, BeijingGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human Geography, Department of Earth Sciences, Centre for Development Studies (ZELF) and Institute of Geographical SciencesFreie Universität BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations