Abstract
This chapter draws on observations from anthropological fieldwork in a flood-prone area in northeast Siberia to comment on how rural residents assess and “process” destructive consequences of floods in their interaction with water and multiple water governance scales. The massive Soviet “river-turning” projects figure prominently in the development programmes in the Tatta District, an area that has suffered from drought for several decades. Due to the state programme for transporting water from the Lena River, the largest in northeast Siberia, to Tatta, the small Tatta River became a dense network of water management projects. The research demonstrates that the governmental and local agenda for dealing with increased flooding – the causes of such a departure from the norm, the view of “things to be governed” and “how they should be governed” – may differ considerably. This paper focuses on how rural communities search for a balance in their adaptive practices amid several tensions: conflicting attributions of disaster to dams and irrigation constructions as opposed to natural changes; the threat of increased flooding alongside a practical need for development projects; and the clash between the governmental ‘emergency’ approach and communities’ long-term adaptive practices.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adamov, D. (2010). Churapcha rulit! Nemnogo ob alasnom patriotizme (Churapcha governs! A little bit about alaas patriotism). Yakutsk vechernii, December 24.
ADRC (2006). Asian Disaster Reduction Center. Country report. Russia. http://www.adrc.asia/countryreport/RUS/2005/english.pdf. Retrieved 5 Dec 2009.
Alekseev, E. E. (1996). Priznayu vinovnym… Sluzhba bezopasnosti respubliki Sakha (Yakutia) (I declare you guilty of… Security Service of the Republic of Salkha (Yakutia). Moscow: Concern LD.
Alekseev, A. (2007). Nikto ne znaet tochno, v chem. prichina uchastivshikhsya navodnenii v Yakutii (Nobody knows exactly what the reason for increased floods in Yakutia is) Sakha News. http://www.1sn.ru/18234.html. Retrieved 7 Oct 2010.
APN (2005). Asian-Pacific Network for global change research. Institutional capacity in natural disaster risk reduction: A comparative analysis of institutions, national policies, and cooperative responses to flood in Russia. Final report. http://www.apn-gcr.org/newAPN/resources/projectBulletinOutputs/finalProjectReports/2005/APN2005-01-CMY-Nikitina_FinalReport-formatted.pdf. Retrieved 30 Nov 2009.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society, towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
Beck, U. (1999). World risk society. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Berger, A. R. (1998). Environmental change, geoindicators, and the autonomy of nature. Geological Society of America today, January, 3–8.
Berger, A. R. (2008). Rapid landscape changes, their causes, and how they affect human history and culture. The Northern Review, 28, 15–26.
Calhoun, C. (2004). A world of emergencies: Fear, intervention, and the limits of cosmopolitan order. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 41(4), 373–395.
EMERCOM (2004). Ministry of Russian Federation for civil defence, emergencies and elimination of consequences of natural disasters. Country report. http://www.adrc.asia/countryreport/RUS/RUSeng98/index.html. Retrieved 9 Apr 2010.
Forbes, B.C., & Stammler, F. (2009). Arctic climate change discourse: The contrasting politics of research agendas in the West and Russia. Polar Research, 28, 28–42
Gibson, J. J. (1977). The theory of affordance. In R. Shaw & J. Bransford (Eds.), Perceiving, acting and knowing: Toward an ecological psychology (pp. 67–82). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Heijmans, A. (2001). ‘Vulnerability’: A matter of perception. Disaster management working paper 4. London: Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre.
Hettinger, N. (2005). Respecting nature’s autonomy in relationship with humanity. In T. Heyd (Ed.), Recognizing the autonomy of nature: Theory and practice (pp. 86–98). New York: Columbia University Press.
Heyd, T. (2007). Encountering: Toward an environmental culture. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Hirshleifer, J. (1988). Economic behaviour in adversity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ingold, T. (1992). Culture and the perception of the environment. In E. Croll & D. Parkin (Eds.), Bush base: Forest farm. Culture, environment and development (pp. 39–56). London/New York: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment. London: Routledge.
Jencson, L. (2001). Disastrous rites: Liminality and communitas in a flood crisis. Anthropology and Humanism, 26(1), 46–58.
Leroy, S. (2006). From natural hazard to environmental catastrophe: Past and present. Quaternary International, 158(1), 4–12.
Levochkin, V. (2008). Sezon vody (Season of water). Rossiiskaya gazeta, March 31.
Lopatin, A. (2010). Kihini erei yöreter (Disaster teaches human beings). Sybehit, 1, 2–3.
Lopatina, L. (2009). Puti sokraszeniia uszerba ot navodnenii na malykh rekakh (na primere reki Tatta). (Ways of mitigating the damage from floods on small rivers: the case of the Tatta River). In Sbornik rabot molodykh issledovateli programmy’Shag v buduszee’ (Edited volume: Papers of young researchers in the programme: ‘Step into the future’, pp. 47–51). Yakutsk: Bargaryy.
Marková, I., & Gillespie, A. (Eds.). (2008). Trust and distrust: Sociocultural perspectives. Greenwich: Information Age Publishing.
Micklin, P. P. (1987). The status of the Soviet Union’s north–south water transfer projects before their abandonment in 1985–1986. Soviet Geography: Review and Translations, 20, 287–329.
Oliver-Smith, A. (1999). What is a disaster? Anthropological perspectives on a persistent question. In S. Hoffman & A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), The angry earth: Disaster in anthropological perspective (pp. 18–34). New York/London: Routledge.
Oliver-Smith, A. (2002). Theorizing disasters: Nature, power, and culture. In S. Hoffman & A. Oliver-Smith (Eds.), Catastrophe and culture: The anthropology of disaster (pp. 23–47). Oxford: School of American Research Press.
Regnum.ru (2004). Lenskaya voda prishla v Churapchu i Tattu (Yakutia) (Water of the Lena River came to Churapcha and to Tatta (Yakutia)). Regnum. http://www.regnum.ru/news/316970.html. Retrieved 7 Oct 2010.
Revich, B. (Ed.). (2008). Climate change impact on public health in the Russian Arctic. Moscow: United Nations in the Russian Federation.
Rose, N. (1996). The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25(3), 327–356.
Roshydromet. (2005). Strategic prediction for the period of up to 2010–2015 of climate change expected in Russia and its impact on sectors of the Russian national economy. Moscow: Roshydromet.
Salva, A. M. (1999). Cryogenic processes in engineering-geologic investigations for water-supply objects in transriverine regions of central Yakutia. Hydrotechnical Construction, 33(5), 307–312.
Stammler-Gossmann, A. (2010a). ‘Translating’ vulnerability at the community level: Case study from the Russian north. In G. K. Hovelsrud & B. Smit (Eds.), Community adaptation and vulnerability in Arctic regions (pp. 131–162). Dordrecht: Springer.
Stammler-Gossmann, A. (2010b). ‘Political’ animals of Sakha Yakutia. In F. Stammler & H. Takakura (Eds.), Good to eat, good to live with: Nomads and animals in northern Eurasia and Africa (pp. 153–175). Sendai: Tohoku University.
Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance. Accounts of worth in economic life. Princeton/Woodstock: Princeton University Press.
Sukhoborov, V. (2006). Problems linked to the prevention of natural disasters in the Sakha Republic (Yakutia). The 3 rd northern forum FWG meeting. http://www.yakutiatoday.com/events/inter_FWG_emercom.shtml. Retrieved 19 Sept 2009.
Vorobyev, D. (2005). Ruling rivers: Discussion on the river diversion project in the Soviet Union. In A. Rosenholm & S. Autio-Sarasmo (Eds.), Understanding Russian nature: Representations, values and concepts (pp. 177–205). Saarijärvi: Gummerus Printing.
WCDR (2005). National report of the Russian Federation at the world conference on disaster reduction. http://www.unisdr.org/2005/wcdr/preparatory-process/national-reports.htm. Retrieved 7 Dec 2009.
Yanitsky, O. N. (2000). Russian greens in a risk society: A structural analysis. Helsinki: Kikimora Publications.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stammler-Gossmann, A. (2012). The Big Water of a Small River: Flood Experiences and a Community Agenda for Change. In: Tennberg, M. (eds) Governing the Uncertain. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3843-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3843-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3842-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3843-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)