Abstract
Tendency hypotheses – T-hypotheses, for short –, such as “the individuals of the kind Y tend to be X”, are used within several empirical sciences and play an important role in some of them, for instance in social sciences. However, so far T-hypotheses have received little or no attention by philosophers of science and statisticians.1 An exception is the work made in the seventies of the past century by the statisticians and social scientists David K. Hildebrand, James D. Laing, and Howard Rosenthal who worked out – under the label of prediction logic –, an interesting approach to the analysis of T-hypotheses.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Rudolf Carnap (1950/1962), The Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gustavo Cevolani, Vincenzo Crupi, and Roberto Festa (2012), “Features of verisimilitude”, in preparation.
Maurice Duverger (1954), Political Parties. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Roberto Festa (2007a), “Verisimilitude, Cross Classification, and Prediction Logic. Approaching the Statistical Truth by Falsified Qualitative Theories”, in: Mind and Society, 6, pp. 37–62.
Roberto Festa (2007b), “Verisimilitude, Qualitative Theories, and Statistical Inferences”, in: Sami Pihlström, Panu Raatikainen and Matti Sintonen (Eds.), Approaching the Truth. Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. London: College Publications, pp. 143–178.
David K. Hildebrand, James D. Laing, and Howard Rosenthal (1977), Prediction Analysis of Cross Classification. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
George Homans (1961), Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (Ed.) (1987), What is Closer-to-the-Truth?. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Theo A. F. Kuipers (2000). From Instrumentalism to Constructive Realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Seymour M. Lipset (1960), Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. Garden City: Doubleday.
Ilkka Niiniluoto (1987), Truthlikeness. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Graham Oddie (1986), Likeness to Truth. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Karl R. Popper (1963), Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Simone Santini and Ramesh Jain (1999), “Similarity Measures”, in: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21, pp. 871–883.
Amos Tversky (1977), “Features of Similarity”, Psychological Review, 84, pp. 327–352. Reprinted in Amos Tversky, Preference, Belief, and Similarity, Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 2004, pp. 7–45.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Festa, R. (2012). On the Verisimilitude of Tendency Hypotheses. In: Dieks, D., Gonzalez, W., Hartmann, S., Stöltzner, M., Weber, M. (eds) Probabilities, Laws, and Structures. The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3030-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3030-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3029-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3030-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)