Abstract
Bias is inherent in epidemiology, and researchers go to great lengths to avoid introducing bias into their studies. However, some bias is inevitable, and bias due to selection is particularly common. We discuss ways to identify bias and how authors have approached removing or adjusting for bias using statistical methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Breslow, N. E., & Day, N. E. (1980). Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol 1. The analysis of case-control studies. IARC, Lyon.
Cleveland, W. S., & Devlin, S. J. (1988). Locally weighted regression: An approach to regression analysis by local fitting. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 596–610.
Galea, S., & Tracy, M. (2007). Participation rates in epidemiologic studies. Annals of Epidemiology, 17(9), 643–653. available from: ISI:000249293100001.
Geneletti, S., Richardson, S., & Best, N. (2009). Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies. Biostatistics, 10(1), 17–31. available from: PM:18482997.
Greenland, S., & Brumback, B. (2002). An overview of relations among causal modelling methods. International Journal of Epidemiology, 31(5), 1030–1037. available from: PM:12435780.
Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology, 10(1), 37–48. available from: PM:9888278.
Gunby, J. A., Darby, S. C., Miles, J. C. H., Green, B. M. R., & Cox, D. R. (1993). Factors affecting indoor radon concentrations in the United-Kingdom. Health Physics, 64(1), 2–12. available from: ISI:A1993KD26400002.
Henderson, M., & Page, L. (2007). Appraising the evidence: What is selection bias? Evidence-Based Mental Health, 10(3), 67–68. available from: PM:17652553.
Hernan, M. A., Hernandez-Diaz, S., & Robins, J. M. (2004). A structural approach to selection bias. Epidemiology, 15(5), 615–625. available from: PM:15308962.
Law, G. R., Smith, A. G., & Roman, E. (2002). The importance of full participation: Lessons from a national case-control study. British Journal of Cancer, 86(3), 350–355. available from: PM:11875698.
Law, G. R., Parslow, R. C., & Roman, E. (2003). Childhood cancer and population mixing. American Journal of Epidemiology, 158(4), 328–336. available from: PM:12915498.
McNamee, R. (2003). Confounding and confounders. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(3), 227–234. available from: PM:12598677.
Pearl, J. (2000). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pfeffermann, D. (1996). The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 5(3), 239–261. available from: PM:8931195.
Pfeffermann, D., & Sverchkov, M. Y. U. (2003). Fitting generalised linear models under informative sampling. In R. L. Chambers & C. J. Skinner (Eds.), Analysis of survey data (pp. 175–195). Chichester: Wiley.
R Development Core Team. (2004). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Rubin, D. B. (1976). Inference and missing data. Biometrika, 63(3), 581–590. available from: ISI:A1976CP66700021.
Samuelsen, S. O., Anestad, H., & Skrondal, A. (2007). Stratified case-cohort analysis of general cohort sampling designs. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 34(1), 103–119. available from: ISI:000244852300008.
Schlesselman, J. J. (1982). Case-control studies: Design, conduct, analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, A. G., Fear, N. T., Law, G. R., & Roman, E. (2004). Representativeness of samples from general practice lists in epidemiological studies: Case-control study. BMJ, 328(7445), 932. available from: PM:14990513.
The UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators. (2000). The United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study: Objectives, materials and methods. UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators. British Journal of Cancer, 82(5), 1073–1102. available from: PM:10737392.
The UK Childhood Cancer Study Investigators. (2002). The United Kingdom Childhood Cancer Study of exposure to domestic sources of ionising radiation: 1: Radon gas. British Journal of Cancer, 86(11), 1721–1726. available from: PM:12087456.
Tu, Y.-K., West, R. W., Ellison, G. D. H., & Gilthorpe, M. S. (2004). Why evidence for the fetal origins of adult disease can be statistical artifact: The reversal paradox examined for hypertension. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161(1), 27–32.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Law, G.R., Baxter, P.D., Gilthorpe, M.S. (2012). Selection Bias in Epidemiologic Studies. In: Tu, YK., Greenwood, D. (eds) Modern Methods for Epidemiology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3024-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3024-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-3023-6
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-3024-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)