Skip to main content

Studying at Home: With Whom and in Which Way? Homework Practices and Conflicts in the Family

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research ((CHIR,volume 5))

Abstract

In recent years, international comparative studies have provided strong evidence for the powerful influence of students’ socioeconomic background on their educational success. Because the slope of the socioeconomic gradient is particularly steep in Germany, public sensitivity and scientific interest in socialization processes within the family has dramatically increased in this country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    At the end of elementary school (the 4th grade), German students are assigned to different school tracks in order to continue their secondary education. Most students attending the highest track run through the Sekundarstufe I (5th to 10th grade) as well as the Sekundarstufe II (11th to 12th or 13th grade). Having completed their final secondary-school examinations (Abitur), they may apply for courses leading to a bachelor and/or master degree. In contrast, the majority of students attending the middle track (Realschule) or the lowest track (Hauptschule) start their vocational trainings at the end of the 9th or 10th grade.

References

  • Badinter, E. (2010). Der Konflikt. Die Frau und die Mutter. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., & Schümer, G. (2001). Schulformen als selektionsbedingte Lernmilieus. In Deutsches PISA-Konsortium (Ed.), PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 454–467). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., & Nye, B. (2000). Homework in the home: How student, family, and parenting style differences relate to the homework process. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 464–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, H., Robinson, J. C., & Patall, E. A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research, 1987−2003. Review of Educational Research, 76, 1–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Eine Frage der Qualität? Die Rolle der Hausaufgabenqualität für Hausaufgabenverhalten und Leistung. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 37, 196–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reumann, D., Flanagan, C., & Douglas, M. I. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L. (1986). Parent’s reactions to teacher practices of parent involvement. The Elementary School Journal, 86, 277–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. L., Sanders, M. G., Simon, B. S., Salinas, K. C., Jansorn, N. R., & Van Voorhis, F. L. (2002). School, family, and community partnerships: Your handbook for action (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Exeler, J., & Wild, E. (2003). Die Rolle des Elternhauses für die Förderung selbstbestimmten Lernens. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 1, 6–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, J., & Wild, E. (2009). Mit wem wird wie zuhause gelernt? Die Hausaufgabenpraxis im Fach Deutsch. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 37(3), 216–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. L., Walker, J. M. T., Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. (2007). Parents’ motivations for involvement in children’s education: An empirical test of a theoretical model of parental involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 532–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., & Apostoleris, N. H. (2002). What makes parents controlling? In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 161–181). Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grolnick, W. S., Price, C. E., Beiswenger, K. L., & Sauck, C. C. (2007). Evaluative pressure in mothers: Effects of situation, maternal, and child characteristics on autonomy supportive versus controlling behavior. Developmental Psychology, 43, 991–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurland, S. T., & Grolnick, W. S. (2005). Perceived threat, controlling parenting, and children’s achievement orientations. Motivation and Emotion, 29, 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutman, L. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). Stage–environment fit during adolescence: Trajectories of family relations and adolescent outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 43, 522–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, A., Schrader, F. W., & Hosenfeld, I. (2004). Elterliche Lernunterstützung und Schulleistungen ihrer Kinder. Bildung und Erziehung, 57, 251–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtappels, H.-G., Klieme, E., Rauschenbach, T., & Stecher, L. (2007). Ganztagsschule in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der Ausgangserhebung der Studie zur Entwicklung von Ganztagsschulen (StEG). Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference? Teachers College Record, 97(2), 310–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., Walker, J. M. T., & Sandler, H. M. (2005). Parents’ motivations for involvement in their children’s education. In E. N. Patrikakou, R. P. Weisberg, S. Redding, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), School–family partnerships for children’s success (pp. 40–56). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz, F., & Wild, E. (2007). Parental involvement in schooling: Results concerning its structure and impact on students’ motivation. In M. Prenzel & L. Allolio-Näcke (Eds.), Studies on the educational quality of school: The final report on the DFG priority program (pp. 299–316). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattingly, D. J., Prislin, R., McKenzie, T. L., Rodriguez, J. L., & Kayzar, B. (2002). Evaluating evaluations: The case of parent involvement programs. Review of Educational Research, 72(4), 549–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkle, T., & Wippermann, C. (2008). Eltern unter Druck. Selbstverständnisse, Befindlichkeiten und Bedürfnisse von Eltern in verschiedenen Lebenswelten. Stuttgart: Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischo, C. (2006). Der “Saisonarbeiter”– genauer betrachtet. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Parent Teacher Association. (2008). National standards for family-school partnerships assessment guide. Retrieved from http://www.pta.org/National_Standards_Assessment_Guide.pdf

  • Niggli, A., Trautwein, U., Schnyder, I., Lüdtke, O., & Neumann, M. (2007). Elterliche Unterstützung kann hilfreich sein, aber Einmischung schadet: Familiärer Hintergrund, elterliches Hausaufgabenengagement und Leistungsentwicklung. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 54, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). Parental involvement in homework: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 78, 1039–1101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quellenberg, H. (2007). Ganztagsschule im Spiegel der Statistik. In H. G. Holtappels, E. Klieme, T. Rauschenbach, & L. Stecher (Eds.), Ganztagsschule in Deutschland: Ergebnisse der Ausgangserhebung der “Studie zur Entwicklung von Ganztagsschulen (StEG)” (pp. 14–36). Weinheim: Juventa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rammert, M. (2010). Die Effektivität eines Elterntrainings im Hinblick auf kompetenzunterstützendes Verhalten der Eltern im häuslichen Lernkontext: Eine Evaluationsstudie. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw, P. D., & Gardner, R. (1990). Process versus product task interpretation and parental teaching practice. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 13(4), 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacher, W. (2008). Elternarbeit: Gestaltungsmöglichkeiten und Grundlagen für alle Schularten. Bad Heibrunn: Klinkhardt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwinger, M., & Wild, E. (2006). Die Entwicklung von Zielorientierungen im Fach Mathematik von der 3. bis 5. Jahrgangsstufe. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 20, 269–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Köller, O., & Baumert, J. (2001). Lieber oft als viel: Hausaufgaben und die Entwicklung von Leistung und Interesse im Mathematik-Unterricht der 7 Jahrgangsstufe. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 47, 703–724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wild, E., & Gerber, J. (2009). Lernlust statt Lernfrust: Evaluation eines Elterntrainings zur Verringerung von Hausaufgabenkonflikten bei Schülern mit Lernschwierigkeiten. Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 56, 303–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, E., & Lorenz, F. (2010). Elternhaus und Schule. Paderborn: Schöningh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, E., Rammert, M., & Siegemund, A. (2006). Die Förderung selbstbestimmter Formen der Lernmotivation. In M. Prenzel & L. Allolio-Näcke (Eds.), Untersuchungen zur Bildungsqualität von Schule (pp. 370–297). Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittler, C. (2009). Lernlust statt Lernfrust: Evaluation eines Elterntrainings zur Förderung autonomieunterstützender Instruktionsstrategien im häuslichen Lernkontext. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Bielefeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yotyodying, S. (2011, September). Exploring determinants of authoritative and authoritarian parental instruction in learning at home: A cross-cultural comparison between Germany and Thailand. Paper presented at the Emerging Researchers’ Conference as a part of European Conference on Educational Research (ECER) 2011, Berlin, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yotyodying, S. (2012). Antecedents of the quality of home-based family involvement and its impacts on students’ learning motivation, academic well-being, and academic self-regulation competencies: A German-Thai comparison. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Bielefeld University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elke Wild .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wild, E., Yotyodying, S. (2012). Studying at Home: With Whom and in Which Way? Homework Practices and Conflicts in the Family. In: Richter, M., Andresen, S. (eds) The Politicization of Parenthood. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2972-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics