Skip to main content

Insect Conservation Developments in Central Europe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Insect Conservation: Past, Present and Prospects
  • 1077 Accesses

Abstract

Central Europe is situated at the biogeographical crossroads between temperate West and East, between North and South. The character of insect fauna is derived from a long ecological-historical succession which has taken place during Holocene period – at least since the end of the last Pleistocene Ice Age (about 12,000 years B.P.). The Holocene ecological succession started from forest-tundra biomes to various forest types dependent on elevation, diverse geomorphology and postglacial migrations of biota (Firbas 1949; De Lattin 1957; Jeník and Price 1994; Schmitt 2009). During the relatively warmer Holocene postglacial periods only the open mountain ridges, montane glacials cirques and open waterlogged peatbogs and fens preserved non-forest “relict” arctic/subarctic/boreal and alpine insect populations in habitats other than closed forests. Local and scattered dry grassland biomes on rocky limestone or volcanic substrates provided refugia for penetrating xerothermic south-eastern and Mediterranean insect species (De Lattin 1957; Malicky et al. 1983) Both types of azonal locally distributed habitats represent very important paleorefugia (sensu Nekola 1999) for nature conservation projects, with values extending well beyond those for entomology alone. The paleorefugial habitats (biotopes) of dominant forested landscape are preserved in virgin forest conditions also in limited numbers of local places of recent central Europe: natural montane mixed forests, lowland deciduous /oak/ woods and several types of wetland forests. Human-induced impacts on the original postglacial biomes resulted in far-reaching alterations and fragmentation of most types of original ecosystems. For the original primary distribution of natural biomes and reconstruction of vegetation, several mapping projects for some central European countries are available (for example, Neuhäuslová 2001, with plant ecological bibliography) and provide habitat characteristics and basic introductions for investigations of insect communities. Most data are valid across the boundaries of the states and political units, and help to emphasise that the political frontiers of central Europe are not important for local biogeography, insect conservation policy and division of this chapter. The main points that follow apply across the region.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aspöck H (2009) Entomofaunistics as a basic discipline for broad biological research exemplified on the Neuropterida of central Europe: a historical account. Commun Abstr SIEEC 21:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Barták M, Kubík J (eds) (2005) Diptera of Podyjí National Park and its environs. ČZU, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann E (1981) Erfolgreiche Wiedereinbürgerung von Zerynthia polyxena auf einem ehemaligen Weinberg am Stadtrand von Graz. Beih Veröff Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Bad-Württ 21:177–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann A (1951–1955) Die Gross-Schmetterlinge Mitteldeutschlands. Bd. 1–5. Urania-Verlag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezděk A, Jaroš J, Spitzer K (2006) Spatial distribution of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and moths (Lepidoptera) in the Mrtvý luh bog, Šumava Mts (Central Europe): a test of habitat island community. Biodivers Conserv 15:395–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blab J, Kudrna O (1982) Helfsprogramm für Schmetterlinge. Naturschutz aktuel 6:1–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad KFR, Warren MS, Fox R, Parsons MS, Woiwod IP (2006) Rapid declines of common widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biol Conserv 132:279–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabrowski JS, Krzywicki M (1982) Extinct and endangered species of Lepidoptera of Polish fauna. Part 1. Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea, Zygaenoidea. Panstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukove, Warszawa (in Polish, English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • De Lattin G (1957) Grundriss der Zoogeographie. G. Fischer Verlag, Jena/Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert G, Schmid G (eds) (1981) Biotop- und Artenschutz bei Schmetterlingen. Beih Veröff Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Bad-Würt 21:1–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkač J, Král D, Škorpík M (eds) (2005) Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky. Bezobratlí. Red list of threatened species in the Czech Republic. Invertebrates. AOPK, Praha (In Czech and English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Firbas F (1949) Spät- und nacheiszeitliche Waldgeschichte Mitteleuropas nördlich der Alpen. Bd.1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Gepp J (ed) (1983) Rote Listen gefährter Tiere Österreichs. Bundesministerium für. Gesundheit und Umweltschutz, Wien

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilg O (2004) Old-growth forests. Characteristics, conservation and monitoring, vol 74, Habitat and species management- technical report. Atelier technique des espaces naturelles, Montpellier, pp 1–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker H, Müller J (2006) Die Schmetterlinge der bayerischnen Waldreservate. Beiträge zur bayerischnen Entomofaunistik Suplementband 1:5–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann A (2001) The geometrid moths of Europe, vol 1. Apollo Books, Stenstrup

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeník J, Price MF (1994) Biosphere reserves on the crossroad of central Europe. (Man and biosphere project). Empara MAB, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasy F (1981) Naturschutzgebiete in östlichen Österreich als Refugien bemerkenswerter Lepidopterenarten. Beih Veröff Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Bad-Würt 21:109–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepidopterologen-Arbeitsgruppe (1987) Tagfalter und ihre Lebensräume. Band 1. Schweiz Bund für Naturschutz. Fotorotar, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepidopterologen-Arbeitsgruppe (1997) Schmetterlinge und ihre Lebensräume Band 2. Schweiz Bund für Naturschutz. Fotorotar, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozan A, Spitzer K, Jaroš J (2009) Good parasitic wasps gone bad: a short review of two stories of the oceanic and habitat islands. Commun Abstr SIEEC 21:59–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Malicky H, Ant H, Aspöck H, De Jong R, Thaler K, Varga Z (1983) Argumente zur Existenz und Chorologie mitteleuropäischer (extramediterran-europäischer) Faunen-Elemente. Entomol Gen 9:101–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Moog O (ed) (1995) Fauna aquatica Austriaca (A comprehensive species inventory of Austrian aquatic organisms with ecological notes). Version 1995. Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Nekola JC (1999) Paleorefugia and neorefugia: the influence of colonization history on community pattern and process. Ecology 80:2459–2473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuslová Z (ed) (2001) Map of potential natural vegetation of the Czech Republic. Academia, Praha

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR (1997) Butterfly conservation, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák I, Havel L (2006) Atlas šumavských motýlů (Butterflies and moths of the Bohemian Forest Mts – Šumava). Karmášek, České Budějovice (In Czech)

    Google Scholar 

  • Novák I, Spitzer K (1982) Ohrožený svět hmyzu (Endangered world of insects). Academia, Praha (In Czech)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olejníček J, Spitzer K (1984) Hydrophorus signiferus Coquillett 1899 (Dolichopodidae, Diptera) recorded from the South Bohemian peat bogs. Sbor Jihočes Muz v Čes Budějovicích Přír Vědy 24:107–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Palik E (1981) The conditions of increasing menace for the existence of certain Lepidoptera of Poland. Beih Veröff Naturschutz Landschaftspflege Bad-Württ 21:31–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Pax F (1916) Die Tierwelt der deutschen Moore und ihre Gefährdung durch Meliorierungen Beitr. Naturdenkmal 5:236–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Pax F (1921) Die Tierwelt Schlesiens. Verlag von G. Fischer, Jena

    Google Scholar 

  • Pils G (1994) Die Wiesen Oberösterreichs. Forschungsinstitut für Umweltinformatik, Linz

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabitsch W, Essl F (eds) (2009) Endemiten. Kostbarkeiten in Österreichs Pflanzen- und Tierwelt. Naturwissenschaftlicher Verein für Kärnten, Klagenfurt

    Google Scholar 

  • Rejmánek M, Spitzer K (1982) Bionomic strategies and long-term fluctuations in abundance of Noctuidae (Lepidoptera). Acta Entomol Bohemoslov 79:81–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt T (2009) Mediterran, kontinental und arctoalpin: Die drei biogeographischen. Grundmuster Europas und des Mittelmeerraumes am Beispiel von Schmetterlingen. Entomologie heute 21:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Schtickzelle A, Menneche G, Baguette M (2006) Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the Bog Fritillary butterfly. Ecology 87:1057–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Settele J (1998) Metapopulationsanalyse auf Rasterdatenbasis. UFZ, B.G. Teubner, Verlagsgesellschaft, Stuttgart/Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Settele J (2009) Insect conservation. Science 325(5936):41–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Škapec L (ed) (1992) Red book of the endangered and rare species of plants and animals of Czechoslovakia. Vol. 3 (Invertebrates). Priroda, Bratislava (In Czech and Slovak, English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldán T, Papáček M, Novák K, Zelený J (1996) The Šumava Mountains: a unique biocentre of aquatic insects (Ephemeroptera, Odonata, Plecoptera, Megaloptera, Trichoptera and Heteroptera-Nepomorpha). Silva Gabreta 1:179–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Soldán T, Zahrádková S, Helešic J, Dušek L, Landa V (1998) Distributional and quantitative patterns of Ephemeroptera and Plecoptera in the Czech Republic: a possibility of detection of long-term environmental changes of aquatic biotopes. Folia Fac Sci Nat Univ Masarykianae Brunensis, Biologia 98:1–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Southwood TRE (1977) Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies? J Anim Ecol 46:337–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K, Danks HV (2006) Insect biodiversity of boreal peat bogs. Annu Rev Entomol 51:137–161

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K, Jaroš J (2008) Long-term monitoring of moths populations (Lepidoptera) associated with a natural wetland forest: synthesis after 25 years. Terrest Arthropod Rev 1:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer K, Lepš J (1992) Bionomic strategies in Lepidoptera, risk of extinction and nature conservation projects. Nota lepid supplement 4:81–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Clarke RT (2009) Successful conservation of a threatened Maculinea butterfly. Science 325(5936):80–84

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tshikolovets V (2003) Butterflies of Eastern Europe, Urals and Caucasus. Konvoj, Brno/Kyiv

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyck H, Van Strien AJ, Maes D, Van Swaay CAM (2009) Declines in common, widespread butterflies in a landscape under intense human use. Conserv Biol 23:957–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera), vol 99, Nature and environment. Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells SM, Pyle RM, Collins NM (1983) The IUCN invertebrate red data book. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildermuth H, Gonseth Y, Maibach A (2005) Odonata – die Libellen der Schweiz, vol 12, Fauna Helvetica. CSCF/SEG, Neuchatel

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I thank Josef Jaroš for helpful suggestions and field cooperation. Tim New kindly revised the manuscript and improved my English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karel Spitzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spitzer, K. (2012). Insect Conservation Developments in Central Europe. In: New, T. (eds) Insect Conservation: Past, Present and Prospects. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2963-6_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics