Skip to main content

REACH Regulation – A Prerequisite for Health and Environmental Safety: Lithuanian Case

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Environmental and Food Safety and Security for South-East Europe and Ukraine

Abstract

The paper analyses in which way EU REACH regulation is capable to contribute to health and environmental safety in Lithuania. In this respect, the importance of improved knowledge on intrinsic properties of chemical substances, implementation of safety measures, and use of less hazardous substitutes are emphasized. The quantitative assessment of the possible benefits of REACH was carried out for a few occupational diseases – asthma, dermatitis, and cancer. REACH has a good opportunity to remind the necessity of prevention and protection measures. The study on the use and substitution of substances of very high concern showed a low awareness of industry on hazardous chemicals prior to REACH adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahrens A, Bohm E, Heimann K (2003) Guidance for the use of environmentally sound ­substances. Part one. Ökopol, Berlin, p 32

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cherrie JW, Tongeren M, Semple S (2007) Exposure to occupational carcinogens in Great Britain. Ann Occup Hyg 51(8):653–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clapp RW, Jacobs MM, Loechler EL (2008) Environmental and occupational cauces af cancer new evidence 2005–2007. Rev Environ Health 23(1):1–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Doll R, Peto R (1981) The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  5. ECB (2008) European union risk assessment report Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP). European Commission Joint Research Centre, European Chemicals Bureau (ECB). EUR 23384 EN. Luxembourg, p 588

    Google Scholar 

  6. ECHA (2009) Background document for bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP); Document developed in the context of ECHA’s first recommendation for the inclusion of substances in Annex XIV, 1 June 2009. Internet source: http://echa.europa.eu/doc/authorisation/annex_xiv_rec/subs_spec_background_docs/dehp.pdf

  7. ECHA (2010) Review of new available information for bis(2-ethylhexyl)phtalate (DEHP). Evaluation of new scientific evidence concerning the restrictions contained in Annex XVII to regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH). Review report: July 2010. Internet source: http://echa.europa.eu/doc/reach/restrictions/dehp_echa_review_report_2010_6.pdf

  8. Everatt R, Jankauskas R, Kučiauskaitė A (2006) Status of occupational cancer in Lithuania. Int J Occup Environ Health 12:24–27

    Google Scholar 

  9. Martin-Moreno JM, Soerjomataram I, Magnusson G (2008) Cancer causes and prevention: a condensed appraisal in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 44:1390–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morrell S et al (1998) Best estimame of the magnitude of mortality due to occupational ­exposure to hazardous substances. Occup Environ Med 55:634–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Reinhold K, Tint P (2008) Chemical risk assessment in the work environment. Environ Res Eng Manage 4(46):48–55

    Google Scholar 

  12. RPA (2003) Assessment of the impact of the new chemicals policy on occupational health. CEC, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rushton L, Hutchings S, Brown T (2008) The burden of cancer at work: estimation as the first step to prevention. Occup Environ Med 65:789–800

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Teeley P, Bashe Ph (2000) The complete cancer survival guide. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. University of Sheffield (2005) Further assessment of the impact of REACH on occupational health with focus on skin and respiratory diseases. ETUI-REHS

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vainauskas S, Burkauskienė I, Venckienė R, Šimkienė V, Januškevičius V, Vasilavičius P (2010) Work related diseases. Visuomenės sveikata 4(51):17–24, In Lithuanian

    Google Scholar 

  17. Work Health and Safety Sourcebook (2000) In: Kimball CT (ed) Health reference series. Omnigraphics, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jurgis Kazimieras Staniškis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Staniškis, J.K., Kruopiene, J., Dvarioniene, J. (2012). REACH Regulation – A Prerequisite for Health and Environmental Safety: Lithuanian Case. In: Vitale, K. (eds) Environmental and Food Safety and Security for South-East Europe and Ukraine. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series C: Environmental Security. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2953-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics