Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Police and Mediation: Natural, Unimaginable or Both

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Moving Toward a Just Peace

Part of the book series: Clinical Sociology: Research and Practice ((CSRP))

Abstract

Police interventions that are universally recognizable as using mediation have very deep roots in law enforcement. By chance or by choice, police have historically played a role in getting in the middle of disputing parties. They are either called to a scene or come upon it as part of their routine work and find themselves having to assume the intermediary role. Depending on the larger culture in which they are situated, organizational structure within which they operate, and police officers’ own ability to intervene, the police officers have served as mediators. Such intervention has often been undertaken as a natural part of policing with officers intervening intuitively by using their own people and communication skills. As mediation has gained popularity and acceptance, however, police departments around the world are beginning to look more carefully at how officers are trained and how mediation fits into policing. In addition to police officers mediating on the scene, there are other ways in which they can use mediation. For example, they can refer cases to mediation programs or participate in mediation sessions themselves. While policing and mediation may coexist nicely and mediation is an important tool for police, the use of this process in policing has been questioned. Given officers’ ability to use force, authority to take action, and need for public accountability, mediation by police officers in the police context clashes with many of the accepted mediation principles. As a result, critics cannot imagine police officers mediating. Drawing largely from policing in the United States, this chapter examines the use of mediation in the police context, perhaps one of the most complex and controversial settings where mediation occurs, and discusses how police use of mediation can be both natural and unimaginable worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Arbitration Association, the American Bar Association’s Section of Dispute Resolution, and the Association for Conflict Resolution. (2005). The Model Standards of Conduct for Mediators. Retrieved from http://www.abanet.org/dispute/news/ModelStandardsofConductforMediatorsfinal05.pdf

  • Baker, A. (2006, September 20). Settling disputes across a table when officer and citizen clash. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/20/nyregion/20mediation.html?_r=1&scp=3&sq=ccrb%20mediation&st=cse

  • Bartels, E. C., & Silverman, E. B. (2005). An exploratory study of the New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board mediation program. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 28(4), 619–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, V. (2000). Civilians versus police: Mediation can help to bridge the divide. Negotiation Journal, 16(3), 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buerger, M. E., Petrosino, A. J., & Petrosino, C. (1999). Extending the police role: Implications of police mediation as a problem-solving tool. Police Quarterly, 2(2), 125–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadonau, D., & Williams, C. (2007). Policing and mediation: Common ground. Hillsboro Mediation Program Newsletter, 16, 2 [as cited in Meyer, J. F., Paul, R. C., & Grant, D.R. (2009). Peacekeepers turned peacemakers: Police as mediators. Contemporary Justice Review, 12(3), 331–344].

    Google Scholar 

  • Community Policing Consortium. (1994). Understanding community policing: A framework for action. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. Retrieved from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles/commp.pdf

  • Cooper, C. (1997). Patrol police officer conflict resolution processes. Journal of Criminal Justice, 25(2), 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, E. G., & Starek, H. (1978). Police bargaining in Canada: Private sector bargaining, compulsory arbitration, and mediation arbitration in Vancouver. Canadian Police College Journal, 2(1), 133–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folberg, J. (1983). A mediation overview: History and dimensions of practice. Mediation Quarterly, 1(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, E. (2007, July 26). An officer with the gift of the gab: Jack Cambria talks about the skills he needs as a hostage negotiator with the New York Police Department. Times Online. Retrieved from http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/career_and_jobs/graduate_management/article2138151.ece

  • Goldstein, H. (1977). Policing a free society. Cambridge: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, R. P. (2005–2006). Coming together to resolve police misconduct: The emergence of mediation as a new solution. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 21(2), 447–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, D., & Bazemore, G. (2003). Restorative policing, conferencing and community. Police Practice & Research, 4(4), 411–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, C. (2007). Policing and restorative justice. In G. Johnstone & D. Van Ness (Eds.), Handbook of restorative justice (pp. 292–311). Portland: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G., & Van Ness, D. (Eds.). (2007). Handbook of restorative justice. Portland: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerman, L. (1984). Mediation of wife abuse cases: The adverse impact of informal dispute resolution on women. Harvard Women’s Law Journal., 7, 57–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. P. (1999). Mandatory mediation of custody in the face of domestic violence: Suggestions for courts and mediators. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 37(3), 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, B. (2004). Beyond neutrality: Confronting the crisis in conflict resolution. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGillis, D. (1997, July). Community mediation programs: Developments and challenges. US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. NIJ, Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. F., Paul, R. C., & Grant, D. R. (2009). Peacekeepers turned peacemakers: Police as mediators. Contemporary Justice Review, 12(3), 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minnaar, A., & Mistry, D. (2006). Dealing with the use of force and stress-related violence by members of the police: Observations from selected case studies in Gauteng Province. South Africa. Acta Criminologica, 19(3), 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C. W. (2003). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A., & Maxwell, G. (1998). Restorative justice in New Zealand: Family group conferences as a case study. Western Criminology Review, 1(1). [Online] Retrieved from http://wcr.sonoma.edu/v1n1/morris.html

  • Natarajan, M. (2005). Women police stations as a dispute processing system: The Tamil Nadu experience in dealing with dowry-related domestic violence cases. Women & Criminal Justice, 16(1/2), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New measures to combat domestic crime. (2001, January 16). The Jamaica Gleaner. Retrieved from http://www.jamaica-gleaner.com/gleaner/20010116/news/news2.html

  • New York State Unified Court System (NYS UCS). (2011--2012). Community Dispute Resolution Centers Program Statistical Supplement 2011--2012. Retrieved from http://www.nycourts.gov/ip/adr/Publications.shtml#stats

  • Nicholl, C. G. (1999a). Community policing, community justice, and restorative justice. Restorative justice: Exploring the links for the delivery of a balanced approach to public safety. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholl, C. G. (1999b). Toolbox for implementing restorative justice and advancing community policing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, R. W. (2006). Resolving civilian-police complaints in New York City: Reflections on mediation in the real world. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 22(1), 189–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peachey, D. (2003). The Kitchener experiment. In G. Johnstone (Ed.), Restorative justice reader: Texts, sources, contexts (pp. 178–186). Portland: Willlan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pranis, K., Stuart, B., & Wedge, M. (2003). Peacemaking circles: From crime to community. St. Paul: Living Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restorative Justice Online. Retrieved from www.restorativejustice.org/police

  • Sherman, L., & Berk, R. (1984). The specific deterrent effects of arrest for domestic assault. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 261–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, L. W., Schmidt, J. D., & Rogan, D. P. (1992). Policing domestic violence: Experiments and dilemmas. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. H., & Bayley, D. H. (1988). Community policing: Issues and practices around the world. Rockville: US Department of Justice, NIJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Syeed-Miller, N. (2006). Developing appropriate dispute resolution systems for law enforcement and community relations: The Pasadena case study. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 22(1), 83–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thoennes, N., Salem, P., & Pearson, J. (1995). Mediation and domestic violence: Current policies and practices. Family and Conciliation Courts Review, 33(1), 6–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trojanowicz, R., Kappeler, V. E., Gaines, L. K., Bucqueroux, B., & Sluder, R. (1998). Community policing: A contemporary perspective (2nd ed.). OH: Anderson Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M. (2000). Family group conferencing: Implications for crime victims. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbreit, M., & Zehr, H. (1996). Restorative family group conferences: Differing models and guidelines for practice. Federal Probation, 60(3), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Institute of Peace. (2009, May 27–28). CoESPU Workshops on Negotiation and Mediation for Police in Peacekeeping Environments. Retrieved from http://www.usip.org/in-the-field/coespu-workshops-negotiation-and-mediation-police-in-peacekeeping-environments

  • University of Baltimore CNCM Student Info Blog (UBCNCM). Retrieved from http://ubcncm.wordpress.com/2007/12/20/job-opportunities-police-mediation-liaison-two-positions-2/

  • Vincentnathan, L., & Vincentnathan, S. G. (2007). Village courts and the police: Cooperation and conflict in modernizing India. Police Practice and Research, 8(5), 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, M. R. (1989). The police role. In M. Wright & B. Galaway (Eds.), Mediation and criminal justice: Victims, offenders and community (pp. 229–238). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, M. R., & Phillips, N. (2003). Police use of mediation. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 21(2), 263–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpe, M. R., & Phillips, N. (2006). Police mediation: Research survey themes. In N. Phillips & S. Strobl (Eds.), Dispute resolution: Managing conflicts in diverse contexts (pp. 15–26). New York: CUNY Dispute Resolution Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S., Archbold, A., & Herbst, L. (2002). Mediating citizen complaints against police officers: A guide for police and community leaders. Web Version. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J. A., Arunachalam, V., & Callister, R. R. (2008). Third-party dispute resolution in India and the United States. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(12), 3075–3100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dispute Resolution Program, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, City University of New York, New York, USA

    Maria R. Volpe (Professor, Department of Sociology, Director)

Authors
  1. Maria R. Volpe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria R. Volpe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

    Jan Marie Fritz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Volpe, M.R. (2014). Police and Mediation: Natural, Unimaginable or Both. In: Fritz, J. (eds) Moving Toward a Just Peace. Clinical Sociology: Research and Practice. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2885-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation