Skip to main content

Non-thermal Atmospheric Plasma Treatment for Deactivation of Oral Bacteria and Improvement of Dental Composite Restoration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

This paper reviews our recent research results of using non-thermal ­atmospheric plasmas for oral bacterial deactivation and for composite restoration improvement. Oral bacteria of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) and Lactobacillus acidophilus (L. acidophilus) with an initial bacterial population density between 1.0 × 108 and 5.0 × 108 cfu/ml were seeded on various media and their survivability with plasma exposure was examined. The plasma exposure time for a 99.9999% cell reduction was less than 15 s for S. mutans and within 5 min for L. acidophilus. To evaluate the dentin/composite interfacial bonding, extracted unerupted human third molars were used by removing the crowns and etching the exposed dentin surfaces with 35% phosphoric acid gel. After dental composite application and light curing, the teeth were then sectioned into micro-bars as the specimens for microtensile test. Student Newman Keuls (SNK) tests showed that the bonding strength of the composite restoration to peripheral dentin was significantly increased (by 64%) after 30 s plasma treatment of the dentin surfaces. These findings indicated that non-thermal atmospheric plasma technology is very promising for dental clinical applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. York AK, Arthur JS (1993) Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps. Oper Dent 18:203–208

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mjor IA (1997) The reasons for replacement and the age of failed restorations in general dental practice. Acta Odontol Scand 55:58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Forss H, Widstrom E (2001) From amalgamto composite: selection of restorative materials and restoration longevity in Finland. Acta Odontol Scand 59:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lutz FU, Krejci I, Oddera M (1996) Advanced adhesive restorations: the post-amalgam age. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 8:385–394

    Google Scholar 

  5. Collins CJ, Bryant RW, Hodge KLV (1998) A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. J Dent 26:311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Letzel H (1989) Survival rates and reasons for failure of posterior composite restorations in multicentre clinical trial. J Dent 17:S10–S17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR (1993) Saucer-shaped cavity preparation for composite resin restorations in class II carious lesions: three-year results. J Prosthet Dent 69:155–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nordbo H, Leirskar J, von der Fehr FR (1998) Saucer-shaped cavity preparations for posterior approximal resin composite restorations: observations up to 10 years. Quintessence Int 29:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Spencer P (2005) Interfacial chemistry of class II composite restoration: structure analysis. J Biomed Mater Res 75A:580–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hannig M, Friedrichs C (2001) Comparative in vivo and in vitro investigation of interfacial bond variability. Oper Dent 26:3–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson CL, DeGee AJ, Feilzer A (1984) The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress. J Dent Res 63:1396–1399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wilson NHF, Burke FJT, Mjor IA (1997) Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations of direct restorative materials by a selected group of practitioners in the United Kingdom. Quintessence Int 28:245–248

    Google Scholar 

  13. Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Schalz G (1995) Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent 20:34–38

    Google Scholar 

  14. Griffiths BM, Naasan M, Sherriff M, Watson TF (1999) Variable polymerisation shrinkage and the interfacial micropermeability of a dentin bonding system. J Adhes Dent 1:119–131

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hilton TJ (2002) Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 1. Am J Dent 15:198–210

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brannstrom M (1984) Communication between the oral cavity and the dental pulp associated with restorative treatment. Oper Dent 9:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  17. Amaral CM, de Castro AKBB, Pimenta LAF, Ambrosano GMB (2002) Influence of resin composite polymerization techniques on microleakage and microhardness. Quintessence Int 33:685–689

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tam LE, Pilliar RM (1994) Effects of dentin surface treatments on the fracture toughness and tensile bond strength of a dentin-composite adhesive interface. J Dent Res 73:1530–1538

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hashimoto M, Ohno H, Kaga M, Endo K, Sano H, Oguchi H (2000) In vivo degradation of resin-dentin bonds in humans over 1 to 3 years. J Dent Res 79:1385–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Swift EJ Jr (2003) Dentin bonding. J Esthet Restor Dent 15:71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Burrow MF, Satoh M, Tagami J (1996) Dentin durability after three years using a dentin ­bonding agent with and without priming. Dent Mater 12:302–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duan YX, Huang C, Yu QS (2005) Low-temperature direct current glow discharges at ­atmospheric pressure. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 33:328–329

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu QS, Huang C, Hsieh F, Huff HE, Duan YX (2007) Bacterial inactivation using a low-­temperature atmospheric plasma brush sustained with argon gas. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 80:211–219

    Google Scholar 

  24. Loesche WJ (1982) Dental caries, a treatable infection. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield. ISBN 0-3980-4767-7

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schaeken MJM, Van Der Hoeven JS, Franken HCM (1986) Comparative recovery of Streptococcus mutans on five isolation media, including a new simple selective medium. J Dent Res 65:906–908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Keene HJ (1986) Sampling of cariogenic microorganism in human populations. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1:7–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jay P (1938) Lactobacillus acidophilus and dental caries. Am J Public Health 28:759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ljungh A, Wadstrom T (eds) (2009) Lactobacillus molecular biology: from genomics to ­probiotics. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk. ISBN 978-1-904455-41-7

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goree J, Bin L, David D, Stoffels E (2006) Killing of S.mutans bacteria using a plasma needle at atmospheric pressure. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 34:1317–1324

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang B, Chen JR, Yu QS, Li H, Lin MS, Mustapha A, Hong L, Wang Y (2011) Oral bacterial deactivation using a low-temperature atmospheric argon plasma brush. J Dent 39:48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang Y, Spencer P, Yao X (2006) Micro-Raman imaging analysis of monomer/mineral ­distribution in intertubular region of adhesive/dentin interfaces. J Biomed Opt 11:024005-1–024005-7

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pashley DH, Sanoz H, Ciucchis B, Yoshiyamad M, Carvalhos RM (1995) Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 11:117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ritts AC, Li H, Yu QS, Xu C, Yao X, Hong L, Wang Y (2010) Dentin surface treatment using a non-thermal argon plasma brush for interfacial bonding improvement in composite restoration. Eur J Oral Sci 118:510–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Brock TD (1998) Biology of microorganisms, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. ISBN 0-1307-6829-4

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H (1994) Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater 10:236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work was supported in part by US National Science Foundation (NSF) under contract of NSF-CBET-0730505 and US National Institute of Health (NIH) with grant numbers of 1R43DE019041-01 and 2R44DE019041-02.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qing Song Yu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, Q.S. et al. (2012). Non-thermal Atmospheric Plasma Treatment for Deactivation of Oral Bacteria and Improvement of Dental Composite Restoration. In: Machala, Z., Hensel, K., Akishev, Y. (eds) Plasma for Bio-Decontamination, Medicine and Food Security. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2852-3_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics