Abstract
Although literature on economic classroom experiments is growing fast we have found a total of only three studies that measure the effectiveness of the method in a control group design where undergraduates have been taught by experiments through the semester. We have therefore conducted a similar study with two “microeconomics II” courses of the years 2007 and 2008 (N = 161) at the University of Siegen in Germany. Students were divided in two groups. The “experiments” group was taught by playing games. The control group was taught traditionally by lectures. Applying a series of three tests we can show an advantage of the experimental method in the procedural domain and in the tests that have taken place at an earlier time during the semester. In the declarative domain and at a later stage in the semester the “lectures” group outperforms the experimental group. As a consequence we recommend a blended learning environment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Since we plan to use the test questions again for a similar study, we have not added the test questionnaires.
- 2.
There was a big incentive for students to bid for a chocolate bar for it was lunchtime and they were allowed to eat the bar during the test session.
- 3.
This implies that each class has got a different demand curve.
- 4.
We would have liked to use the students’ cumulative grade point averages (GPA) or the scores on the American College Test (ACT) but there simply is nothing comparable in Germany to which we could have linked our students’ performance.
- 5.
- 6.
The EAP/PV-estimators were linearly transformed to a distribution that—in order to ensure comparability—has the same mean as the average of the means of the other models.
References
Adams, R., & Wu, M. L. (Eds.). (2003). PISA 2000. Technical report. Paris: OECD.
Anderson, J. (2007). Kognitive psychologie. Berlin: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag.
Becker, W. E. (1997). Teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 1347–1373.
Bergstrom, T., & Miller, J. (2000). Experiments with economic principles. New York: Princeton.
Brauer, J., & Delemeester, G. (2001). Games economists play: A survey of non-computerized classroom-games for college economics. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 221–236.
Cardell, N. S., Fort, R., Joerding, W., Inaba, F., Lamoreaux, D., Rosenman, R., Stromsdorfer, E., & Barlett, R. (1996). Laboratory-based experimental and demonstration initiatives in teaching undergraduate economics. American Economic Review, 86(2), 454–459.
Chamberlin, E. (1948). An experimental imperfect market. Journal of Political Economy, 56, 95–108.
Davier, M. von, & Carstensen, C. (Eds.). (2006). Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. Extensions and application. Berlin: Springer.
Dickie, M. (2006). Do classroom experiments increase learning in introductory microeconomics? Journal of Economic Education, 37(3), 267–288.
Emerson, T. L. N., & Taylor, B. A. (2004). Comparing student achievment across experimental and lecture-oriented sections of a principles of microeconomics course. Southern Economic Journal, 70(3), 672–693
Fischer, G., & Molenaar, I. (1995). Rasch models. Foundations, recent developments, and applications. New York: Springer.
Frank, B. (1997). The impact of classroom experiments on the learning of economics: An empirical investigation. Economic Inquiry, 35, 763–769.
Gemmen, H., & Potters, J. (1997). Assessing the efficacy of gaming in economic education. The Journal of Economic Education, 28, 291–303.
Gerrig, R. J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2008). Psychologie. München: Pearson Studium.
Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161.
Holt, C. (2006). Webgames and strategy: Recipes for interactive learning. New York: Addison-Wesley.
Holt, C., & Davis, D. (1993). Experimental economics. USA: Princeton.
Kagel, J. H., & Roth, A. E. (1997). The handbook of experimental economics. USA: Princeton.
Kugler, P. (1988). Lohndiskriminierung in der Schweiz: Evidenz von Mikrodaten. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Volkswirtschaft und Statistik, 124(1), 23–47.
Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56, 177–196.
Mislevy, R. J., Beaton, A. E., Kaplan, B., & Sheehan, K. M. (1992). Estimating population characteristics from sparse matrix samples of item responses. Journal of Educational Measurement, 29, 133–161.
Pollock, J. (1986). Contemporary theories of knowledge. New Jersey: Rowman.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Danish Institute for Educational Research, Copenhagen 1960, expanded edition with foreword and afterword by B. D. Wright, Chicago.
Reimers, C. W. (1983). Labour market discrimination against Hispanic and Black men. Review of Economics and Statistics, 65, 570–579.
Rost, J. (2003). Testtheorie—Testkonstruktion. Göttingen: Huber Hans.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson & Company.
Saunders, P. (1991). Test of understanding in college economics third edition: Examiner’s manual. New York: Joint Council on Economic Education (Now, National Council on Economic Education).
Schlösser, H. J., Schuhen, M., Schäfer, A. T., Niederschlag, S., & Macha, K. (2009). Economic experiments. Berlin (in German language).
Smith, V. (1962). An experimental study of competitive market behaviour. Journal of Political Economy, 70, 111–137.
Smits, J. (2003). Estimating the Heckman two-step procedure to control for selection bias with SPSS. Nijmegen: Radboud University. http://home.planet.nl/~smits.jeroen/selbias/Heckman-SPSS.doc Accessed 27 May 2010.
Tücke, M. (2004). Grundlagen der Psychologie für (zukünftige) Lehrer. Osnabrücker Schriften zur Psychologie (Vol. 8.2). Münster.
Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Haldane, S. A. (2007a). ACER ConQuest version 2.0.
Wu, M. L., Adams, R. J., Wilson, M. R., & Haldane, S. A. (2007b). ACER ConQuest Manual.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ebbers, I., Macha, K., Schlösser, HJ., Schuhen, M. (2012). On the Effectiveness of Economic Experiments as a Method of Teaching Undergraduates. In: Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Milter, R. (eds) Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice. Advances in Business Education and Training, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2845-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2846-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)