Skip to main content

The Use of Personal Development Plans (PDPs) in Organizations and the Role of Its Perceived Purpose

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice

Part of the book series: Advances in Business Education and Training ((ABET,volume 4))

  • 1513 Accesses

Abstract

In today’s fast changing knowledge economy, organizations are forced to give priority to strategic human resource development to gain and maintain a competitive advantage (Guthridge et al., The McKinsey Quarterly 1:49–59, 2008). Therefore, tools such as Personal Development Plans (PDPs) are increasingly implemented. This assessment tool is used for various purposes, ranging from evaluative purposes to developmental purposes (Smith and Tillema, Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 45:183–202, 2001). Although the power of a PDP lies in stimulating learning and professional development of employees, it can be questioned if implementing PDP with evaluative purposes does not jeopardize its developmental power. In this study, we focus on the influence of the nature of the PDP’s perceived purpose on its practice and on the employee’s performance. In addition, the mediating role of the PDP practice between perceived purpose and performance was researched. It was found that perceiving the PDP as a tool that aims at learning and development is related to a better performance, in contrast to perceiving it as a tool for certification or selection. In addition, the PDP practice components effort quality and feedback quality mediated the relation between the perceived developmental purposes and the employee’s performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arter, J., & Spandel, V. (1991). Using portfolios of student work in instruction and assessment. Portland: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Reform Group. (1999). Position paper on assessment for learning. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Assessment for Learning. Dunedin, New Zealand, March 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, Z., Marini, A., & Desroches, B. (2005). Use of a learning portfolio for continuous professional development: A study of pharmacists in Ontario (Canada). Pharmacy Education, 5, 175–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beausaert, S., Segers, M., van der Rijt, J., & Gijselaers, W. (2011). The use of personal development plans in the workplace: A literature review. In P. van den Bossche, W. Gijselaers, & R. Milter (Eds.), Building learning experiences in a changing world: Advances in business education and training III. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beausaert, S., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2011). The personal development Plan Practice Questionnaire (PPQ): The development and validation of an instrument to assess employees’ perception of the personal development plan practice. International Journal of Training and Development, 15 (4), 249–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, R. J., Livne, N. L., & Bear, S. L. (2005). Teachers’ self-assessment of the effects of formative and summative electronic portfolios on professional development. European Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berliner, D. C. (1984). The half-full glass: A review of research on teaching. In P. L. Hosford (Ed.), Using what we know about teaching. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P. J., & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5, 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. (1995). Portfolio development and profiling for nurses (2nd ed.). Lancaster: Quay.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunker, A., & Leggett, M. (2004). Being wise about teaching portfolios: Exploring the barriers to their development and maintenance. http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/conference/2004/PDF/P047-jt.pdf. Accessed 20 Sep 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 47 (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching & Teacher Education, 16, 523–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dochy, F., & McDowell, L. (1997). Assessment as a tool for learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 23, 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, E. W., van Tartwijk, J., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., & Wass, V. J. (2007). Portfolios in medical education: Why do they meet with mixed success? A systematic review. Medical Education, 41, 1224–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, A., Shahid, A., Singleton, C., Nolan, P., & Bahrami, J. (2002). The effectiveness of personal education plans in CPD: An evaluation. Medical Teacher, 24(1), 79–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G. (1999). Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn. In S. Brown & A. Glasner (Eds.), Assessment matters in higher education. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1, 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, G., Simpson, C., & Macdonald, R. (2003). Improving student learning through changing assessment—a conceptual and practical framework. Paper Presented at the European Association for Research into Learning and Instruction Conference, Aug 2003. Padova, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guthridge, M., Komm, A. B., & Lawson, E. (2008). Making talent a strategic priority. The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambleton, R. K. (1994). Guidelines for adapting educational and psychological tests: A progress report. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 10, 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In Gilbert, D., Fiske, S., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 1, 4th ed., pp. 233–265). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, M., & Smither, J. W. (1999). Empowered self-development and continuous learning. Human Resource Management, 38(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, M., & Smither, J. W. (2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12(1), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, N., & Evans, L. (1997). Portfolio: A tool for self-directed learning at work. Paper presented at the Self-directed Learning: Past and Future Symposium, Sept 1997. Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullan, M., Endacott, R., Gray, M. A., Jasper, M., Miller, C. M. L., Scholes, J., & Webb, C. (2003). Portfolios and assessment of competence: A review of the literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Z., & Bond, N. (2002). The use of portfolios for in-service teacher assessment: A case study of foreign language middle-school teachers in Texas. Foreign Language Annals, 35(1), 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osland, J. S., Kolb, D. A., Rubin, I. M., & Turner, M. E. (Eds.). (2007). Individual and organizational learning. In Organization behavior. An experiential approach. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrenoud, P. (1998). From formative evaluation to a controlled regulation of learning processes. Towards a wider conceptual field. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5, 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, K. D. (1995). Teacher evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: The experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd Ed.). London: RoutledgeFalmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, W. (1994). Portfolios for development: A guide for trainers and managers. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Thurlings, M. (2008). The relationship between students’ perceptions of portfolio assessment practice and their approaches to learning. Educational Studies, 34(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seng, S. H., & Seng, T. O. (1996). Reflective teaching and the portfolio approach in early childhood staff development. Paper presented at the Joint Conference of the Educational Research Association of Singapore and the Australian Association for Research in Education, Nov 1996. Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sluijsmans, D. M. A. (2002). Student involvement in assessment. The training of peer assessment skills. Unpublished PhD thesis, Open University of The Netherlands, Heerlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (1998). Evaluating portfolio use as a learning tool for professionals. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 42, 193–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2001). Long-term influences of portfolios on professional development. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2003). Clarifying different types of portfolio use. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 28, 625–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., & Tillema, H. (2007). Use of criteria in assessing teaching portfolios; judgmental practices in summative evaluation. Scandinavian Journal for Educational Research, 51(1), 101–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snadden, D., Thomas M. L., Griffin, E. M., & Hudson, H. (1996). Portfolio-based learning and general practice vocational training. Medical Education, 30, 148–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, J., Pippincott, A., & Bower, D. (1998). The inherent tensions in the multiple use of portfolios in teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 25(1), 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In: S. Leinhart (Ed.), Social methodology 1982 (290–312). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, I., Thomas, J., & Sage, H. (1999). Portfolios for learning and assessment: Laying the foundations for continuing professional development. Social Work Education, 18, 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (1998). Design and validity of a portfolio instrument for professional training. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 24, 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tillema, H. H. (2001). Portfolios as developmental assessment tools. International Journal of Training and Development, 5(2), 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. C., & Yarbrough, D. B. (1996). Portfolios: A tool for reflective thinking in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12(1), 63–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildy, H., & Wallace, J. (1998). Professionalism, portfolios and the development of school leaders.School Leadership and Management, 18 (1), 123–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, T. J. et al. (2002). The use of portfolios for assessment of the competence and performance of doctors in practice. Medical Education, 36, 918–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsor, P., Butt, R. L., & Reeves, H. (1999). Portraying professional development in pre-service teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 5(1), 59–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K., & Dietz, M. (1998). Teaching portfolios: Purposes and possibilities. Teacher Educational Quarterly, 25 (1), 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, W. A., Knight, P. T., & Pomerleau, N. (1999). Portfolio people: Teaching and learning dossiers and the future of higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 24(2), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, J. (1996). The relationship between organizational factors and the transfer of training in the electronics industry in Shenzhen, China. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeichner, K., & Wray, S. (2001). The teaching portfolio in US teacher education programs: What we know and what we need to know. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 613–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nina Ketels .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ketels, N., Beausaert, S., Segers, M. (2012). The Use of Personal Development Plans (PDPs) in Organizations and the Role of Its Perceived Purpose. In: Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Milter, R. (eds) Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice. Advances in Business Education and Training, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics