Abstract
An increasing number of researchers have found that business teachers need to redesign their education and teaching in order to facilitate a new generation of business students. At the same time, several powerful tools such as online assessments or virtual classroom tools are currently available for business teachers to enrich the learning experience of their students. A thoughtful (re-) design of online and blended learning activities is critical for the attainment of rich learning and hands-on experiences for our future business managers. In order to provide a rich learning experience for a new generation of business students, it is important that content, technology and pedagogy are equally balanced.
The main purpose of this chapter is to review the state-of-the-art research on integrating ICT in business education using the conceptual technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) model of Mishra and Koehler (Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152, 2005; Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054, 2006). By using principles of design-based research (DBR), two redesigns in business education using ICT will be discussed, each using a distinct combination of cognition, pedagogy and technology. Both cases indicate that a successful redesign of business education can be achieved when teachers have a thorough understanding of pedagogy, content and technology.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adcroft, A., Teckman, J., & Willis, J. (2010). Is higher education in the UK becoming more competitive? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23(6), 578–588.
Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.
Arts, J. A., Gijselaers, W. H., & Boshuizen, H. (2006). Understanding managerial problem-solving, knowledge use and information processing: Investigating stages from school to the workplace. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(4), 387–410.
Belei, N., Noteborn, G., & De Ruyter, K. (2009). Cross-world branding—One world is not enough. In C. Wankel & J. Kingsley (Eds.), Higher education in virtual worlds: Teaching and learning in second life (pp. 115–140). United Kingdom: Emerald Group Publishing.
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Lou, Y., Borokhovski, E., Wade, A., Wozney, L., et al. (2004). How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 379–439.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at University (3rd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Bohle Carbonell, K., Rienties, B., & Van den Bossche, P. (2011). Transactive memory profiles and their influence on advice seeking. In P. Van den Bossche, W. H. Gijselaers, & R. G. Milter (Eds.), Building learning experiences in a changing world (Vol. 3, pp. 267–283). The Netherlands: Springer.
Bok, D. C. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Brouwer, N., Ekimova, L., Jasinska, M., Van Gastel, L., & Virgailaite-Meckauskaite, E. (2009). Enhancing mathematics by online assessments, two cases of remedial education considered. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 277–284.
Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15–42.
D’abate, C. P. (2010). Developmental interactions for business students: Do they make a difference. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 17(2), 143–155.
De Laat, M., Lally, V., Lipponen, L., & Simons, R.-J. (2007). Online teaching in networked learning communities: A multi-method approach to studying the role of the teacher. Instructional Science, 35(3), 257–286.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Gijbels, D. (2003). Effects of problem-based learning: A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 533–568.
Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Tempelaar, D. T. (2009). Social presence, web-videoconferencing and learning in virtual teams. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 301–310.
Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., & Deci, E. L. (2010). Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or structure but autonomy support and structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600.
Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., & Veermans, M. (2008). Understanding the dynamics of motivation in socially shared learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 47(2), 122–135.
Kahn, B. (2005). Managing e-Learning strategies: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Hershey: Idea Group.
Kelly, A. (2004). Design research in education: Yes, but is it methodological? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 115–128.
Kirschner, P. A., Beers, P., Boshuizen, H., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Coercing shared knowledge in collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 403–420.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94–102.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2010). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). http://tpack.org/. Accessed 26 Jan 2011.
Lou, Y., Bernard, R., & Abrami, P. (2006). Media and pedagogy in undergraduate distance education: A theory-based meta-analysis of empirical literature. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 141–176.
Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35(2), 141–185.
Mazzolini, M., & Maddison, S. (2003). Sage, guide or ghost? The effect of instructor intervention on student participation in online discussion forums. Computers & Education, 40(3), 237–253.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2010). TPACK model. http://tpack.org. Accessed 17 Jan 2012.
Nicholls, G. (2001). Developing teaching and learning in higher education. London: Routledge.
Pence, C., & Wulf, C. (2009). Innovation in cross border learning. In P. Daly & D. Gijbels (Eds.), Real learning opportunities at business school and beyond (pp. 195–209). Dordrecht: Springer.
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96–115.
Rienties, B., & Tempelaar, D. T. (2009). Mobility of lifelong learners and IT: Introduction to special issue. Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 265–268.
Rienties, B., & Woltjer, G. (2004). Regular online assessment, motivation and learning . Discussion paper, Maastricht Research School of Economics of Technology and Organization.http://edocs.ub.unimaas.nl/loader/file.asp?id=914. Accessed 17 Jan 2012
Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., Dijkstra, J., Rehm, M., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2008). Longitudinal study of online remedial education effects. In N. P. Barsky, M. Clements, J. Ravn, & K. Smith (Eds.), Advances in business education and training 1: The power of technology for learning (pp. 43–59). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D. T., Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., & Segers, M. (2009). The role of academic motivation in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(6), 1195–1206.
Rienties, B., Kaper, W., Struyven, K., Tempelaar, D. T., Van Gastel, L., Vrancken, S., et al. (2011). A review of the role of Information Communication Technology and course design in transitional education practices. Interactive Learning Environments. doi: 10.1080/10494820.2010.542757.
Schmidt, H. G., Van Der Molen, H. T., Te Winkel, W. W. R., & Wijnen, W. H. F. W. (2009). Constructivist, problem-based learning does work: A meta-analysis of curricular comparisons involving a single medical school. Educational Psychologist, 44(4), 227–249.
Segers, M., Van den Bossche, P., & Teunissen, E. (2003). Evaluating the effects of redesigning a problem-based learning environment. Studies In Educational Evaluation, 29, 315–334.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., & Giesbers, B. (2009). Who profits most from blended learning? Industry and Higher Education, 23(4), 285–292.
Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2006). Information and communication technologies in higher education: Evidence-based practices in medical education. Medical Teacher, 28(1), 40–48.
Valcke, M., & Martens, R. (2006). The problem arena of researching computer supported collaborative learning: Introduction to the special section. Computers & Education, 46(1), 1–5.
Van den Bossche, P., Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Dochy, F. (2004). Effects of problem-based learning in business education: A comparison between a PBL and a conventional educational approach. In R. Ottewill, L. Borredon, L. Falque, B. Macfarlane, & A. Wall (Eds.), Educational innovation in economics and business VIII: Pedagogy, technology and innovation (pp. 205–228). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Team learning beliefs & behaviour. Small Group Research, 37, 490–521.
Van der Wende, M. C. (2003). Globalisation and access to higher education. Journal of Studies in International Education, 7(2), 193–206.
Volman, M. (2005). A variety of roles for a new type of teacher: Educational technology and the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(1), 15–31.
Vonderwell, S. (2003). An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: A case study. The Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), 77–90.
Wang, Q. (2009). Designing a web-based constructivist learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(1), 1–13.
Woltjer, G. (2004). Crude oil: Using a large case to teach introductory economics. Meteor Research Memorandum, 4(14).
Acknowledgements
This chapter was written in the context of the MARCHet project (http://www.marchet.nl) that is funded by the SURF Foundation as well as the UM e-teacher project funded by Maastricht University. We would like to acknowledge Erwin Faasse, Peter Dekker, Gwen Noteborn, Katerina Bohle Carbonell, Janneke van der Loo, Anne-Petra Rozendal and Natasa Brouwer for their input and reflections on earlier drafts of this chapter. In addition, we would like to thank the audience of S-ICT 2009 in Amsterdam and EDINEB 2010 in London for their suggestions for further improvement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rienties, B., Townsend, D. (2012). Integrating ICT in Business Education: Using TPACK to Reflect on Two Course Redesigns. In: Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W., Milter, R. (eds) Learning at the Crossroads of Theory and Practice. Advances in Business Education and Training, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2846-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2845-5
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2846-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)