Skip to main content

Tentative Conclusions in Two Steps

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
System Theory in Geomorphology

Part of the book series: Springer Theses ((Springer Theses))

  • 862 Accesses

Abstract

The newer system theories from physics, biology, and also from sociology can be summarized under the generic term “second order systems theories”, as all of them have been developed within the paradigm of self-organisation. Still, they are different: They start from different basic assumptions and, most of all, are concerned with completely different research objects. For example, one focuses on biological systems, whilst the others deal with thermodynamic or social systems. Importantly, this does not imply that second order systems theories are contradictory. Consequently, if geomorphology adopted some thoughts and approaches from biological and physical systems theory, no new logical inconsistencies or contradictions should arise. If biological second order systems theory is compared to the theory of dissipative structures it comes as a surprise that, despite the completely different approaches and chosen routes of theory development, there is much common ground.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Strictly speaking, determination means complete determination of the future state (also cf. Sect. 8.3, where the term is explained in connection with causality). Maturana as well as probably Prigogine, however, rather use the term ‘structurally determined’ in a rhetorical manner in order to stress and illustrate the importance of different influencing factors (also cf. [4]).

References

  1. Bühl WL (1987) Grenzen der Autopoiesis. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 39:225–254

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roth G (1986) Selbstorganisation–Selbsterhaltung–Selbstreferentialität. In: Dress A, Henrichs H, Küppers G (ed.) Selbstorganisation. Die Entstehung von Ordnung in Natur und Gesellschaft. Piper, München, Zürich p 149–180

    Google Scholar 

  3. Maturana HR (1980) Autopoiesis: reproduction, heredity and evolution. In: Zeleny M (ed) Autopoiesis, dissipative structures and spontaneous social orders, Boulder, pp 45–79

    Google Scholar 

  4. Allefeld C (1999) Erkenntnistheoretische Konsequenzen der Systemtheorie. Die Theorie selbstreferentieller Systeme und der Konstruktivismus. Master Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, p 85

    Google Scholar 

  5. Simon FB (1997) Autopoiese, strukturelle Kopplung und Therapie–Fragen an Francisco Varela. In: Simon FB (ed) Lebende Systeme: Wirklichkeitskonstruktionen in der systemischen Therapie. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, pp 148–164

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fuchs P (1992) Niklas Luhmann–beobachtet. Eine Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Westdeutscher Verlag, Opladen, p 219

    Google Scholar 

  7. Strahler AN (1952) Dynamic basis of geomorphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 63:923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chorley RJ (1962) Geomorphology and general systems theory. Geological Survey professional paper. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jantsch E (1979) Die Selbstorganisation des Universums. Vom Urknall zum menschlichen Geist. Hanser Verlag, Darmstadt, p 464

    Google Scholar 

  10. Spencer-Brown G (1997) Laws of form. Gesetze der Form. Bohmeier Verlag, Lübeck, p 200

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hard G (1973) Zur Methodologie und Zukunft der Physischen Geographien an Hochschule und Schule. Möglichkeiten physisch-geographischer Forschungsperspektiven. Geographische Zeitschrift (61): 5–35 (hier aus: Hard G (2003) Dimensionen geographischen Denkens. Aufsätze zur Theorie der Geograpie, Bd. 2, Osnabrück, S. 87–111)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Egner H (2008) Komplexität. Zwischen Emergenz und Reduktion. In: Egner H, Ratter BMW, Dikau R (eds) Umwelt als System–System als Umwelt? Systemtheorien auf dem Prüfstand. oekom, München, pp 39–54

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

von Elverfeldt, K. (2012). Tentative Conclusions in Two Steps. In: System Theory in Geomorphology. Springer Theses. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2822-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics