Skip to main content

Exploring Scholastic Mortality Among Working-Class and Indigenous Students

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Equity in Discourse for Mathematics Education

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education Library ((MELI,volume 55))

Abstract

Using Bourdieu’s theoretical framework, it becomes possible to theorise the ways in which school mathematics operates to create a form of symbolic violence for those students who do not speak the dominant discourse of mathematics. By providing a number of examples, the chapter explores the nuances of school mathematics discourse and how it operates to exclude students from participating in the discursive interactions that make up the teaching practices, and how this ultimately limits access to the field. In so doing, the myth of ability prevails so that those who enter the field with the forms of culture recognised and validated within the field are more likely to be constructed as effective learners of school mathematics

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The term ‘Indigenous’ is used in this chapter to refer to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People. It is recognised that the term is problematic, as it fails to acknowledge the great diversity among the first nation peoples of Australia. It is used here as a marker to highlight the diversity of the original inhabitants of Australia.

  2. 2.

    In this study, Year 6 was the final year in primary school in the state in which the study was conducted. Typically, students were about 12 years old and had experienced 7 years of formal schooling. This is common in most Australian states, except for Queensland and Western Australia where a different numbering system is used and the final year of primary school is Year 7.

References

  • Baturo, A., Norton, S., & Cooper, T. (2004). The mathematics of indigenous card games: Implications for mathematics teaching and learning. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millennium: Towards 2010 (Proceedings of the 27th annual MERGA conference) (pp. 87–94). Sydney: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1982). Codes, modalities and the process of cultural reproduction: A model. In M. Apple (Ed.), Cultural and economic reproduction in education (pp. 304–355). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (1997). Experiencing school mathematics: Teaching styles, sex and setting. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting “relational equity” and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J., & de Saint Martin, M. (1994a). Academic discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J., & de saint Martin, M. (1994b). Students and the language of teaching. In P. Bourdieu, J. Passeron, & M. de saint Martin (Eds.), Academic discourse: Linguistic misunderstanding and professorial power (pp. 35–79). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (1999). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex and problem solving. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, P. (1991). A touch of class: ability, social class and intertext in SMP 11-16. In D. Pimm & E. Love (Eds.), Teaching and learning school mathematics (pp. 137–152). London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ezeife, A. (2002). Mathematics and culture nexus: The interactions of culture and mathematics in an aboriginal classroom. International Education Journal, 3(3), 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freebody, P., Ludwig, C., & Gunn, S. (1995). Everyday literacy practice in and out of schools in low socioeconomic urban communities. Brisbane: Griffith University, Centre for Literacy Education Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (1999). Literacy, numeracy, attendance and health. Unicorn, 25(3), 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez, R. (1998). Departments as contexts for understanding and reforming secondary teachers’ work: Continuing the dialogue. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(1), 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. (1991). Mathematics in a cultural context: Aboriginal perspectives on space, time and money. Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. (1982). Questioning at home and at school: A comparative study. In G. Spindler (Ed.), Doing the ethnography of schooling (pp. 102–131). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, S. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life and work in communities and classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • HREOC. (2000). Emerging themes: National inquiry into rural and remote education. Sydney: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, G. (1991). The crest of the peacock: Non-European roots of mathematics. London: Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Rocha, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 67–94). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, J. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGaw, B. (2004). Australian mathematics learning in an international context. In I. Putt, R. Faragher, & M. McLean (Eds.), Mathematics education for the third millennium: Towards 2010 (Proceedings of the 27th annual MERGA conference) (pp. 639–663). Sydney: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siemon, D. (2008). Developing the “Big” ideas in mathematics. (http://www.decs.sa.gov.au/learninginclusion/files/pages/Expo/Siemen/Devt_Big_Ideas_in_Mathemat.pdf)

  • Sinclair, J., & Coulthard, M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V., & Lucey, H. (1989). Democracy in the kitchen: Regulating mothers and socialising daughters. London: Virago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, H. (1987). Learning to apply numbers to nature. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(4), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, H., & Chambers, D. (1989). Singing the land, signing the land: A portfolio of exhibits. Geelong: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, S. (2000). Strengthening numeracy: Reducing risk. In M. Meiers (Ed.), Proceedings of the improving numeracy learning research conference 2000. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R. (1995). The construction of social difference in mathematics education. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Deakin University, Geelong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R. (2000). “Cracking the code” of mathematics classrooms: School success as a function of linguistic, social, and cultural background. In J. Boaler (Ed.), Multiple perspectives on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 201–223). Westport: Ablex Publishing Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R. (2001a). Mathematical literacy in the middle years. Literacy in the Middle Years, 9(2), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R. (2001b). Mathematics, social class, and linguistic capital: An analysis of mathematics classroom interactions. In B. Atweh, H. Forgasz, & B. Nebres (Eds.), Sociocultural research on mathematics education: An international perspective (pp. 201–215). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R., & Lerman, S. (2001). Communicative competence in school mathematics: On being able to do school mathematics. In J. Bobis, B. Perry, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Numeracy and beyond (Proceedings of the 24th Annual MERGA Conference of the Australasia) (Vol. 2, pp. 571–578). Sydney: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zevenbergen, R., Mousley, J., & Sullivan, P. (2004). Making the pedagogic relay inclusive for indigenous Australian students in mathematics classrooms. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8(4), 391–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robyn Jorgensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jorgensen, R. (2012). Exploring Scholastic Mortality Among Working-Class and Indigenous Students. In: Herbel-Eisenmann, B., Choppin, J., Wagner, D., Pimm, D. (eds) Equity in Discourse for Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Library, vol 55. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2813-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics