Abstract
This chapter provides an analysis of Environmental Impact Assessment follow-up in India. It argues that its use and particularly the application of its monitoring-evaluation-management component show a consistent decline. The chapter also argues that the judiciary is one of the key drivers of EIA follow-up in the country, apart from the regulatory agency and the community. The chapter identifies the instrumental role of environmental clearance in India, the market-friendly macro-political environment and the lack of institutional strengthening of regulatory institutions as the major causes of this decline.
Let us all accept the reality that there is undoubtedly a trade-off between growth and environment. In arriving at decisions to untangle the trade-off, three options present themselves – ‘yes’, ‘yes but’ and ‘no’. …The ‘but’ often takes the form of conditions that must be adhered to before, during the construction, and after the launch of the project. I believe that in laying down these conditions, we must strive for three things: First, the conditions must be objective and measurable, so that it is clear what is to be done and whether it has been complied with…
(Jairam Ramesh, Ex-Environment and Forest Minister, India (2010, p. 3)).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
To date, India has built around 5,000 ‘large dams’ (according to the definition of International Commission of Large Dams).
- 2.
A part of the information here is based on interviews with South Asia Network of Dams Rivers and People (SANDRP), Kalpvriksh and Dhomiya Ganga Sangharsh Samiti, conducted in June 2009.
- 3.
This is based on the review of various legal documents, which included a number of signed petitions filed by the people affected by the project and the project developer, accessed from the website of Himachal Pradesh High Court.
- 4.
This is based on the review of various legal documents, which included number of writ petitions filed by the people affected by the project and the project developer, accessed from the website of Himachal Pradesh High Court.
- 5.
This is based on interviews with some members of the community and a review of the legal documents submitted with Himachal Pradesh High Court.
- 6.
The Shukla Committee found that in a 70 km long river basin, only a 3 km stretch of the river was found to flow on the original river bed, while the other 67 km of the river was diverted through the tunnels.
References
Arts J, Meijer J (2006) Designing for EIA follow-up: experiences from Netherlands. In: Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J (eds) Assessing impact handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. Earthscan, London, pp 63–96
Arts J, Morrison-Saunders A (2006) Theoretical perspectives on EIA and EIA follow-up. In: Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J (eds) Assessing impact handbook of EIA and SEA follow-up. Earthscan, London, pp 22–41
Arts J, Nooteboom S (1999) Environmental impact assessment monitoring and auditing. In: Petts J (ed) Handbook of environmental impact assessment. Vol 1: environmental impact assessment: process, methods and potential. Blackwell Science, Cornwall, pp 229–251
Arts J, Caldwell P, Morrison-Saunders A (2001) Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions – findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 conference. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 19(3):175–185
Cashmore M (2004) The role of science in Environmental Impact Assessment: process and procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environ Impact Assess Rev 24:403–426
Chauhan K (2009) Forest Dept’s [Department’s] role under scanner. The Tribune. http://www.tribuneindia.com/2009/20091124/himachal.htm#10. Accessed 12 July 2010
Choudhury N (2010) Sustainable dam development in India – between global norms and local practices (Discussion paper 10/2010). German Development Institute, Bonn
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1987) Annual report 1986–87. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1988) Annual report 1987–88. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1989) Annual report 1988–1989. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1990) Annual report 1989–1990. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1991) Annual report 1990–1991. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1992) Annual report 1991–1992. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1993) Annual report 1992–1993. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1994a) Annual report 1993–1994. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1994b) Environment Impact Assessment notification, S.O. 60(E) (27 January 1994). In: Nandimath OV (ed) Oxford handbook of environmental decision making in India: an EIA model. Oxford University Press, New Delhi, pp 174–183
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1995) Annual report 1994–1995. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1996) Annual report 1995–1996. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1997) Annual report 1996–1997. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1998) Annual report 1997–1998. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (1999) Annual report 1998–1999. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2000) Annual report 1999–2000. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2001) Annual report 2000–2001. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2002) Annual report 2001–2002. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2003) Annual report 2002–2003. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2004) Annual report 2003–2004. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2005) Annual report 2004–2005. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2006a) Annual report 2005–2006. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2006b) The 2006 notification, S.O. 1533(E) (14 September 2006). http://www.moef.nic.in/legis/eia/so1533.pdf. Accessed 7 Apr 2011
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2007) Annual report 2006–2007. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2008) Annual report 2007–2008. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2009a) Annual report 2008–2009. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2009b) Towards effective environmental governance: proposal for a National Environment Protection Authority (Discussion Paper). Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2010a) Annual report 2009–2010. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2010b) Reforms in environmental governance: with special reference to establishment of National Environment Assessment and Monitoring Authority (NEAMA) (Discussion Paper). Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoEF (Government of India, Ministry of Environment and Forest) (2011) Annual report 2010–2011. Ministry of Environment and Forest, Delhi
GoI/MoF (Government of India, Ministry of Finance) (2009) Expert group to examine the schemes of statutory clearances for industrial and infrastructure projects in India. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/files/Report%2020Ministry%20of%20Finance.pdf. Accessed 2 Sept 2009
HCHP (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (2009) Civil Writ Petition Public Interest Litigation No. 24/2009: Court on its own-versus-state of Himachal Pradesh. Interim Order (23 December 2009)
HCHP (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (2010a) Civil Writ Petition Public Interest Litigation No. 24/2009: Court on its own-versus-state of Himachal Pradesh. Interim Order (09 August 2010)
HCHP (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (2010b) Civil Writ Petition Public Interest Litigation No. 29/2009: Court on its own-versus-state of Himachal Pradesh. Interim Order (06 August 2010)
HCHP (High Court of Himachal Pradesh) (2010c) Civil Writ Petition Public Interest Litigation No. 29/2009: Court on its own-versus-state of Himachal Pradesh. Interim Order (09 August 2010)
IFC/CAO (International Finance Corporation, Compliance Advisor Ombudsman) (2004) Assessment report complaint regarding Allain Duhangan hydropower project Himachal Pradesh, India. Office of the Compliance Advisor Ombudsman International Finance Corporation Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency, Washington, DC
IR (International Rivers) (2009) International Rivers. Website: http://www.internationalriversorg/n/outh-asia/ndia/affected-people-world-bank-regarding-allain-duhangan-hydro-project. Accessed 2 Sept 2000
Jha-Thakur U, Fischer TB, Rajvanshi A (2009) Reviewing design stage of Environmental Impact Assessment follow-up: looking at the open cast coal mines in India. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 27(1):33–44
Marshall R (2005) Environmental Impact Assessment follow-up and its benefits for industry. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 23(3):191–196
Marshall R, Arts J, Morrison-Saunders A (2005) International principles for best practice EIA follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 23(3):175–181
Menon M, Kohli K (2008) Reengineering the legal and policy regimes on environment. Econ Political Wkly 43(23):14–17
Menon M, Kohli K (2009) From impact assessment to clearance manufacture. Econ Political Wkly 44(28):20–23
Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J (2005) Editorial. Learning from experience: emerging trends in environmental impact assessment follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 23(3):170–174
Morrison-Saunders A, Arts J, Baker J, Caldwell P (2001) Roles and stakes in Environmental Impact Assessment follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 19(4):289–296
Morrison-Saunders A, Baker J, Arts J (2003) Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 21(1):43–56
Nandimath OV (ed) (2009) Oxford handbook of environmental decision making in India: an EIA model. Oxford University Press, New Delhi
Paliwal R (2006) EIA practice in India and its evaluation using SWOT analysis. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26:492–510
Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Rajaram T, Das A (2006) EIA in India. Need for participatory and sustainable principles in India’s EIA system: lessons from the Sethusamudram Ship Channel Project. Impact Assess Proj Apprais 24(2):115–126
Ramesh J (2010) The two cultures revisited: some reflections on the environment-development debate in India. Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research, Bangalore
Rowe G, Frewer L (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 30(2):251–290
Roy D (2008) Hydropower in Uttarakhand: is ‘Development’ the real objective? Econ Political Wkly 43(41):19–22
Acknowledgements
The author acknowledges the generous support of International Postgraduate Studies in Water Technologies (IPSWaT) for supporting the field research for this study. The author would also like to thank the many resource persons, interactions with whom have enormously helped the author in developing a better understanding of environmental governance in India. The author would like to thank an anonymous reviewer whose comments have significantly improved the chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Choudhury, N. (2014). Environment in an Emerging Economy: The Case of Environmental Impact Assessment Follow-Up in India. In: Nüsser, M. (eds) Large Dams in Asia. Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2798-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2798-4_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2797-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2798-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)