Skip to main content

Results from School Leadership Effectiveness Studies (2005–2010)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
School Leadership Effects Revisited

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

In this chapter an overview is presented of recent studies in which the impact of school leadership on student achievement was investigated. The technique of meta-analysis was used to synthesize the results of 25 studies published between 2005 and 2010. In the meta-analysis both studies exploiting direct and indirect models of school leadership were examined. Next, the conceptual content of the school leadership measures and intermediary variables used in the studies was analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., et al. (2009). The impact of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Nottingham: The National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Maeyer, S., Rymenans, R., van Petegem, P., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2007). Instructional leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effects in school effectiveness research. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (1983). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford University, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996a). Reassessing the principals role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980–1995. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32, 5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1996b). The principal’ s role in school effectiveness an assessment of methodological progress 1980–1995. In K. Leithwood, et al. (Eds.), IInternational handbook of instructional leadership and administration. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Testing a dynamic model of organizational leadership and school improvement effects on growth in learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of American Educational Research Association, disciplined inquiry: Education research in the circle of knowledge, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2010). Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 867–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Moriyama, K. (2010). Examining relationships among elementary schools’ contexts, leadership, instructional practices, and added-year outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), 377–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 491–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 218–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 529–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 671–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., & Kruse, S. D. (1995). Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., Martinez-Arias, R., Marchesi, A., & Perez, E. M. (2008). Variables that predict academic achievement in the Spanish compulsory secondary educational system: A longitudinal, multi-level analysis. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 400–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, R. J., & White, G. P. (2005). Within the account era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89(645), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2007). Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education? British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 179–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitner, N. J. (1986). Substitutes for principal leader behavior: An exploratory study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22(2), 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement. The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(3), 798–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., Steen, R., & Luyten-de Thouars, Y. (2007). Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Enschede: University of Twente, Department of Educational Organisation and Management.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J. A. (2008). Instructional leadership in American high schools. In M. M. Mangin & S. R. Stoelinga (Eds.), Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform (pp. 144–162). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bruggencate, G. (2009). Maken schoolleiders het verschil? [Do school leaders make a difference?]. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bruggencate, G., Luyten, H., & Scheerens, J. (2010). Quantitative analysis of international data, exploring indrect effect models of school leadership. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

Annex: References Used in the Meta-Analyses: Direct Effect Models

  • Anderson, J. B. (2008). Principals’ role and public primary schools’ effectiveness in four Latin American cities The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 36–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden, A. M. (2010). Relationships between Paraguayan principals’ characteristics, teachers’ perceptions of instructional leadership and school outcomes’, International Journal of Leadership in Education, First published on: 29 October 2010 (iFirst).

    Google Scholar 

  • Horng, E. L., Klasik, D., & Loeb, S. (2010). Principal’s time use and school effectiveness. American Journal of Education, 116(4), 491–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kythreotis, A., Pashiardis, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2010). The influence of school leadership styles and culture on students’ achievement in Cyprus primary schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(2), 218–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, E., Martinez-Arias, R., Marchesi, A., & Perez, E. M. (2008). Variables that predict academic achievement in the spanish compulsory secondary educational system: A longitudinal, multi-level analysis. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 400–413.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. J., & Rowan, B. (2006). Effects of organic management on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 219–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, R. J., & White, G. P. (2005). Within the account era: Principals’ instructional leadership behaviors and student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 89(645), 56–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdenakker, M., & Van Damme, J. (2006). Differences between secondary schools: A study about school context, group composition, school practice and school effects with special attention to public and catholic schools and types of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(1), 87–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S-H., & Slater, Ch. L. (2010). Principal leadership and mathematics achievement: An international comparative study. School Leadership & Management, 30(4), 317–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Indirect Effect Models

  • Day, C., Sammons, P., Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Leithwood, K., Gu, Q., et al. (2009). The Impcat of school leadership on pupil outcomes. Nottingham: The National College for School Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Maeyer, S., Rymenans, R., van Petegem, P., van den Bergh, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2007). Instructional leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effects in school effectiveness research. School effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, Ph. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, Ph. (2010). Testing a longitudinal model of distributed leadership effects on school improvement. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 867–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H., & Moriyama, K. (2010). Examining relationships among elementary schools’ contexts, leadership, instructional practices, and added-year outcomes: A regression discontinuity approach. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(4), 377–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., & McElheron-Hopkins, Ch. (2006). The development and testing of a school improvement model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(4), 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2008). Linking leadership to student learning: The contributions of leader efficacy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 496–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., & Mascall, B. (2008). Collective leadership effects on student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 529–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 671–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, K. S., Dretzke, B., & Wahlstrom, K. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(3), 315–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opdenakker, M.-C., & Van Damme, J. (2007). Do school context, student composition and school leadership affect school practice and outcomes in secondary education? British Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 179–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross John, A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29(3), 798–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J., Sirinides, Ph., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46, 31–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bruggencate, G. C. (2009). Maken schoolleiders het verschil? [Do school leaders make a difference?]. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Bruggencate, G., Luyten, H., & Scheerens, J. (2010). Quantitative analysis of international data exploring indrect effect models of school leadership. Enschede: University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Hendriks .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Table A.1 Characteristics from direct effect studies on school leadership (2005–2010)
Table A.2 Characteristics of indirect effect studies on school leadership
Table A.3 Direct and indirect paths from school leadership to student achievement and total effect sizes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hendriks, M., Steen, R. (2012). Results from School Leadership Effectiveness Studies (2005–2010). In: Scheerens, J. (eds) School Leadership Effects Revisited. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2768-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics