Skip to main content

Earlier Meta-Analyses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
School Leadership Effects Revisited

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

Abstract

In this chapter we will summarise meta-analyses that we conducted earlier (Scheerens and Bosker 1997; Scheerens et al. 2007). In the final section a brief overview of the results of other meta-analyses will be given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bosker, R. J., & Witziers, B. (1995, January). School effects, problems, solution and a meta-analysis. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. I. (2001). A meta-analysis of research on the influence of leadership on student outcomes. Unpublished Ph.D., Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J. (1994). Vote-counting procedures in meta-analysis. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 193–213). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, J. M.-C. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 166–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, S. (1992). Transformational leadership. In integrative review of the literature (Doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, J. J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. Mahwah, N. J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, G. A., Edwards, J. E., & Raju, N. S. (1989). Organizational development interventions: A meta-analysis of their effects on satisfaction and other attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 42(3), 461–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pantili, L., Williams, J., & Fortune, J. (1991, April). Principal assessment: Effective or not? A meta-analytic model. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (1985). Empirical Bayes meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 10(2), 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C., & Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership type. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1994). Parametric measures of effect size. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 231–244). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., Luyten, H., Steen, R., & Luyten-de Thouars, Y. (2007). Review and meta-analyses of school and teaching effectiveness. Enschede: Department of Educational Organisation and Management, University of Twente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerens, J., Seidel, T., Witziers, B., Hendriks, M., & Doornekamp, G. (2005). Positioning the supervision frameworks for primary and secondary education of the Dutch Educational Inspectorate in current educational discourse and validating core indicators against the knowledge base of educational effectiveness research. Enschede/Kiel: University of Twente/Institute for Science Education (IPN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T. J., & Marzano, R. J. (2006). School district leadership that works: The effect of superintendent leadership on student achievement. Denver, CO: Mid-continent Research for Education and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003). Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us about the effect of leadership on student achievement. A working paper. Mid-continent Regional Educational Lab., Aurora, CO. [BBB23081]. Research for Education and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, A. W. (2002, February). Principals’ instructional management activity and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Educational Research Association, Austin, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witziers, B., Bosker, R. J., & Krüger, M. L. (2003). Instructional leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association. Educational Administrative Quarterly, 39(3), 398–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaap Scheerens .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annex: Research Articles Used for the Meta-Analyses by the Authors

Annex: Research Articles Used for the Meta-Analyses by the Authors

Articles on School Leadership (1985–1995)

Bamburg, J. D., & Andrews, R. L. (1991). School Goals, Principals and Achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 175–191.

Bedford, B. (1993). School effectiveness characteristics and student achievement: a study of relationships in Georgia Middle Schools. ERIC document No. EA 020 722.

Blank, R. K. (1987). The role of principal as leader: Analysis of variation in leadership of urban high schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 81(2), 69–80.

Brandsma, H., & Knuver, A. (1989). De invloed van school-en klaskenmerken op rekenprestaties in het onderwijs. In J. Scheerens & J. C. Verhoeven (red.), Schoolorganisatie, beleid en onderwijskwaliteit.

Brewer, D. J. (1993). Principals and student outcomes. Economics of Education Review, 12(4), 281–292.

Cantu, M. (1994). A study of principal instructional leadership behaviors in successful and non-successful urban elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Dissertation Abstract International, 55(7), January 1995. Austin: University of Texas.

Couch, J. C. (1991). A study of student achievement and how it relates to the principal in the role of instructional leader. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Lexington, New York.

Durland, M., & Teddlie, Ch. (1996). A network analysis of the structural dimensions of principal leadership in differentially effective schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, New York.

Eberts, R. W., & Stone, J. A. (1988). Student achievement in public schools: do principals make a difference. Economics of Education Review, 7(3), 291–299.

Ellet, C. D., & Logan, C. S. (1990). Analyses of school learning environments: organizational coupling, robustness and effectiveness. Paper presented at the AERA, Boston.

Friedkin, N. E., & Slater, M. R. (1994). School leadership and performance: a social network approach. Sociology of Education, 67(2), 139–157.

Gouldring, E. B., & Pasternak, R. (1994). Principals’ coordinating strategies and school effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 239–253.

Grift, W. van de (1987). Zelfpercepties van onderwijskundig leiderschap en gemiddelde leerprestaties. In J. Scheerens & W. G. R. Stoel (Eds.), Effectiviteit van onderwij-sorganisaties. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Grift, W. van de (1990). Instructional leadership and academic achievement in elementary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 1(3), 26–40.

Grisay, A. (1995). Effective and less effective junior schools in France. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ICSEI, Leeuwarden.

Guillemard, L., Palmer, D. J., & Wilson, V. L. (1994). Discrimination of average, effective and ineffective intermediate and secondary schools from ratings of school characteristics by parents, students, teachers and principals. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AREA, New Orleans.

Hallinger, P. (1989). What makes a difference? School context, principal leadership and student achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, San Francisco.

Heck, R., Marcoulides, G. A., & Lang, P. (1991). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: The application of discriminant techniques. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(2), 115–135.

Hill, P. W., Rowe, K. J., & Holmes-Smith, P. (1995). Factors affecting students’ educational progress: Multilevel modeling of educational effectiveness. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ICSEI, Leeuwarden.

Hofman, R. H. (1993). Effectief schoolbestuur: een studie naar de bijdrage van schoolbesturen aan de effectiviteit van scholen. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, dissertatie.

Houtveen, Th., Vermeulen, C., & Van der Grift, W. (1993). Bouwstenen voor onderzoek naar de kwaliteit van scholen. Utrecht: ISOR.

Hoy, W. K., Tater, J. C., & Bliss, J. R. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness: a comparative analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(3), 260–279.

Hunter, C. (1994). Los Angeles unified school district middle school principals’ instructional behaviors and academic achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Dissertation Abstracts International, 55(12), June 1995. Los Angeles: Peppardine University.

Krug, S. E. (1992). Instructional leadership, school instructional climate and student learning outcomes. Department of Education, Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.

Leitner, D. (1994). Do principals affect student outcomes: an organizational perspective. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 5(3), 219–238.

Mandeville, G. K., & Kennedy, E. (1991). The relationship of effective school indicators and changes in the social distribution of achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2, 14–33.

Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D., & Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: the junior years. Somerset: Open Books.

Postlewaithe, N., & Ross, K. (1992). Effective schools in reading; implications for educational planners. Den Haag: IEA.

Reezigt, G., Guldemond, H., & Creemers, B. (1995). The empirical validity of the school effectiveness model. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ECER, Bath.

Rowan, B. P., Chiang, F. S., & Miller, R. J. (1996). Using research on employee performance to study teaching effectiveness: results from an analysis of teachers effects on student achievement in mathematics using NELS: 88 data. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, New York.

Rymenans, R., Geudens, V., Coucke, H., Van den Bergh, H., & Daems, F. (1996). Effectiviteit van Vlaamse secundaire scholen: een onderzoek naar de effecten van het onderwijsaanbod, de tijdsbesteding aan het Nederlands en de schoolkenmerken op de lees- en schrijfprestaties. Antwerpen: Universiteit van Antwerpen.

Sontag, L., & Meijnen, G. W. (1995). De invloed van school- en klaskenmerken op de cognitieve en linguïstische vaardigheden van kleuters. Pedagogische Studiën, 72(4), 258–272.

Tam, W. M., & Cheng, Y. C. (1995). School environment and student performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the ICSEI, Leeuwarden.

Teddlie, C., & Stringfield, S. (1993). Schools make a difference. Lessons learned from a 10 year study of school effects. New York: Teachers College Press.

Vermeulen, C. J. (1987). De effectiviteit van 17 Rotterdamse stimuleringsscholen. Pedagogische Studiën, 64, 49–58.

Werf, M. P. C. van der, & Weide, M. G. (1991). Effectief onderwijs voor allochtone leerlingen. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 16(4), 231–243.

Werf, M. P. C. van der, & Weide, M. G. (1993). Effectieve voorrangskenmerken in de school en klas. Pedagogische Studiën, 70, 108–221.

Witziers, B. (1992). Coördinatie binnen scholen voor voortgezet onderwijs. Enschede: Universiteit Twente, dissertatie.

Yelton, B. T., Miller, K., & Ruscoe, G. C. (1994). The stability of school effectiveness: comparative path models. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, New Orleans, 4–8 April.

Articles on School Leadership (1995–2005)

Creemers, B., & Werf, G. v. d. (2000). Economic viewpoints in educational effectiveness: Cost-effectiveness analysis of an educational improvement project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(3), 361–384.

D’Agostino, J. V. (2000). Instructional and school effects on students’ longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(2), 197–235.

Deinum, J. F. (2000). Schoolbeleid, instructie en leerresultaten. Groningen: GION.

Griffith, J. (2003). Schools as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 29–47.

Grift, W. van de, & Houtveen, A. A. M. (1999). Instructional leadership and pupil achievement in primary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(4), 373–389.

Grift, W. van de, Houtveen, T., & Vermeulen, C. (1997). Instructional climate in Dutch secondary education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(4), 449–462.

Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.

Heck, R. H., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1996). School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(1), 76–95.

Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1998). Modelling student progress in studies of educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(3), 310–333.

Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H. A., & Guldemond, H. (1999). Social and cognitive outcomes: A comparison of contexts of learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(3), 352–366.

Hofman, R. H., Hofman, W. H. A., & Guldemond, H. (2001). The effectiveness of cohesive schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4(2), 115–135.

Jacob, B. A., & Lefgren, L. (2004). The impact of teacher training on student achievement- quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. Journal Of Human Resources, 39(1), 50–79.

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. School Leadership and Management, 20(4), 415–434.

Levačić, R., Steele, F., Smees, R., & Malmberg, L. (2003, 11–13 September). The relationship between school climate & head teacher leadership, and pupil attainment: Evidence from a sample of English secondary schools. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Edinburgh.

Marks, H. M., & Printy, S. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: An integration of transformational and instructional leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 39(3), 370–397.

Reezigt, G. J., Guldemond, H., & Creemers, B. P. M. (1999). Empirical validity for a comprehensive model on educational effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 10(2), 24.

Trautwein, U., Koller, O., Schmitz, B., & Baumert, J. (2002). Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27(1), 26–50.

Werf, G. van der (1997). Differences in school and instruction characteristics between high-, average-, and low-effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 8(4), 430–448.

Werf, G. van der, Creemers, B., Jong, R. de, & Klaver, E. (2000). Evaluation of school improvement through an educational effectiveness model: The case of Indonesia’s PEQIP project. Comparative Education Review, 44(3), 329–355.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Scheerens, J., Steen, R. (2012). Earlier Meta-Analyses. In: Scheerens, J. (eds) School Leadership Effects Revisited. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2768-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics