Abstract
This chapter suggests iconic language that may help to bridge cultural and ecological approaches to education in our times. First, human beings live in and have created through their ecological impact a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene. The changes that the human species are bringing to our earth are dramatic from many scientific perspectives. Second, for decades scientists have understood that our ecological impacts are a function of a growth-without-limits paradigm, and that impact is the product of increasing population and increasing levels of affluence. If unqualified economic growth is problematic, the iconic expression IPAT should remind us that our economic paradigm comes with consequences. Third, students of culture need to uncover how the story of economic growth is rooted in a longer history of colonization. Fourth, when connecting economic development to the exploitation of land and people, Aboriginal experience should be acknowledged to better understand the living legacy of colonization. A cultural-studies approach to education that is responsive to the Anthropocene, that recovers a sense of the relationship between economics and ecological impact, and that interrupts the colonial mindset, is an approach that will seek to decolonize and reinhabit self, relationship, place, and planet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Berry, T. (1988). The dream of the earth. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Cajete, G. (1994). Look to the mountain: An ecology of indigenous education. Durango: Kivaki Press.
Carlson, D., & Dimitriadis, G. (2003). Promises to keep: Cultural studies, democratic education, and public life. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Carson, R. (1962). Silent spring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Chertow, M. R. (2000). The IPAT equation and its variants. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4(4), 13–29.
Crutzen, P. J., & Stoermer, E. F. (2000). The Anthropocene. IGPB Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
Delpit, L. (1995). Other people’s children. New York: The New Press.
Gay, G. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.
Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Greenwood, D. (2008). A critical pedagogy of place: From gridlock to parallax. Environmental Education Research, 14, 336–348.
Gruenewald, D. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.
Gruenewald, D. (2004). A Foucauldian analysis of environmental education: Toward the socio-ecological challenge of the Earth Charter. Curriculum Inquiry, 34, 63–99.
Gruenewald, D., & Manteaw, B. (2007). Oil and water still: How No Child Left Behind limits and distorts environmental education in U.S. schools. Environmental Education Research, 13, 171–188.
Hursh, D. (2007). Assessing No Child Left Behind and the rise of neoliberal education policies. American Educational Research Journal, 44, 493–518.
Hytten, K. (2011). Cultural studies in education. In S. Tozer, B. P. Gallegos, A. M. Henry, M. B. Greiner, & P. G. Price (Eds.), Handbook of research in the social foundations of education (pp. 205–219). New York: Routledge.
Kahn, R. (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, and planetary crisis: The ecopedagogy movement. New York: Peter Lang.
Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.
Ladson-Billings, G. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Marker, M. (2006). After the Makah whale Hunt: Indigenous knowledge and limits to multicultural discourse. Urban Education, 41, 482–505.
McKenzie, M., & Greenwood, D. (2009). Context, experience, and the socioecological: Inquiries into practice [Special issue]. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 5.
McKibben, B. (2010). Eaarth: Making life on a tough new planet. New York: Times Books.
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). Limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.
Nespor, J. (2008). Education and place: A review essay. Educational Theory, 58, 475–489.
Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.
Spring, J. (1998). Education and the rise of the global economy. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stevenson, R. B. (1987). Schooling and environmental education: Contradictions in purpose and practice. In I. M. Robottom (Ed.), Environmental education: Practice and possibility. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Diets, T. (2003). STIRPAT, IPAT and ImPACT: Analytical tools for unpacking the driving forces of environmental impacts. Ecological Economics, 46(3), 351–365.
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Steffen, W., & Crutzen, P. (2010). The new world of the Anthropocene. Environmental Science and Technology, 44(7), 2228–2231.
Acknowledgement
The author thanks Arthur Stewart for his insights on an earlier draft of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greenwood, D.A. (2014). Culture, Environment, and Education in the Anthropocene. In: Mueller, M., Tippins, D., Stewart, A. (eds) Assessing Schools for Generation R (Responsibility). Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, vol 41. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2748-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2747-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2748-9
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)