Skip to main content

Patterns and Graded Algebraic Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1486 Accesses

Abstract

In this concluding chapter, we discuss ways in which algebra can be grounded in patterning activity. As a consequence, the development of algebraic generalization is also graded from nonsymbolic, to pre-symbolic, and finally to symbolic, reflective of the conceptual changes that occurred in the history of the subject. Over the course of four sections, we clarify the following points: (1) the different contexts of patterning activity and the kinds of algebraic generalizations they generate; (2) the relationship between arithmetical thinking and context-based structural thinking; (3) the grounding of algebra, functions, and models in nonsymbolic and pre-symbolic algebraic contexts; and (4) the graded vs. transitional nature of pattern generalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes, M., & Gordon, S. (1987). Mathematical induction. Sydney, Australia: Mathematics Learning Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhoff, G. (1977). Current trends in algebra. In S. Montgomery, E. Ralston, S. R. Gordon, G. Janusz, M. Schacher, & M. Smith (Eds.), Selected papers on algebra (pp. 463–485). Washington, DC: The Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Center, C. D. (2004). Ensuring teacher quality: Algebra I. Austin, TX: The University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derbyshire, J. (2006). Unknown quantity: A real and imaginary history of algebra. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, G., & Panza, M. (2012). Lagrange’s theory of analytical functions and his ideal purity of method. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 66, 95–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K., Kalchman, M., & Bransford, J. (2005). Mathematical understanding: An introduction. In M. S. Donovan & J. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 217–256). Washington, DC: National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner, D. (2010). Bootstrapping the mind: Analogical processes and symbol systems. Cognitive Science, 34, 752–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeffer, A. (2008). The emergence of symbolic algebra as a shift in predominant models. Foundations of Science, 13, 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heeffer, A. (2010). Learning concepts through the history of mathematics: The case of symbolic algebra. In K. François & J. P. Van Bendegem (Eds.), Philosophical dimensions in mathematics education (pp. 83–103). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, V. (2007). Stages in the history of algebra with implications for teaching. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvasz, L. (2006). The history of algebra and the development of the form of its language. Philosophia Mathematica, 14, 287–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, F., Yang, K., & Chen, C. (2004). The features and relationships of reasoning, proving, and understanding proof in number patterns. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2, 227–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malisani, E., & Spagnoio, F. (2009). From arithmetical thought to algebraic thought: The role of the variable. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71, 19–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1989). Mathematical abstraction as the result of a delicate shift of attention. For the Learning of Mathematics, 9(2), 2–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesa, V. (2004). Characterizing practices associated with functions in middle school textbooks: An empirical account. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56, 255–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osserman, R. (1981). Structure vs. substance: The fall and rise of geometry. The Two-Year College Mathematics Journal, 12(4), 239–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, T., & Baldridge, S. (2004). Elementary mathematics for teachers. Okemos, MI: Sefton-Ash Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivera, F. (2011). Toward a visually-oriented school mathematics curriculum: Research, theory, practice, and issues (Mathematics Education Library Series 49). New York, NY: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivera, F. (2013). Patterns and Graded Algebraic Thinking. In: Teaching and Learning Patterns in School Mathematics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2712-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics