Skip to main content
  • 1437 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we paint in broad strokes issues on pattern generalization in school mathematical contexts that we explore in this book over several chapters. We clarify what we mean by patterns, structures, and pattern generalization activity. Readers are also introduced to the basic characteristic features of our proposed theory of graded pattern generalization processing. We end the chapter with an overview of the remaining chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

     This characterization of structure in generalization is consistent with Davydov’s (2008) definition of generalization, “(g)eneralization involves searching for some invariant property within a class of objects …. The general, as something recurring or stable, is a definite invariant of the various properties of a given type of object—i.e. it is essential. In many works, the terms ‘general’ and ‘essential’ are used interchangeably: ‘To identify attributes as essential, they must be found to be general or common to a certain set of objects but not to some other set of objects’” (p. 74).

  2. 2.

     In this book, we share Davydov’s (2008) view regarding the strong link between generalization and abstraction, as follows: “Generalization is regarded as inseparably linked with the operation of abstraction. Singling out some essential quality as a general or common one means abstracting it from other qualities. This enables the child to transform the general quality into an independent and special object of subsequent actions (the general quality is labeled by some word). Knowledge of the general, since it is the result of making a comparison and recording the result using a word, is always something abstract, extracted, thinkable” (p. 75; italics added for emphasis).

References

  • Clements, D., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. New York, NY: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • du Sautoy, M. (2008). Symmetry: A journey into the patterns of nature. New York, NY: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R. (1998). About reasoning in geometry. In C. Mammana & V. Villani (Eds.), Perspectives on the teaching of geometry for the 21 st century (pp. 29–37). Boston: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1995). Long term algebra reform: Democratizing access to big ideas. In C. Lacampagne, W. Blair, & J. Kaput (Eds.), The algebra initiative colloquium (Vol. 1, pp. 33–49). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, M. (1980). Mathematics: The loss of certainty. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte, M. (2011). Evolution, learning, and semiotics from a Peircean point of view. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(2–3), 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papic, M., Mulligan, J., & Mitchelmore, M. (2011). Assessing the development of preschoolers’ mathematical patterning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 42(3), 237–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. (1960). Collected papers of Charles Saunders Peirce: Volumes I and II. Cambridge, MA: The Belnap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2010). The eye as a theoretician: Seeing structures in generalizing activities. For the Learning of Mathematics, 30(2), 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T., & McClelland, J. (2008). Précis of semantic cognition: A parallel distributed processing approach. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31, 689–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strevens, M. (2008). Depth: An account of scientific explanation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work has been supported by a Career Grant from the National Science Foundation under Grant Number DRL 0448649 awarded to me between 2005 and 2012. I take full responsibility for all the views and opinions expressed in this book. My sincere thanks to all my program officers who allowed me to pursue work in this research area. A warm thanks as well to Joanne Rossi Becker, SJSU colleague, who collaborated with me in the early foundational stages of this work. I am grateful to all my students and their teachers, from first to eighth grade, who generously shared their thinking on patterns.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rivera, F. (2013). Introduction. In: Teaching and Learning Patterns in School Mathematics. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2712-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics