Abstract
The single degree-of-freedom system subject to mass and base excitation is used to model an elastic system to determine the frequency-domain effects of squeeze film air damping and viscous fluid damping. This model is also used to determine the important response characteristics of electrostatic attraction and van der Waals forces, the maximum average power from piezoelectric and electromagnetic coupling, and to illustrate the fundamental working principle of an atomic force microscope. The two degree-of-freedom system is introduced to examine microelectromechanical filters, atomic force microscope specimen control devices, and as a means to increase the input to piezoelectric energy harvesters. An appendix gives the details of the derivation of a hydrodynamic function that expresses the effects of a viscous fluid on a vibrating cylinder.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
If i is the current, e is the voltage, and q the charge, then the potential energy of a capacitor is
$$U_e = \int {iedt} = \int {edq} = C\int {ede} = \frac{1}{2}Ce^2$$since and \(i = dq/dt\) and q = Ce, where C is the capacitance. For parallel plates separated by a distance g o , \(C = \varepsilon _o A/g_o\) and we have
$$U_e = \frac{{\varepsilon _o Ae^2 }}{{2g_o }}.$$The force is obtained from
$$F = - \frac{{\partial U_e }}{{\partial g_o }} = \frac{{\varepsilon _o Ae^2 }}{{2g_o^2 }}.$$ - 2.
During manufacture, a piezoelectric material is polarized with a DC electric field with a polarizing voltage that is usually applied at a temperature slightly below the material’s Curie temperature. Prior to the application of the polarizing voltage the dipole moments are randomly oriented. If the negative terminal of the polarizing voltage is at the top of the material, the direction of the polarizing axis is considered to go from the bottom of the material (positive terminal) to the top. After the removal of the polarizing voltage, the dipole moments are permanently aligned in what is called the poling direction. Compression (tension) of the material along the direction of polarization or tension (compression) perpendicular to the polarization direction generates a voltage of the same (opposite) polarity as the poling voltage.
- 3.
The following units may prove useful in the subsequent material. If C = coulomb, J = joule, V = volt, A = ampere, W = watt, H = henry, and F = farad, then J = Ws = Nm, V = J/C, A = C/s, F = C/V, ohm = Js/C2, and H = Js2/C2. Also note the distinction in the use of the symbol C: C is coulomb when not italicized and C italicized in this chapter denotes a capacitor.
- 4.
The MATLAB function ilaplace from the Symbolic Math toolbox was used.
- 5.
The MATLAB function ilaplace from the Symbolic Math toolbox was used.
References
Abramovitch DY, Andersson SB, Pao LY, Schitter G (2007) A tutorial on the mechanisms, dynamics, and control of atomic force microscopes. Proceedings of the 2007 American Control Conference, pp 3488–3502
Aldraihem O, Baz A (2011) Energy harvester with a dynamic magnifier. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 22(6):521–530
ANSI/IEEE Std 176-1987 (1988) IEEE standard on piezoelectricity. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, New York, NY
Anton SR, Sodano HA (2007) A review of power harvesting using piezoelectric materials (2003–2006). Smart Mater Struct 16:R1–R21
Arnold DP (2007) Review of microscale magnetic power generation. IEEE Trans Magn 43(11):3940–3951
Balachandran B, Magrab EB (2009) Vibrations, 2nd edn. Cengage, Toronto, ON
Bannon FD, Clark JR, Nguyen CT-C (2000) High-Q HF microelectromechanical filters. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits 35(4):512–536
Bao M, Yang H (2007) Review: squeeze film air damping in MEMS. Sens Actuators A 136(1):3–27
Batra RC, Porfiri M, Spinello D (2007) Review of modeling electrostatically actuated microelectromechanical systems. Smart Mater Struct 16(6):R23–R31
Beeby SP, Tudor MJ, White NM (2006) Energy harvesting vibration sources for microsystems applications. Meas Sci Technol 17:R175–R195
Beeby SP, Torah RN, Tudor MJ, Glynne-Jones P, O’Donnell T, Saha CR, Roy S (2007) A micro electromagnetic generator for vibration energy harvesting. J Micromech Microeng 17:1257–1265
Bergström L (1997) Hamaker constants of inorganic materials. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 70:125–169
Bhiladvala RB, Wang ZJ (2004) Effect of fluids on the Q factor and resonance frequency of oscillating micrometer and nanometer scale beams. Phys Rev E 69:036307
Binnig GK, Quate CF, Gerber C (1986) Atomic force microscope. Phys Rev Lett 56:930–933
Blech JJ (1983) On isothermal squeeze films. ASME J Lubr Technol 105:615–620
Burnham NA, Behrend OP, Oulevey F, Gremaud G, Gallo P-J, Gourdon D, Dupas E, Kulik AJ, Pollock HM, Briggs GAD (1997) How does a tip tap? Nanotechnology 8(2):67–75
Butt H-J, Cappella B, Kappl M (2005) Force measurements with the atomic force microscope: technique, interpretation and applications. Surf Sci Rep 59:1–152
Chen SS, Wambsganss MW, Jendrzejczyk JA (1976) Added mass and damping of a vibrating rod in confined viscous fluids. ASME J Appl Mech 43:325–328
Cheng S, Wang N, Arnold DP (2007) Modeling of magnetic vibrational energy harvesters using equivalent circuit representations. J Micromech Microeng 17:2328–2335
Chivukila VB, Rhoads JF (2010) Microelectromechanical bandpass filters based on cyclic coupling architectures. J Sound Vib 329(20):4313–4332
Cornwell PJ, Goethal J, Kowko J, Damianakis M (2005) Enhancing power harvesting using a tuned auxiliary structure. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16:825–834
Crandall IB (1918) The air-damped vibrating system: theoretical calibration of the condenser transmitter. Phys Rev 11(6):449–460
Darling RB, Hivick C, Xu J (1998) Compact analytical modeling of squeeze film damping with arbitrary venting conditions using a Green’s function approach. Sens Actuators A 70:32–41
duToit NE, Wardle BL, Kim S-G (2005) Design considerations for MEMS-scale piezoelectric mechanical vibration energy harvesters. Integr Ferroelectrics 71:121–160
Elka A, Bucher I (2008) On the synthesis of micro-electromechanical filters using structural dynamics. J Micromech Microeng 18:125018
Gabrielson TB (1993) Micromachined mechanical-thermal noise in acoustic and vibration sensors. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 40(5):903–909
Gallis MA, Torczynski JR (2004) An improved reynolds-equation model for gas damping of microbeam motion. J Microelectromech Syst 13(4):653–659
Garcıa R, San Paulo A (1999) Attractive and repulsive tip-sample interaction regimes in tapping-mode atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B 60(7):4961–4967
Halvorsen E (2008) Energy harvesters driven by broadband random vibrations. J Microelectromech Syst 17(5):1061–1071
Hutcherson S, Ye W (2004) On the squeeze-film damping of micro-resonators in the free-molecule regime. J Micromech Microeng 14:1726–1733
Jalili N, Laxminarayana K (2004) A review of atomic force microscopy imaging systems: application to molecular metrology and biological sciences. Mechatronics 14:907–945
Johnson RA (1983) Mechanical filters in electronics. Wiley, New York, NY
Keskar G, Elliott B, Gaillard J, Skove MJ, Rao AM (2008) Using electric actuation and detection of oscillations in microcantilevers for pressure measurements. Sens Actuators A 147:203–209
Kirstein S, Mertesdorf M, Schönfoff M (1998) The influence of a viscous fluid on the vibration dynamics of scanning near-field optical microscopy fiber probes and atomic force microscopy cantilevers. J Appl Phys 84(4):1782–1790
Langlois WE (1962) Isothermal squeeze films. Quart Appl Math XX(2):131–150
Levinzon FA (2004) Fundamental noise limit of piezoelectric accelerometers. IEEE Sens J 4(1):108–111
Li L, Brown G, Uttamchandani D (2006) Air-damped microresonators with enhanced quality factor. J Microelectromech Syst 15(4):822–831
Lin L, Howe RT, Pisano AP (1998) Microelectromechanical filters for signal processing. J Microelectromech Syst 7(3):286–294
Ma PS, Kim JE, Kim YY (2010) Power-amplifying strategy in vibration-powered energy harvesters. Proc SPIE 7643:76430O-1
Martin MJ, Houston BH (2007) Gas damping of carbon nanotube oscillators. Appl Phys Lett 91(10):103116
Martin Y, Williams CC, Wickramasinghe HK (1987) Atomic force microscope-force mapping and profiling on a sub 100-Å scale. J Appl Phy 61:4723–4729
McCarthy B, Adams G, McGruer NE (2002) A dynamic model, including contact bounce, of an electrostatically actuated microswitch. J Microelectromech Syst 11(3): 276–283
Mitcheson PD, Yeatman EM, Rao GK, Holmes AS, Green TC (2008) Energy harvesting from human and machine motion for wireless electronic devices. Proceeding of the IEEE 96(9):1457–1486
Nielson GN, Barbastathis G (2006) Dynamic pull-in of parallel-plate and torsional electrostatic mems actuators. J Microelectromech Syst 15(4):811–821
Perez MA, Shkel AM (2008) The effect of squeeze film constriction on bandwidth improvement in interferometric accelerometers. J Micromech Microeng 18:055031
Pratap R, Mohite S, Pandey AK (2007) Squeeze films effects in MEMS devices. J Indian Inst Sci 87:75–94
Raman A, Melcher J, Tung R (2008) Cantilever dynamics in atomic force microscopy. Nanotoday 3(1–2):20–27
Renno JM, Daqaq MF, Inman DJ (2009) On the optimal energy harvesting from a vibration source. J Sound Vib 320:386–405
Roundy S (2005) On the effectiveness of vibration-based energy harvesting. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16:809–823
Rützel S, Lee SI, Raman A (2003) Nonlinear dynamics of atomic-force-microscope probes driven in Lennard-Jones potentials. Proc R Soc London A 459:1925–1948
Sader JE (1998) Frequency response of cantilever beams immersed in viscous fluids with applications to the atomic force microscope. J Appl Phys 84(1):64–76
Schitter G, Åström KJ, DeMartini BE, Thurner PJ, Turner KL, Hansma PK (2007) Design and modeling of a high-speed AFM-scanner. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 15(5):906–915
Soliman MSM, Abdel-Rahman EM, El-Saadany EF, Mansour RR (2008) A wideband vibration-based energy harvester. J Micromech Microeng 18:115021
Spreemann D, Hoffmann D, Folkmer B, Manoli Y (2008) Numerical optimization approach for resonant electromagnetic vibration transducer designed for random vibration. J Micromech Microeng 18:104001
Stark RW, Schitter G, Stemmer A (2003) Tuning the interaction forces in tapping mode atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B 68:085401-1
Stephen NG (2006) On energy harvesting from ambient vibration. J Sound Vib 293:409–425
Stokes SS (1901) Mathematical and physical papers, Vol. III. Cambridge University Press, London
Tilmans HAC (1996) Equivalent circuit representation of electromechanical transducers: I. Lumped parameter systems. J Micromech Microeng 6(1):157–176
Tuma JJ (1979) Engineering mathematics handbook, 2nd edn. McGraw Hill, New York
Veijola T (2004) Compact models for squeezed-film dampers with inertial and rarefied gas effects. J Micromech Microeng 14:1109–1118
Veijola T, Kuisma H, Lahdenpera J, Ryhanen T (1995) Equivalent-circuit model of the squeezed gas film in a silicon accelerometer. Sens Actuators A 48:239–248
Wang K, Nguyen CT-C (1997) High-order microelectromechanical electronic filters. Proceedings, 10th Annual International Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, IEEE Robotics and Automation Society, pp 25–30
Younis MI, Miles R, Jordy D (2006) Investigation of the response of microstructures under the combined effect of mechanical shock and electrostatic forces. J Micromech Microeng 16:2463–2474
Zhang WM, Meng G, Zhou J-B, Chen J-Y (2009) Nonlinear dynamics and chaos of microcantilever-based TM-AFMs with squeeze film effects. Sensors 9:3854–3874
Zhang Y, Zhao Y (2006) Numerical and analytical study on the pull-in instability of micro-structure under electrostatic loading. Sens Actuators A 127:366–380
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 2.1 Forces on a Submerged Vibrating Cylinder
Appendix 2.1 Forces on a Submerged Vibrating Cylinder
Consider a very long rigid solid circular cylinder of diameter b and length L that is immersed in an incompressible viscous fluid of density ρ f and dynamic viscosity μ f . It is assumed that the fluid can be modeled by the linearized momentum equations, which in terms of the scalar stream function \(\psi = \psi \left(r,\theta ,t\right)\) is given by (Stokes 1901, pp. 38–47)
where
A solution to Eq. (2.247) is \(\psi = \psi _1 + \psi _2\), where ψ 1 and ψ 2, respectively, are solutions to
The velocities of the fluid are given by
We assume that the origin of the polar coordinate system is at the center of the cylinder, and that the cylinder is undergoing forced harmonic oscillations at frequency ω of the form
where u o is the magnitude of the velocity. It is further assumed that the surrounding fluid is infinite in extent, that is, as \(r \to \infty\), \(u_r \to 0\) and \(u_\theta \to 0\).
In view of the boundary conditions given by Eq. (2.251), we assume solutions to Eq. (2.249) of the form
Substituting Eq. (2.252) into Eq. (2.249) yields
and
where
The solution to Eq. (2.253) is
To satisfy the requirements that as \(r \to \infty\), \(u_r \to 0\) and \(u_\theta \to 0\), we must set C 2 = 0. Then, Eq. (2.256) becomes
To determine the solution to Eq. (2.254), we rewrite it as
where
and Re is the Reynolds number . The solution to Eq. (2.258) is
where I 1(x) is the modified Bessel function of the first kind of order 1 and K 1(x) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order 1. To satisfy the requirements that as \(r \to \infty\), \(u_r \to 0\) and \(u_\theta \to 0\), we must set C 3 = 0. Then, Eq. (2.260) becomes
Thus, from Eqs. (2.257) and (2.261),
Then, from Eq. (2.250) and (2.262),
The constants C 1 and C 4 are determined by substituting Eq. (2.263) into the boundary conditions given by Eq. (2.251). This substitution results in
Solving Eq. (2.264) for C 1 and C 4, we obtain
Then Eqs. (2.261) and (2.257), respectively, become
and
The force F acting on the cylinder of length L at \(r = b/2\) is determined from
where
and p is the pressure in the fluid. We now use our previous results to evaluate each of the terms appearing in Eq. (2.269). From the velocity relations given by Eq. (2.250) and the boundary conditions given by Eq. (2.251), it is seen that
Furthermore, from Eqs. (2.248) to (2.250) and Eq. (2.270),
Using Eqs. (2.270) and (2.271) in Eq. (2.269), we obtain
Then, Eq. (2.268) becomes
We now use integration by parts on the first integral of Eq. (2.273) to obtain
It can be shown that (Stokes 1901, p. 39)
Therefore, Eq. (2.274) becomes
and Eq. (2.273) can be written as
Substituting Eqs. (2.252), (2.266), and (2.267) into Eq. (2.276), we arrive at
where
The quantity M f is the mass of the fluid displaced by the cylinder and Γ cir is a complex quantity called a hydrodynamic function . The force acting on the cylinder is obtained by taking the real part of F, which is
If the harmonic displacement of the cylinder in the x-direction is given by \(x = X_o \sin \left(\omega t\right)\), then Eq. (2.279) can be written as
where the over dot indicate the derivate with respect to time and we have recognized that for harmonic oscillations \(u_o = \omega X_o\). On the other hand, if the harmonic displacement of the cylinder in the x-direction is given by \(x = X_o e^{j\omega t}\), then Eq. (2.277) can be written as
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magrab, E.B. (2012). Spring-Mass Systems. In: Vibrations of Elastic Systems. Solid Mechanics and Its Applications, vol 184. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2672-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2672-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2671-0
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2672-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)