Skip to main content

Introduction: Pedagogy and Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pedagogies for Development

Part of the book series: Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects ((EDAP,volume 16))

  • 967 Accesses

Abstract

This book analyses how, since the 1990s, child-centred ideas have been used in international development discourses on education, promising more democratic and egalitarian schooling. This first chapter discusses the tensions created for primary school teachers in rural Indian contexts by the new authority relations sought in child-centred reforms. In doing so, the chapter raises questions about the social and material conditions required to sustain pedagogic change in development contexts. These questions frame the book’s analysis of two child-centred programs, Nali Kali and LC, implemented in rural government primary schools in Karnataka, India. As the overarching question of this book, this chapter poses: What is the relationship between child-centred education and development for the poor?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to 2008 survey data, 71.8% of children aged between 6 and 14 years are enrolled in government schools across India (ASER 2008).

  2. 2.

    The pseudonym LC has been used in order to protect the identities of teachers and project officers working with the smaller-scale programme.

References

  • Alexander, R. (2008). Education for all, the quality imperative and the problem of pedagogy. London: CREATE.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASER. (2008). Annual status of education report: National findings 2008. New Delhi: Assessment Survey Evaluation Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, A. M. (2007). Beyond the polarization of pedagogy: Models of classroom practice in Tanzanian primary schools. Comparative Education, 43(2), 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batra, P. (2005, October 1–7). Voice and agency of teachers: The missing link in national curriculum framework 2005. Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 4347–4356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capper, J., Nderitu, S., & Ogula, P. (2002). Conflict between national curriculum standards and efforts to improve teaching. In S. E. Anderson (Ed.), Improving schools through teacher development: Case studies of the Aga Khan Foundation projects in East Africa (pp. 83–116). The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carney, S. (2008). Learner-centred pedagogy in Tibet: International education reform in a local context. Comparative Education, 44(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandola, L. (2002). Teacher traits – A study. In R. P. Singh & G. Rana (Eds.), Teacher education in turmoil. Quest for a solution. New Delhi: Sterling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawla-Duggan, R. (2007). Children’s learner identity as key to quality primary education. Eight case studies of schooling in India today. Lewiston: Edwin-Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. (2001). Teaching and learning: The culture of pedagogy. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, P. (2003). Culture and classroom reform: The case of the district primary education project, India. Comparative Education, 39(1), 27–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, J. (2008). Do monitoring and evaluation tools designed to measure the improvement in the quality of primary education constrain or enhance educational development? International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 546–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutt, B. S. V., & Rao, D. B. (2001). Empowering primary teachers. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, C., Choksi, A., Awasty, V., Iyer, U., Moyade, R., Nigam, N., et al. (2002). Democratising teacher education research in India. Comparative Education, 38(3), 337–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2006). Selected educational statistics 2005–06. New Delhi: MHRD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (1983). Beyond progressive education. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, K. (2005). Political agenda of education: A study of colonialist and nationalist ideas. New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathur, P., & Khurana, A. (1996). Teachers’ perception of school climate and self-actualisation. Journal of Indian Education, 12(1), 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyambe, J., & Wilmot, D. (2008). Bernstein’s theory of pedagogic discourse: A framework for understanding how teacher educators in a Namibian college of education interpret and practice learner-centred pedagogy. Cardiff: Cardiff University School of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popkewitz, T. S. (2008). Cosmopolitanism and the age of school reform: Science, education, and making society by making the child. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudramamba, B. (2003). Problems of teaching. New Delhi: APH Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarangapani, P. (2003). Constructing school knowledge: An ethnography of learning in an Indian village. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, R., & Green, A. (1975). Education and social control: A study in progressive primary education. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., & Kumar, A. (1997). Primary teachers’ perceptions about their professional status. Journal of Indian Education, 13(3), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, I., Odada, M., & Omagor, M. (2002). Supporting child-centered teaching under universal primary education in Kampala, Uganda. In S. E. Anderson (Ed.), Improving schools through teacher development: Case studies of the Aga Khan Foundation projects in East Africa. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabulawa, R. (2003). International aid agencies, learner-centred pedagogy and political democratisation: A critique. Comparative Education, 39(1), 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapan, M. (1991). Life at school: An ethnographic study. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vavrus, F. (2009). The cultural politics of constructivist pedagogies: Teacher education reform in the United Republic of Tanzania. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 303–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1992). Progressive pedagogy and political struggle. In C. Luke & J. Gore (Eds.), Feminisms and critical pedagogy. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sriprakash, A. (2012). Introduction: Pedagogy and Development. In: Pedagogies for Development. Education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Issues, Concerns and Prospects, vol 16. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2669-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics