Abstract
Were one to compare a contemporary barbershop performance to a score of the same song, one might be surprised at the differences. Rather than rendering a score exactly as a composer or arranger indicates, most barbershoppers create their own “interpretations,” or understandings of what the song means, and use these to alter the rhythms, tempi, and notes of the written page. Instead of a gold standard, the barbershop score provides a starting place or guide for quartets and choruses, which have the final artistic authority over their performance. This tradition of song interpretation in modern barbershop singing emerged alongside much of the barbershop musical repertory in dialogue with the sheet music, vaudeville, and recording industries of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, a conversation that can still be heard today; as other studies have demonstrated, contemporary barbershop organizations and praxis continue to reflect the gender, race, and class discourses of the Victorian era (Averill, Four parts, no waiting: A social history of American Barbershop harmony. New York: Oxford University Press, 2003; Mook, Journal of the Society for American Music, 1, 453–483, 2007; Garnett, The British Barbershopper: A study in socio-musical values. Aldershot: Ashgate Press, 2005). However, when confronting practical matters of song interpretation, barbershoppers must also negotiate contemporary discourses of race, gender, class, age, and genre. They debate, for example, how to imagine the bourgeois, female object of a song’s lyrics, how young or old should they imagine themselves to be when performing, and whether certain styles of black music can fit within their genre. While referencing the history of barbershop singing, these internal debates also link the genre with its current social and cultural contexts, and empower barbershop performers to create meaning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ajer, L., & Hopkins, R. (1992). What’s the presentation category all about? Harmonizer, 52(5), 36.
Averill, G. (2003). Four parts, no waiting: A social history of American Barbershop harmony. New York: Oxford University Press.
Garnett, L. (2005). The British Barbershopper: A study in socio-musical values. Aldershot: Ashgate Press.
Geertz, C. (1972). Deep play: Notes on the Balinese cockfight. Daedalus, 101(1), 1–37.
Jackson, E. (1982). In-ter’pre-ta’tion. The Harmonizer, 42(3), 10.
Leeder, D. (2001). Lay the groundwork for interpretation. The Harmonizer, 56(4), 10.
Mook, R. (2007). White masculinity in Barbershop quartet singing: 1900–2003. Journal of the Society for American Music, 1, 453–483.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mook, R. (2012). The Sounds of Gender: Textualizing Barbershop Performance. In: Harrison, S., Welch, G., Adler, A. (eds) Perspectives on Males and Singing. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2660-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2660-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2659-8
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2660-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)