Abstract
Students continue to reject mathematics when they have a choice, particularly in the senior school years and at tertiary levels (Australian Academy of Science, Mathematics and statistics: critical skills for Australia’s future. The national strategic review of mathematical sciences research in Australia, Australian Academy of Science, Canberra, 2006; Grootenboer P, Zevenbergen R, Identity and mathematics: towards a theory of agency in coming to learn mathematics. In: Watson J, Beswick K (eds) Mathematics: essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Tasmania, vol. 1. MERGA, Adelaide, pp 335–344, 2007). Furthermore, students continue to see mathematics as irrelevant, dull and of little practical value and so many complete their formal mathematics education with poor mathematical identities and feeling mathematically disenfranchised. Despite the hope that modern technologies would result in improved and more effective mathematics pedagogy and improve student interest in this field, student disengagement is a continuing problem. Taking a more open approach to the definition of technology than is often the case in mathematics classrooms, this chapter explores the potential mathematical investigations that make use of what might be thought of as old-fashioned technologies. We demonstrate the role these forgotten technologies play within an investigative approach designed to support the development of particular mathematical concepts for a group of at risk and disenfranchised learners and show how we can develop new relationships between kids and mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Australian Academy of Science. (2006). Mathematics and statistics: Critical skills for Australia’s future. The national strategic review of mathematical sciences research in Australia. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.
Boaler, J. (2008). Promoting ‘relational equity’ and high mathematics achievement through an innovative mixed ability approach. British Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 167–194.
Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.
Borasi, R., & Rose, B. J. (1989). Journal writing and mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(4), 347–365.
Brown, M., Brown, P., & Biddy, T. (2008). “I would rather die”: Reasons given by 16-year-olds for not continuing their study of mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(1), 3–18.
Burton, L. (1998). The practices of mathematicians: What do they tell us about coming to know mathematics? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(2), 121–143.
Cobb, P., Wood, T., & Yackel, E. (1993). Discourse, mathematical thinking and classroom practice. In E. A. Foreman, N. Minick, & C. A. Stone (Eds.), Contexts for learning: Sociocultural dynamics in children’s development (pp. 91–119). New York: Oxford University Press.
Connell, R.W. (1993). Schools and Social Justice. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Department of Education and the Arts. (2004). The new basics research report, assessment & New Basics Branch. Brisbane: New Basics Branch.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhances critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 22–30.
Grootenboer, P. (2010). Beliefs, attitudes and feelings students learn about mathematics. Far East Journal of Mathematical Education, 5(1), 31–52.
Grootenboer, P., & Zevenbergen, R. (2007). Identity and mathematics: Towards a theory of agency in coming to learn mathematics. In J. Watson & K. Beswick (Eds.), Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, Tasmania (Vol. 1, pp. 335–344). Adelaide: MERGA.
Hilton, R. (2006). Gaming as an education tool. Young Consumers: Insight and Ideas for Responsible Marketers, 7(2), 1–14.
Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.
Lingard, B., Martino, W., Mills, M., & Bahr, N. (2002). Addressing the educational needs of boys. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training. Retrieved from http://www.dest.gov.au/archive/schools/publications/2002/boyseducation/Boys_Report_Final1.pdf
Newman, F. M., Marks, H. M., & Gamoran, A. (1995). Authentic pedagogy: Standards that boost students’ performance. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 8(Spring), 1–16.
Palmer, P. (1993). To know as we are known: Education as a spiritual journey. New York: HarperCollins.
Putman, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4–15.
Queensland Studies Authority. (2007). Essential learnings and standards: Position paper. Retrieved from http://www.qsa.qld.edu.au/downloads/assessment/qcar_el_position_paper.pdf
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Smith, J. P. 3rd. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(4), 387–402.
Solomon, Y. (2007). Experiencing mathematics classes: Ability grouping, gender and the selective development of participative identities. International Journal of Educational Research, 46, 8–19.
Van de Walle, J. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally. Boston: Pearson.
Zevenbergen, R., & Grootenboer, P. (2009). Towards a theory of identity and agency in coming to learn mathematics. The Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 255–266.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science +Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marshman, M., Grootenboer, P. (2012). Scissors, Papers Rock: Old-World Technologies for Future-Proofing Pedagogy. Re-engaging Students in Mathematics Classrooms. In: Rowan, L., Bigum, C. (eds) Transformative Approaches to New Technologies and Student Diversity in Futures Oriented Classrooms. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2642-0_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2642-0_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2641-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2642-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)