Skip to main content

Abstract

This chapter is concerned with the way schools and school systems in the over-developed world have come to terms with computers and related technologies and, particularly, recurring patterns in terms of how schools’ relationships with computers are considered and evaluated. The patterns I will describe are quite remarkable in that they have repeated over the past 30 years, and, as I will argue, will likely continue into the future. They are essentially patterns of response: response to whatever the producers of digital products for educational purposes place in front of schools; response to anxiety about keeping up with the schools-next-door and, ironically, response to concerns that, left unchecked, technologies could disrupt the patterns of schooling and, by extension, student learning. Even though the nature of the pro-offered products (and the associated technologies) has changed greatly since the early 1980s, the ways in which schools and school systems have responded to “the new” and “the latest” remains largely unchanged. I explore the way these patterns constrain debates about underlying technologies (which I prefer to call computing and communication technologies) and the value of taking a fresh look at the school/computer relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I prefer the term “computing,” which is what these machines actually do, over “information.” Information connotes more than data. As Bateson (1999) suggests, information is the difference that makes a difference. But given the ubiquity of the acronym IT and ICT I will use these terms here.

  2. 2.

    An exabyte is a billion gigabytes. A gigabyte is 1,000 megabytes. A small book is roughly 1.5 megabytes. This makes a gigabyte about 600–700 books and an exabyte 600–700 billion books.

  3. 3.

    A study by IDC (Gantz et al. 2007) provides a detailed analysis of growth patterns and the methodology for doing the calculation.

  4. 4.

    A useful history can be found at: http://www.davesite.com/webstation/net-history.shtml. The tight association between the interests of the US military and the educational use of ICTs continues to this day (Noble 1991).

  5. 5.

    The term “microcomputer” reflected not only the physical size of the computer but also, relative to what were then called mainframe computers, their computing power. As computer power has increased significantly these terms have become obsolete and we are left with two broad classes: computers and super computers.

  6. 6.

    The quote is attributed to Gibson but the specifics are uncertain, see, e.g. http://www.brianstorms.com/archives/000461.html for a history of the web publication of the quote.

  7. 7.

    The calculator proved to be something of a harbinger of the debates about computer use in the classroom. The calculator was then at the centre of a debate in the teaching of mathematics in schools. The use of calculators in schools, and in the teaching of mathematics, has an interesting history (see for example, Ellington 2003; Fey 1989) that points to an important idea—the delegation of work to a machine—to which I will return in a later chapter.

  8. 8.

    I recall with the early Apples that, on occasion, they would malfunction when they were in use for a time. The heat from the circuitry would sometimes cause the chips to rise from their seats on the motherboard. Switching off and gently pressing the computer chips down into the mother board would often solve the problem. In warmer parts of the country, teachers would explain how they kept modems in the refrigerator before use.

  9. 9.

    Ursula Franklin (1990) has a detailed account of this process for a number of contemporary technologies.

  10. 10.

    Framing was a notion developed by Erving Goffman (1974). It has been popularised more recently by the work of George Lakoff (1987, 1993, 2002, 2004).

  11. 11.

    Carolyn Marvin (1988) has an excellent account of early technologies in the US.

  12. 12.

    This is no simple matter. More unpaid product development engineering is required for each new ICT.

  13. 13.

    As Perelman (1992) noted, putting computers into classrooms is akin to putting an internal combustion engine in a horse.

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (2004). Transforming the systems movement. The Systems Thinker, 15(8). Retrieved from http://www.acasa.upenn.edu/RLAConfPaper.pdf

  • Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2008). Access to the internet, broadband and mobile phones in family households (Media and communications in Australian families series, Vol. 3). Canberra: Australian Communications and Media Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1999). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. J. (1984). Computers in schools today: Some basic considerations. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigum, C. (2002). Design sensibilities, schools and the new computing and communication technologies. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic era (pp. 130–140). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigum, C. (2011). Enactments, networks and quasi-objects: A stranger in a strange land. In R. Tinning & K. Sirna (Eds.), Education, social justice and the legacy of Deakin University: Reflections of the Deakin diaspora (pp. 39–57). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigum, C., & Rowan, L. (2008). Landscaping on shifting ground: Teacher education in a digitally transforming world. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 245–255. doi:10.1080/13598660802232787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigum, C., Bonser, S., Evans, P., Groundwater-Smith, S., Grundy, S., Kemmis, S., & Willis, S. (1987). Coming to terms with computers in schools: Report to the commonwealth schools commission. Geelong: Deakin Institute for Studies in Education, Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bubenko, J., Impagliazzo, J., & Sølvberg, A. (2005). History of Nordic computing: IFIPWG9.7. Paper presented at First Working Conference on the History of Nordic Computing (HiNC1), June 16–18, 2003, Trondheim, Norway, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley, R., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. K. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools: Policy information report. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellington, A. J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey, J. T. (1989). Technology and mathematics education: A survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 237–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo cult science: Some remarks on science, pseudoscience, and learning how to not fool yourself. Retrieved from http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.pdf

  • Finger, G., & Lee, M. (2010). Developing networked school communities and creating the home-school nexus. Paper presented at the ACEC2010: Digital diversity. Conference proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference 2010, Carlton, Victoria. Retrieved from http://acec2010.info/proposal/228/developing-networked-school-communities-and-creating-home-school-nexus

  • Fitzgerald, D., Hattie, J., & Hughes, P. (1986). Computer applications in Australian classrooms. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, U. (1990). The real world of technology. Montreal: CBC Enterprises.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gantz, J. F., Reinsel, D., Chute, C., Schlichting, W., McArthur, J., Minton, S., & Manfrediz, A. (2007). The expanding digital universe: A forecast of worldwide information growth through 2010. Framingham: IDC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heng, S. (2006). Media industry facing biggest upheaval since gutenberg: Media consumers morphing into media makers. Deutsche Bank Research. Retrieved from SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=937870

  • Hill, S. (1988). The tragedy of technology. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impagliazzo, J., & International Federation for Information Processing. (2006, August 21–26). History of computing and education 2 (HCE2): IFIP. Paper presented at the 19th World Computer Congress, WG 9.7, TC 9. Proceedings of the Second Conference on the History of Computing and Education, Santiago, Chile, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Impagliazzo, J., & Lee, J. A. N. (2004, August 22–27). History of computing in education: IFIP. Paper presented at the 18th World Congress, 1st Conference on the History of Computing in Education. Toulouse, France, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Researching new literacies: Web 2.0 practices and insider perspectives. E-learning, 4(3), 224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lankshear, C., Bigum, C., Durrant, C., Green, B., Honan, E., Murray, J., Morgan, W., Snyder, I., & Wild, M. (1997). Digital rhetorics: Literacies and technologies in classrooms current practices and future directions. Canberra: DEETYA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about communications in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, A. S. (1997). Computers in education: A brief history. Journal of Technological Horizons In Education, 24(11), 63–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, R. A. (1994). History of the idea of progress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. D. (1991). The classroom arsenal: Military research: Information technology and public education. London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world?: What PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1972). Teaching children to be mathematicians versus teaching about mathematicians. International Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 3, 249–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, L. J. (1992). School’s out: Hyperlearning, the new technology, and the end of education. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, R. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64. doi:10.1007/bf02504506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifter, C. C. (2008). A brief history of computers, computing in education, and computing in Philadelphia schools. In C. Schifter (Ed.), Infusing technology into the classroom: Continuous practice improvement (pp. 1–30). Hershey: IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schrage, M. (2006). Process pantomime: When form substitutes for substance, you have an IT leadership problem. CIO. Framingham, 19(23), 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. (2009). Not an upgrade—An upheaval. Cato unbound. Retrieved from http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/07/13/clay-shirky/not-an-upgrade-an-upheaval/

  • Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. E. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 475–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatnall, A., & Davey, B. (2004). Streams in the history of computer education in Australia. In J. Impagliazzo & J. Lee (Eds.), History of computing in education (Vol. 145, pp. 83–90). Boston: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences (1st ed.). New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A Century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, J. (1997). Old freedoms and new technologies: The evolution of community networking. The Information Society, 13(2), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zakariya, S. B. (1984). In school (as elsewhere), the rich get computers, the poor get poorer. American School Board Journal, March, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammit, S. A. (1992). Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools. Educational Research, 34(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Bigum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science +Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bigum, C. (2012). Schools and Computers: Tales of a Digital Romance. In: Rowan, L., Bigum, C. (eds) Transformative Approaches to New Technologies and Student Diversity in Futures Oriented Classrooms. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2642-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics