Abstract
This chapter is concerned with the way schools and school systems in the over-developed world have come to terms with computers and related technologies and, particularly, recurring patterns in terms of how schools’ relationships with computers are considered and evaluated. The patterns I will describe are quite remarkable in that they have repeated over the past 30 years, and, as I will argue, will likely continue into the future. They are essentially patterns of response: response to whatever the producers of digital products for educational purposes place in front of schools; response to anxiety about keeping up with the schools-next-door and, ironically, response to concerns that, left unchecked, technologies could disrupt the patterns of schooling and, by extension, student learning. Even though the nature of the pro-offered products (and the associated technologies) has changed greatly since the early 1980s, the ways in which schools and school systems have responded to “the new” and “the latest” remains largely unchanged. I explore the way these patterns constrain debates about underlying technologies (which I prefer to call computing and communication technologies) and the value of taking a fresh look at the school/computer relationships.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I prefer the term “computing,” which is what these machines actually do, over “information.” Information connotes more than data. As Bateson (1999) suggests, information is the difference that makes a difference. But given the ubiquity of the acronym IT and ICT I will use these terms here.
- 2.
An exabyte is a billion gigabytes. A gigabyte is 1,000 megabytes. A small book is roughly 1.5 megabytes. This makes a gigabyte about 600–700 books and an exabyte 600–700 billion books.
- 3.
A study by IDC (Gantz et al. 2007) provides a detailed analysis of growth patterns and the methodology for doing the calculation.
- 4.
A useful history can be found at: http://www.davesite.com/webstation/net-history.shtml. The tight association between the interests of the US military and the educational use of ICTs continues to this day (Noble 1991).
- 5.
The term “microcomputer” reflected not only the physical size of the computer but also, relative to what were then called mainframe computers, their computing power. As computer power has increased significantly these terms have become obsolete and we are left with two broad classes: computers and super computers.
- 6.
The quote is attributed to Gibson but the specifics are uncertain, see, e.g. http://www.brianstorms.com/archives/000461.html for a history of the web publication of the quote.
- 7.
The calculator proved to be something of a harbinger of the debates about computer use in the classroom. The calculator was then at the centre of a debate in the teaching of mathematics in schools. The use of calculators in schools, and in the teaching of mathematics, has an interesting history (see for example, Ellington 2003; Fey 1989) that points to an important idea—the delegation of work to a machine—to which I will return in a later chapter.
- 8.
I recall with the early Apples that, on occasion, they would malfunction when they were in use for a time. The heat from the circuitry would sometimes cause the chips to rise from their seats on the motherboard. Switching off and gently pressing the computer chips down into the mother board would often solve the problem. In warmer parts of the country, teachers would explain how they kept modems in the refrigerator before use.
- 9.
Ursula Franklin (1990) has a detailed account of this process for a number of contemporary technologies.
- 10.
- 11.
Carolyn Marvin (1988) has an excellent account of early technologies in the US.
- 12.
This is no simple matter. More unpaid product development engineering is required for each new ICT.
- 13.
As Perelman (1992) noted, putting computers into classrooms is akin to putting an internal combustion engine in a horse.
References
Ackoff, R. L. (2004). Transforming the systems movement. The Systems Thinker, 15(8). Retrieved from http://www.acasa.upenn.edu/RLAConfPaper.pdf
Australian Communications and Media Authority. (2008). Access to the internet, broadband and mobile phones in family households (Media and communications in Australian families series, Vol. 3). Canberra: Australian Communications and Media Authority.
Bateson, G. (1999). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Becker, H. J. (1984). Computers in schools today: Some basic considerations. American Journal of Education, 93(1), 22–39.
Bigum, C. (2002). Design sensibilities, schools and the new computing and communication technologies. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Silicon literacies: Communication, innovation and education in the electronic era (pp. 130–140). London: Routledge.
Bigum, C. (2011). Enactments, networks and quasi-objects: A stranger in a strange land. In R. Tinning & K. Sirna (Eds.), Education, social justice and the legacy of Deakin University: Reflections of the Deakin diaspora (pp. 39–57). New York: Peter Lang.
Bigum, C., & Rowan, L. (2008). Landscaping on shifting ground: Teacher education in a digitally transforming world. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 245–255. doi:10.1080/13598660802232787.
Bigum, C., Bonser, S., Evans, P., Groundwater-Smith, S., Grundy, S., Kemmis, S., & Willis, S. (1987). Coming to terms with computers in schools: Report to the commonwealth schools commission. Geelong: Deakin Institute for Studies in Education, Deakin University.
Bubenko, J., Impagliazzo, J., & Sølvberg, A. (2005). History of Nordic computing: IFIPWG9.7. Paper presented at First Working Conference on the History of Nordic Computing (HiNC1), June 16–18, 2003, Trondheim, Norway, Springer, New York.
Coley, R., Cradler, J., & Engel, P. K. (1997). Computers and classrooms: The status of technology in U.S. schools: Policy information report. Princeton: Educational Testing Service, Policy Information Center.
Cuban, L. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Eisenstein, E. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellington, A. J. (2003). A meta-analysis of the effects of calculators on students’ achievement and attitude levels in precollege mathematics classes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(5), 433–463.
Fey, J. T. (1989). Technology and mathematics education: A survey of recent developments and important problems. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(3), 237–272.
Feynman, R. P. (1974). Cargo cult science: Some remarks on science, pseudoscience, and learning how to not fool yourself. Retrieved from http://calteches.library.caltech.edu/51/2/CargoCult.pdf
Finger, G., & Lee, M. (2010). Developing networked school communities and creating the home-school nexus. Paper presented at the ACEC2010: Digital diversity. Conference proceedings of the Australian Computers in Education Conference 2010, Carlton, Victoria. Retrieved from http://acec2010.info/proposal/228/developing-networked-school-communities-and-creating-home-school-nexus
Fitzgerald, D., Hattie, J., & Hughes, P. (1986). Computer applications in Australian classrooms. Canberra: Commonwealth Department of Education.
Franklin, U. (1990). The real world of technology. Montreal: CBC Enterprises.
Gantz, J. F., Reinsel, D., Chute, C., Schlichting, W., McArthur, J., Minton, S., & Manfrediz, A. (2007). The expanding digital universe: A forecast of worldwide information growth through 2010. Framingham: IDC.
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
Heng, S. (2006). Media industry facing biggest upheaval since gutenberg: Media consumers morphing into media makers. Deutsche Bank Research. Retrieved from SSRN http://ssrn.com/abstract=937870
Hill, S. (1988). The tragedy of technology. London: Pluto Press.
Impagliazzo, J., & International Federation for Information Processing. (2006, August 21–26). History of computing and education 2 (HCE2): IFIP. Paper presented at the 19th World Computer Congress, WG 9.7, TC 9. Proceedings of the Second Conference on the History of Computing and Education, Santiago, Chile, Springer, New York.
Impagliazzo, J., & Lee, J. A. N. (2004, August 22–27). History of computing in education: IFIP. Paper presented at the 18th World Congress, 1st Conference on the History of Computing in Education. Toulouse, France, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. (2002). Moral politics: How liberals and conservatives think (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an elephant!: Know your values and frame the debate: The essential guide for progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Pub. Co.
Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Researching new literacies: Web 2.0 practices and insider perspectives. E-learning, 4(3), 224.
Lankshear, C., Bigum, C., Durrant, C., Green, B., Honan, E., Murray, J., Morgan, W., Snyder, I., & Wild, M. (1997). Digital rhetorics: Literacies and technologies in classrooms current practices and future directions. Canberra: DEETYA.
Marvin, C. (1988). When old technologies were new: Thinking about communications in the late nineteenth century. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Molnar, A. S. (1997). Computers in education: A brief history. Journal of Technological Horizons In Education, 24(11), 63–68.
Nisbet, R. A. (1994). History of the idea of progress. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
Noble, D. D. (1991). The classroom arsenal: Military research: Information technology and public education. London: The Falmer Press.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2006). Are students ready for a technology-rich world?: What PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD.
Papert, S. (1972). Teaching children to be mathematicians versus teaching about mathematicians. International Journal of Mathematics Education, Science and Technology, 3, 249–262.
Perelman, L. J. (1992). School’s out: Hyperlearning, the new technology, and the end of education. New York: William Morrow.
Reiser, R. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53–64. doi:10.1007/bf02504506.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
Schifter, C. C. (2008). A brief history of computers, computing in education, and computing in Philadelphia schools. In C. Schifter (Ed.), Infusing technology into the classroom: Continuous practice improvement (pp. 1–30). Hershey: IGI Global.
Schrage, M. (2006). Process pantomime: When form substitutes for substance, you have an IT leadership problem. CIO. Framingham, 19(23), 46–49.
Shirky, C. (2009). Not an upgrade—An upheaval. Cato unbound. Retrieved from http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/07/13/clay-shirky/not-an-upgrade-an-upheaval/
Sproull, L., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Sutton, R. E. (1991). Equity and computers in the schools: A decade of research. Review of Educational Research, 61(4), 475–503.
Tatnall, A., & Davey, B. (2004). Streams in the history of computer education in Australia. In J. Impagliazzo & J. Lee (Eds.), History of computing in education (Vol. 145, pp. 83–90). Boston: Springer.
Tenner, E. (1996). Why things bite back: Technology and the revenge of unintended consequences (1st ed.). New York: Knopf.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A Century of public school reform. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Weston, J. (1997). Old freedoms and new technologies: The evolution of community networking. The Information Society, 13(2), 195–201.
Zakariya, S. B. (1984). In school (as elsewhere), the rich get computers, the poor get poorer. American School Board Journal, March, 29–32.
Zammit, S. A. (1992). Factors facilitating or hindering the use of computers in schools. Educational Research, 34(1), 57–66.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science +Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bigum, C. (2012). Schools and Computers: Tales of a Digital Romance. In: Rowan, L., Bigum, C. (eds) Transformative Approaches to New Technologies and Student Diversity in Futures Oriented Classrooms. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2642-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2642-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2641-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2642-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)