Abstract
South American tree plantations expand at a rate of 5,000 km2/year favored by increasingly globalized markets and local economic conditions. The main hydrological impacts of these plantations involve shifts in (a) the partition of precipitation inputs between vapour vs. liquid fluxes (associated to transpiration and canopy interception shifts) and (b) the partition of liquid fluxes between run-off and fast flow vs. deep drainage and base flow (associated to infiltration and surface water routing shifts). In sloped terrains global stream flow measurements in paired watersheds indicate declining water yields (40% less on average) under plantations vs. native vegetation. These effects are stronger under drier climates, where host vegetation is herbaceous, and where planted trees are eucalypts. In flat landscapes with native grassland vegetation, tree plantations switch the water balance from positive (net recharge) to negative (net discharge) triggering local salinization. Contrastingly, where native vegetation has been a woodland tree plantation can remediate the undesirable recharge and water table rise/salinization problems brought by agriculture. In degraded rolling (sub)tropical landscapes with intense rainfall inputs and high run-off, tree plantations can increase infiltration rates, reducing erosion, stabilizing flow, but cutting total water yield. As a result of these shifts, erosion can be reduced and the stability and quality of water provision improved, yet these benefits can be erased by large scale clear cutting practices. Context (climate, current vegetation and topography/geology) and design (species, densities, harvesting methods, and scale/pattern) can decide the magnitude and sign of tree plantations effects and need to be carefully considered to get the best ecological outcome of afforestation in the continent.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Buytaert W, Iñiguezet V, De Bievre B (2007) The effect of afforestation and cultivation on water yield in the Andean paramo. For Ecol Manag 251:22–30
Cubbage F et al. (2007) Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South American and Southern United States. New Forests 33:237–255
Donoso PJ (2009) Tala Rasa: Implicancias y desafíos. Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) (2001) Global forest resources assessment 2000. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
Farley KA, Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2005) Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy. Glob Change Biol 11:1565–1576
Farley KA, Piñeiro G, Palmer SM, Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2008) Stream acidification and base cation losses with grassland afforestation. Water Resour Res 44:W00A03. doi:10.1029/2007WR006659
George RJ, McFarlane DJ, Nulsen RA (1997) Salinity threatens the viability of agriculture and ecosystems in Western Australia. Hydrogeol J 5:6–21
George RJ, Nulsen RA, Ferdowsian R, Raper GP (1999) Interactions between trees and groundwaters in recharge and discharge areas – a survey of Western Australian sites. Agric Water Manag 39:91–113
Ilstedt U, Malmerm A, Verbeeten E, Murdiyarso D (2007) The effect of afforestation on water infiltration in the tropics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. For Ecol Manag 251:45–51
Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB (2004) Groundwater use and salinization with grassland afforestation. Glob Change Biol 10:1299–1312
Jobbágy EG, Nosetto MD, Santoni CS, Baldi G (2008) El desafío ecohidrológico de las transiciones entre sistemas leñosos y herbáceos en la llanura Chaco-Pampeana. Ecología Austral 18:305–322
Jones JA, Grant GE (1996) Peak flow responses to clear-cutting and roads in small and large basins, western Cascades, Oregon. Water Resour Res 32:959–974
Lara A, Little C, Urrutia R, McPhee J, Alvarez-Garreton C, Oyaarzun C, Soto D, Donoso P, Nahuelhual L, Pino M, Arismendi I (2009) Assessment of ecosystem services as an opportunity for the conservation and management of native forests in Chile. For Ecol Manag 258:415–424
Mishra A, Sharma SD, Pandey R, Mishra L (2004) Amelioration of a highly alkaline soil by trees in northern India. Soil Use Manag 20:325–332
Nosetto MD, Jobbágy EG, Toth T, Di Bella CM (2007) The effects of tree establishment on water and salts dynamics in naturally salt-affected grasslands. Oecologia 152:695–705
Nosetto MD, Jobbágy EG, Toth T, Jackson RB (2008) Regional patterns and controls of ecosystem salinization with grassland afforestation across a rainfall gradient. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 22:GB2015. doi:10.1029/2007GB003000
Pizarro R, Araya S, Jordán C, Farías C, Flores JP, Bro P (2006) The effects of changes in vegetative cover on river flows in the Purapel river basin of central Chile. J Hydrol 327:249–257
Santoni CS, Jobbágy EG, Contreras S (2010) Vadose transport of water and chloride in dry forests of central Argentina: the role of land use and soil texture. Water Resour Res, 46: W10541
Silveira L, Alonso J (2008) Runoff modifications due to the conversion of natural grasslands to forests in a large basin in Uruguay. Hydrol Process 23:320–329
von Stackelberg NO, Chescheir GM, Skaggs RW, Amatya DM (2007) Simulation of the hydrologic effects of afforestation in the tacuarembo river basin, Uruguay. Trans ASABE 50:455–468
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jobbágy, E.G., Baldi, G., Nosetto, M.D. (2011). Tree Plantation in South America and The Water Cycle: Impacts and Emergent Opportunities. In: Schlichter, T., Montes, L. (eds) Forests in Development: A Vital Balance. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2576-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2576-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2575-1
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2576-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)